Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”

In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pcheliakov, Alexey A., Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu., Vasil’ev, Yuriy L., Svitich, Oxana A., Poddubikov, Alexander V., Evlashin, Stanislav A., Volel, Beatrice A., Bakhmet, Anastasia A., Klochkova, Svetlana V., Velichko, Ellina V., Tiunova, Natalia, Tarasenko, Svetlana V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010129
_version_ 1785013646631370752
author Pcheliakov, Alexey A.
Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu.
Vasil’ev, Yuriy L.
Svitich, Oxana A.
Poddubikov, Alexander V.
Evlashin, Stanislav A.
Volel, Beatrice A.
Bakhmet, Anastasia A.
Klochkova, Svetlana V.
Velichko, Ellina V.
Tiunova, Natalia
Tarasenko, Svetlana V.
author_facet Pcheliakov, Alexey A.
Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu.
Vasil’ev, Yuriy L.
Svitich, Oxana A.
Poddubikov, Alexander V.
Evlashin, Stanislav A.
Volel, Beatrice A.
Bakhmet, Anastasia A.
Klochkova, Svetlana V.
Velichko, Ellina V.
Tiunova, Natalia
Tarasenko, Svetlana V.
author_sort Pcheliakov, Alexey A.
collection PubMed
description In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- and polyfilament suture materials used in tooth extraction operations. The study of elongation and knot force was carried out on an Instron 5969 Dual Column Testing System device. The capillarity of the materials was studied on a setup assembled by the authors manually by immersing the ends of the filaments in a colored manganese solution. A microbiological study was carried out on the threads taken for the experiment immediately after wound suturing, and on day 7, at which time they were removed. The comparison was made according to Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results: monofilament suture materials (Prolene and Glycolon), after calculating the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney indices, showed better performance in all experiments compared to polyfilament sutures (Vicryl and PGA). In capillarity comparison, there was a significant difference between groups (p = 0.00018). According to the sum of the results of three microbiological studies on day 7, monofilament suture materials absorbed less of the studied bacteria on their surface compared to the polyfilament ones (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Of the studied suture materials, Prolene had the best microbiological resistance and good mechanical properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10046333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100463332023-03-29 Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” Pcheliakov, Alexey A. Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu. Vasil’ev, Yuriy L. Svitich, Oxana A. Poddubikov, Alexander V. Evlashin, Stanislav A. Volel, Beatrice A. Bakhmet, Anastasia A. Klochkova, Svetlana V. Velichko, Ellina V. Tiunova, Natalia Tarasenko, Svetlana V. Biomimetics (Basel) Article In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- and polyfilament suture materials used in tooth extraction operations. The study of elongation and knot force was carried out on an Instron 5969 Dual Column Testing System device. The capillarity of the materials was studied on a setup assembled by the authors manually by immersing the ends of the filaments in a colored manganese solution. A microbiological study was carried out on the threads taken for the experiment immediately after wound suturing, and on day 7, at which time they were removed. The comparison was made according to Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results: monofilament suture materials (Prolene and Glycolon), after calculating the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney indices, showed better performance in all experiments compared to polyfilament sutures (Vicryl and PGA). In capillarity comparison, there was a significant difference between groups (p = 0.00018). According to the sum of the results of three microbiological studies on day 7, monofilament suture materials absorbed less of the studied bacteria on their surface compared to the polyfilament ones (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Of the studied suture materials, Prolene had the best microbiological resistance and good mechanical properties. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10046333/ /pubmed/36975359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010129 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pcheliakov, Alexey A.
Diachkova, Ekaterina Yu.
Vasil’ev, Yuriy L.
Svitich, Oxana A.
Poddubikov, Alexander V.
Evlashin, Stanislav A.
Volel, Beatrice A.
Bakhmet, Anastasia A.
Klochkova, Svetlana V.
Velichko, Ellina V.
Tiunova, Natalia
Tarasenko, Svetlana V.
Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
title Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
title_full Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
title_short Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
title_sort comparative analysis of mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of polyfilament and monofilament suture materials used in the operation “tooth extraction”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010129
work_keys_str_mv AT pcheliakovalexeya comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT diachkovaekaterinayu comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT vasilevyuriyl comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT svitichoxanaa comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT poddubikovalexanderv comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT evlashinstanislava comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT volelbeatricea comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT bakhmetanastasiaa comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT klochkovasvetlanav comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT velichkoellinav comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT tiunovanatalia comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction
AT tarasenkosvetlanav comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction