Cargando…

Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine

Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianco, Gabriele, Boattini, Matteo, Comini, Sara, Banche, Giuliana, Cavallo, Rossana, Costa, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030604
_version_ 1784913571714433024
author Bianco, Gabriele
Boattini, Matteo
Comini, Sara
Banche, Giuliana
Cavallo, Rossana
Costa, Cristina
author_facet Bianco, Gabriele
Boattini, Matteo
Comini, Sara
Banche, Giuliana
Cavallo, Rossana
Costa, Cristina
author_sort Bianco, Gabriele
collection PubMed
description Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller–Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP(®) cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (≤2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10045311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100453112023-03-29 Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine Bianco, Gabriele Boattini, Matteo Comini, Sara Banche, Giuliana Cavallo, Rossana Costa, Cristina Antibiotics (Basel) Article Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller–Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP(®) cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (≤2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories. MDPI 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10045311/ /pubmed/36978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030604 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bianco, Gabriele
Boattini, Matteo
Comini, Sara
Banche, Giuliana
Cavallo, Rossana
Costa, Cristina
Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
title Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
title_full Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
title_fullStr Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
title_full_unstemmed Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
title_short Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
title_sort disc diffusion and comasp(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in clinical laboratory routine
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030604
work_keys_str_mv AT biancogabriele discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine
AT boattinimatteo discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine
AT cominisara discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine
AT banchegiuliana discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine
AT cavallorossana discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine
AT costacristina discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine