Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010129 |
_version_ | 1785013646631370752 |
---|---|
author | Pcheliakov, Alexey A. Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu. Vasil’ev, Yuriy L. Svitich, Oxana A. Poddubikov, Alexander V. Evlashin, Stanislav A. Volel, Beatrice A. Bakhmet, Anastasia A. Klochkova, Svetlana V. Velichko, Ellina V. Tiunova, Natalia Tarasenko, Svetlana V. |
author_facet | Pcheliakov, Alexey A. Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu. Vasil’ev, Yuriy L. Svitich, Oxana A. Poddubikov, Alexander V. Evlashin, Stanislav A. Volel, Beatrice A. Bakhmet, Anastasia A. Klochkova, Svetlana V. Velichko, Ellina V. Tiunova, Natalia Tarasenko, Svetlana V. |
author_sort | Pcheliakov, Alexey A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- and polyfilament suture materials used in tooth extraction operations. The study of elongation and knot force was carried out on an Instron 5969 Dual Column Testing System device. The capillarity of the materials was studied on a setup assembled by the authors manually by immersing the ends of the filaments in a colored manganese solution. A microbiological study was carried out on the threads taken for the experiment immediately after wound suturing, and on day 7, at which time they were removed. The comparison was made according to Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results: monofilament suture materials (Prolene and Glycolon), after calculating the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney indices, showed better performance in all experiments compared to polyfilament sutures (Vicryl and PGA). In capillarity comparison, there was a significant difference between groups (p = 0.00018). According to the sum of the results of three microbiological studies on day 7, monofilament suture materials absorbed less of the studied bacteria on their surface compared to the polyfilament ones (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Of the studied suture materials, Prolene had the best microbiological resistance and good mechanical properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10046333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100463332023-03-29 Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” Pcheliakov, Alexey A. Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu. Vasil’ev, Yuriy L. Svitich, Oxana A. Poddubikov, Alexander V. Evlashin, Stanislav A. Volel, Beatrice A. Bakhmet, Anastasia A. Klochkova, Svetlana V. Velichko, Ellina V. Tiunova, Natalia Tarasenko, Svetlana V. Biomimetics (Basel) Article In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- and polyfilament suture materials used in tooth extraction operations. The study of elongation and knot force was carried out on an Instron 5969 Dual Column Testing System device. The capillarity of the materials was studied on a setup assembled by the authors manually by immersing the ends of the filaments in a colored manganese solution. A microbiological study was carried out on the threads taken for the experiment immediately after wound suturing, and on day 7, at which time they were removed. The comparison was made according to Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results: monofilament suture materials (Prolene and Glycolon), after calculating the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney indices, showed better performance in all experiments compared to polyfilament sutures (Vicryl and PGA). In capillarity comparison, there was a significant difference between groups (p = 0.00018). According to the sum of the results of three microbiological studies on day 7, monofilament suture materials absorbed less of the studied bacteria on their surface compared to the polyfilament ones (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Of the studied suture materials, Prolene had the best microbiological resistance and good mechanical properties. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10046333/ /pubmed/36975359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010129 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pcheliakov, Alexey A. Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu. Vasil’ev, Yuriy L. Svitich, Oxana A. Poddubikov, Alexander V. Evlashin, Stanislav A. Volel, Beatrice A. Bakhmet, Anastasia A. Klochkova, Svetlana V. Velichko, Ellina V. Tiunova, Natalia Tarasenko, Svetlana V. Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
title | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
title_sort | comparative analysis of mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of polyfilament and monofilament suture materials used in the operation “tooth extraction” |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pcheliakovalexeya comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT diachkovaekaterinayu comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT vasilevyuriyl comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT svitichoxanaa comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT poddubikovalexanderv comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT evlashinstanislava comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT volelbeatricea comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT bakhmetanastasiaa comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT klochkovasvetlanav comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT velichkoellinav comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT tiunovanatalia comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT tarasenkosvetlanav comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction |