Cargando…

The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures

Objective: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer is a recently launched versatile arthrometer that can be used for the quantitative assessment of knee and ankle joint laxity. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ligs Digital Arthrometer for the diagnosis of complete anterior cruciate ligament (AC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Junqiao, Tang, Jiexi, Yao, Lei, Fu, Weili, Deng, Qian, Xiong, Yan, Li, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1049100
_version_ 1785013767316176896
author Li, Junqiao
Tang, Jiexi
Yao, Lei
Fu, Weili
Deng, Qian
Xiong, Yan
Li, Jian
author_facet Li, Junqiao
Tang, Jiexi
Yao, Lei
Fu, Weili
Deng, Qian
Xiong, Yan
Li, Jian
author_sort Li, Junqiao
collection PubMed
description Objective: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer is a recently launched versatile arthrometer that can be used for the quantitative assessment of knee and ankle joint laxity. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ligs Digital Arthrometer for the diagnosis of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures at different loads. Materials and Methods: From March 2020 to February 2021, we included 114 normal subjects and 132 subjects diagnosed with complete ACL ruptures by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and eventually confirmed by arthroscopy in the study. Anterior knee laxity was independently measured by the same physical therapist using the Ligs Digital Arthrometer. Recorded anterior knee laxity and calculated the side-to-side difference (SSD) at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 N loads, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal laxity threshold, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The demographic data of the subjects were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean values of anterior knee laxity measured by the Ligs Digital Arthrometer between the complete ACL ruptures group and the control group were significantly different at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 N loads (p < 0.001 for all). According to the results of ROC curve analysis, the optimal laxity threshold for the diagnosis of complete ACL ruptures was 1.1 mm SSD (Se = 66.7%, Sp = 69.3%) at 30 N, 1.3 mm (Se = 74.2%, Sp = 82.5%) at 60 N, 1.6 mm (Se = 79.5%, Sp = 94.7%) at 90 N, 1.9 mm (Se = 84.1%, Sp = 92.1%) at 120 N and 2.1 mm (Se = 85.6%, Sp = 91.2%) at 150 N. The AUC order at different loads from high to low was 150 N (0.948 [0.923–0.973])>120 N (0.933 [0.903–0.963])>90 N (0.902 [0.862–0.943])>60 N (0.846 [0.799–0.893])>30 N (0.720 [0.657–0.783]). Conclusion: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer proved to be of high diagnostic value in complete ACL ruptures at 90 N, 120 N, and 150 N loads. The diagnostic value improved with the increase of load in a certain range. Based on the results of this study, as a portable, digital and versatile new arthrometer, the Ligs Digital Arthrometer was a valid and promising tool for diagnosing complete ACL ruptures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10046814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100468142023-03-29 The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures Li, Junqiao Tang, Jiexi Yao, Lei Fu, Weili Deng, Qian Xiong, Yan Li, Jian Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer is a recently launched versatile arthrometer that can be used for the quantitative assessment of knee and ankle joint laxity. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ligs Digital Arthrometer for the diagnosis of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures at different loads. Materials and Methods: From March 2020 to February 2021, we included 114 normal subjects and 132 subjects diagnosed with complete ACL ruptures by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and eventually confirmed by arthroscopy in the study. Anterior knee laxity was independently measured by the same physical therapist using the Ligs Digital Arthrometer. Recorded anterior knee laxity and calculated the side-to-side difference (SSD) at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 N loads, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal laxity threshold, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The demographic data of the subjects were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean values of anterior knee laxity measured by the Ligs Digital Arthrometer between the complete ACL ruptures group and the control group were significantly different at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 N loads (p < 0.001 for all). According to the results of ROC curve analysis, the optimal laxity threshold for the diagnosis of complete ACL ruptures was 1.1 mm SSD (Se = 66.7%, Sp = 69.3%) at 30 N, 1.3 mm (Se = 74.2%, Sp = 82.5%) at 60 N, 1.6 mm (Se = 79.5%, Sp = 94.7%) at 90 N, 1.9 mm (Se = 84.1%, Sp = 92.1%) at 120 N and 2.1 mm (Se = 85.6%, Sp = 91.2%) at 150 N. The AUC order at different loads from high to low was 150 N (0.948 [0.923–0.973])>120 N (0.933 [0.903–0.963])>90 N (0.902 [0.862–0.943])>60 N (0.846 [0.799–0.893])>30 N (0.720 [0.657–0.783]). Conclusion: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer proved to be of high diagnostic value in complete ACL ruptures at 90 N, 120 N, and 150 N loads. The diagnostic value improved with the increase of load in a certain range. Based on the results of this study, as a portable, digital and versatile new arthrometer, the Ligs Digital Arthrometer was a valid and promising tool for diagnosing complete ACL ruptures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10046814/ /pubmed/36998807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1049100 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Tang, Yao, Fu, Deng, Xiong and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Li, Junqiao
Tang, Jiexi
Yao, Lei
Fu, Weili
Deng, Qian
Xiong, Yan
Li, Jian
The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures
title The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures
title_full The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures
title_fullStr The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures
title_full_unstemmed The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures
title_short The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures
title_sort validity of the ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete acl ruptures
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1049100
work_keys_str_mv AT lijunqiao thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT tangjiexi thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT yaolei thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT fuweili thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT dengqian thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT xiongyan thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT lijian thevalidityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT lijunqiao validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT tangjiexi validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT yaolei validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT fuweili validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT dengqian validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT xiongyan validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures
AT lijian validityoftheligsdigitalarthrometeratdifferentloadstoevaluatecompleteaclruptures