Cargando…
Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine
Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030604 |
_version_ | 1784913571714433024 |
---|---|
author | Bianco, Gabriele Boattini, Matteo Comini, Sara Banche, Giuliana Cavallo, Rossana Costa, Cristina |
author_facet | Bianco, Gabriele Boattini, Matteo Comini, Sara Banche, Giuliana Cavallo, Rossana Costa, Cristina |
author_sort | Bianco, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller–Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP(®) cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (≤2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10045311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100453112023-03-29 Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine Bianco, Gabriele Boattini, Matteo Comini, Sara Banche, Giuliana Cavallo, Rossana Costa, Cristina Antibiotics (Basel) Article Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller–Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP(®) cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (≤2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP(®) panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories. MDPI 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10045311/ /pubmed/36978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030604 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bianco, Gabriele Boattini, Matteo Comini, Sara Banche, Giuliana Cavallo, Rossana Costa, Cristina Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine |
title | Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine |
title_full | Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine |
title_fullStr | Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine |
title_full_unstemmed | Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine |
title_short | Disc Diffusion and ComASP(®) Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine |
title_sort | disc diffusion and comasp(®) cefiderocol microdilution panel to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in clinical laboratory routine |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biancogabriele discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine AT boattinimatteo discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine AT cominisara discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine AT banchegiuliana discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine AT cavallorossana discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine AT costacristina discdiffusionandcomaspcefiderocolmicrodilutionpaneltoovercomethechallengeofcefiderocolsusceptibilitytestinginclinicallaboratoryroutine |