Cargando…

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The adequate distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might be tighter than expected. Patients with a distal margin of ≤1 mm vs. >1 mm were compared: while a distal margin of ≤1 mm may be sufficient in case of major/complete response, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sorrentino, Luca, Sileo, Annaclara, Daveri, Elena, Battaglia, Luigi, Guaglio, Marcello, Centonze, Giovanni, Sabella, Giovanna, Patti, Filippo, Villa, Sergio, Milione, Massimo, Belli, Filiberto, Cosimelli, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061828
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: The adequate distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might be tighter than expected. Patients with a distal margin of ≤1 mm vs. >1 mm were compared: while a distal margin of ≤1 mm may be sufficient in case of major/complete response, a margin of >1 mm is still required to avoid locoregional recurrence in patients with a low response to neoadjuvant treatment. The findings of the present study might also increase the rate of sphincter-preserving rectal surgery in patients with a close/microscopically positive distal margin and a major/complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. ABSTRACT: Background: The adequate distal resection margin is still controversial in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a distal margin of ≤1 mm on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). Methods: Among 255 patients treated with nCRT and surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan, 83 (32.5%) had a distal margin of ≤1 mm and 172 (67.5%) had a distal margin of >1 mm. Survival analyses were performed to assess the impact of distal margin on 5-year LRRFS, as well as Cox survival analysis. The role of distal margin on survival was analyzed according to different tumor regression grades (TRGs). Results: The overall 5-year LRRFS rate was 77.6% with a distal margin of ≤1 mm vs. 88.3% with a distal margin of >1 mm (Log-rank p = 0.09). Only stage ypT4 was an independent predictor of worse LRRFS (HR 15.14, p = 0.026). The 5-year LRRFS was significantly lower in TRG3–5 patients with a distal margin of ≤1 mm compared to those with a distal margin of >1 mm (68.5% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.027), while no difference was observed in case of TRG1–2 (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Low-responder rectal cancers after nCRT still require a distal margin of >1 mm to reduce the high likelihood of local relapse.