Cargando…

Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?

Agricultural soil degradation is occurring at unprecedented rates, not only as an indirect effect of climate change (CC) but also due to intensified agricultural practices which affect soil properties and biodiversity. Therefore, understanding the impacts of CC and soil degradation on plant physiolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spormann, Sofia, Nadais, Pedro, Sousa, Filipa, Pinto, Mafalda, Martins, Maria, Sousa, Bruno, Fidalgo, Fernanda, Soares, Cristiano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030666
_version_ 1784913595188903936
author Spormann, Sofia
Nadais, Pedro
Sousa, Filipa
Pinto, Mafalda
Martins, Maria
Sousa, Bruno
Fidalgo, Fernanda
Soares, Cristiano
author_facet Spormann, Sofia
Nadais, Pedro
Sousa, Filipa
Pinto, Mafalda
Martins, Maria
Sousa, Bruno
Fidalgo, Fernanda
Soares, Cristiano
author_sort Spormann, Sofia
collection PubMed
description Agricultural soil degradation is occurring at unprecedented rates, not only as an indirect effect of climate change (CC) but also due to intensified agricultural practices which affect soil properties and biodiversity. Therefore, understanding the impacts of CC and soil degradation on plant physiology is crucial for the sustainable development of mitigation strategies to prevent crop productivity losses. The amino acid proline has long been recognized for playing distinct roles in plant cells undergoing osmotic stress. Due to its osmoprotectant and redox-buffering ability, a positive correlation between proline accumulation and plants’ tolerance to abiotic stress has been pointed out in numerous reviews. Indeed, proline quantification is used systematically by plant physiologists as an indicator of the degree of tolerance and a measurement of the antioxidant potential in plants under stressful conditions. Moreover, the exogenous application of proline has been shown to increase resilience to several stress factors, including those related to soil degradation such as salinity and exposure to metals and xenobiotics. However, recent data from several studies often refer to proline accumulation as a signal of stress sensitivity with no clear correlation with improved antioxidant activity or higher stress tolerance, including when proline is used exogenously as a stress reliever. Nevertheless, endogenous proline levels are strongly modified by these stresses, proving its involvement in plant responses. Hence, one main question arises—is proline augmentation always a sign of improved stress resilience? From this perspective, the present review aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of proline accumulation in plants under abiotic stress induced by soil degradation factors, reinforcing the idea that proline quantification should not be employed as a sole indicator of stress sensitivity or resilience but rather complemented with further biochemical and physiological endpoints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10045403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100454032023-03-29 Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page? Spormann, Sofia Nadais, Pedro Sousa, Filipa Pinto, Mafalda Martins, Maria Sousa, Bruno Fidalgo, Fernanda Soares, Cristiano Antioxidants (Basel) Review Agricultural soil degradation is occurring at unprecedented rates, not only as an indirect effect of climate change (CC) but also due to intensified agricultural practices which affect soil properties and biodiversity. Therefore, understanding the impacts of CC and soil degradation on plant physiology is crucial for the sustainable development of mitigation strategies to prevent crop productivity losses. The amino acid proline has long been recognized for playing distinct roles in plant cells undergoing osmotic stress. Due to its osmoprotectant and redox-buffering ability, a positive correlation between proline accumulation and plants’ tolerance to abiotic stress has been pointed out in numerous reviews. Indeed, proline quantification is used systematically by plant physiologists as an indicator of the degree of tolerance and a measurement of the antioxidant potential in plants under stressful conditions. Moreover, the exogenous application of proline has been shown to increase resilience to several stress factors, including those related to soil degradation such as salinity and exposure to metals and xenobiotics. However, recent data from several studies often refer to proline accumulation as a signal of stress sensitivity with no clear correlation with improved antioxidant activity or higher stress tolerance, including when proline is used exogenously as a stress reliever. Nevertheless, endogenous proline levels are strongly modified by these stresses, proving its involvement in plant responses. Hence, one main question arises—is proline augmentation always a sign of improved stress resilience? From this perspective, the present review aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of proline accumulation in plants under abiotic stress induced by soil degradation factors, reinforcing the idea that proline quantification should not be employed as a sole indicator of stress sensitivity or resilience but rather complemented with further biochemical and physiological endpoints. MDPI 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10045403/ /pubmed/36978914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030666 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Spormann, Sofia
Nadais, Pedro
Sousa, Filipa
Pinto, Mafalda
Martins, Maria
Sousa, Bruno
Fidalgo, Fernanda
Soares, Cristiano
Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?
title Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?
title_full Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?
title_fullStr Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?
title_full_unstemmed Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?
title_short Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page?
title_sort accumulation of proline in plants under contaminated soils—are we on the same page?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030666
work_keys_str_mv AT spormannsofia accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT nadaispedro accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT sousafilipa accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT pintomafalda accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT martinsmaria accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT sousabruno accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT fidalgofernanda accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage
AT soarescristiano accumulationofprolineinplantsundercontaminatedsoilsareweonthesamepage