Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps

(1) Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of prototype handheld ultrasound compared to automated breast ultrasound, according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS categorization, among females with positive lumps. (2) Methods: A total of 1004 lesions in 162 participants who underwent both pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibraheem, Shahad A., Mahmud, Rozi, Mohamad Saini, Suraini, Abu Hassan, Hasyma, Keiteb, Aysar Sabah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061065
_version_ 1785013874558238720
author Ibraheem, Shahad A.
Mahmud, Rozi
Mohamad Saini, Suraini
Abu Hassan, Hasyma
Keiteb, Aysar Sabah
author_facet Ibraheem, Shahad A.
Mahmud, Rozi
Mohamad Saini, Suraini
Abu Hassan, Hasyma
Keiteb, Aysar Sabah
author_sort Ibraheem, Shahad A.
collection PubMed
description (1) Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of prototype handheld ultrasound compared to automated breast ultrasound, according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS categorization, among females with positive lumps. (2) Methods: A total of 1004 lesions in 162 participants who underwent both prototype handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound were included. Two radiologists and a sonographer independently evaluated the sonographic features of each lesion according to the fifth BI-RADS edition. The kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated for each BI-RADS descriptor and final assessment category. The cross-tabulation was performed to see whether there were differences between the ABUS and prototype HHUS results. Specificity and sensitivity were evaluated and compared using the McNamar test. (3) Results: ABUS and prototype HHUS observers found the same number of breast lesions in the 324 breasts of the 162 respondents. There was no significant difference in the mean lesion size, with a maximum mean length dimension of 0.48 ± 0.33 cm. The assessment of the lesion’s shape, orientation, margin, echo pattern, posterior acoustic features, and calcification was obtained with good to excellent agreements between ABUS and prototype HHUS observers (κ = 0.70–1.0). There was absolutely no significant difference between ABUS and prototype HHUS in assessment of lesion except for lesion orientation p = 0.00. Diagnostic accuracy (99.8% and 97.7–98.9%), sensitivity (99.5% and 98.0–99.0%), specificity (99.8% and 99.6–99.8%), positive predictive value (98.1% and 90.3–96.2%), negative predictive value (90.0% and 84.4–88.7%), and areas under the curve (0.98 and 0.83–0.92; p < 0.05) were not significantly different between ABUS and prototype HHUS observers. (4) Conclusion: According to the fifth BI-RADS edition, automated breast ultrasound is not statistically significantly different from prototype handheld ultrasound with regard to interobserver variability and diagnostic performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10047253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100472532023-03-29 Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps Ibraheem, Shahad A. Mahmud, Rozi Mohamad Saini, Suraini Abu Hassan, Hasyma Keiteb, Aysar Sabah Diagnostics (Basel) Article (1) Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of prototype handheld ultrasound compared to automated breast ultrasound, according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS categorization, among females with positive lumps. (2) Methods: A total of 1004 lesions in 162 participants who underwent both prototype handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound were included. Two radiologists and a sonographer independently evaluated the sonographic features of each lesion according to the fifth BI-RADS edition. The kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated for each BI-RADS descriptor and final assessment category. The cross-tabulation was performed to see whether there were differences between the ABUS and prototype HHUS results. Specificity and sensitivity were evaluated and compared using the McNamar test. (3) Results: ABUS and prototype HHUS observers found the same number of breast lesions in the 324 breasts of the 162 respondents. There was no significant difference in the mean lesion size, with a maximum mean length dimension of 0.48 ± 0.33 cm. The assessment of the lesion’s shape, orientation, margin, echo pattern, posterior acoustic features, and calcification was obtained with good to excellent agreements between ABUS and prototype HHUS observers (κ = 0.70–1.0). There was absolutely no significant difference between ABUS and prototype HHUS in assessment of lesion except for lesion orientation p = 0.00. Diagnostic accuracy (99.8% and 97.7–98.9%), sensitivity (99.5% and 98.0–99.0%), specificity (99.8% and 99.6–99.8%), positive predictive value (98.1% and 90.3–96.2%), negative predictive value (90.0% and 84.4–88.7%), and areas under the curve (0.98 and 0.83–0.92; p < 0.05) were not significantly different between ABUS and prototype HHUS observers. (4) Conclusion: According to the fifth BI-RADS edition, automated breast ultrasound is not statistically significantly different from prototype handheld ultrasound with regard to interobserver variability and diagnostic performance. MDPI 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10047253/ /pubmed/36980373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061065 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ibraheem, Shahad A.
Mahmud, Rozi
Mohamad Saini, Suraini
Abu Hassan, Hasyma
Keiteb, Aysar Sabah
Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
title Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps
title_sort diagnostic performance of prototype handheld ultrasound according to the fifth edition of bi-rads for breast ultrasound compared with automated breast ultrasound among females with positive lumps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061065
work_keys_str_mv AT ibraheemshahada diagnosticperformanceofprototypehandheldultrasoundaccordingtothefiftheditionofbiradsforbreastultrasoundcomparedwithautomatedbreastultrasoundamongfemaleswithpositivelumps
AT mahmudrozi diagnosticperformanceofprototypehandheldultrasoundaccordingtothefiftheditionofbiradsforbreastultrasoundcomparedwithautomatedbreastultrasoundamongfemaleswithpositivelumps
AT mohamadsainisuraini diagnosticperformanceofprototypehandheldultrasoundaccordingtothefiftheditionofbiradsforbreastultrasoundcomparedwithautomatedbreastultrasoundamongfemaleswithpositivelumps
AT abuhassanhasyma diagnosticperformanceofprototypehandheldultrasoundaccordingtothefiftheditionofbiradsforbreastultrasoundcomparedwithautomatedbreastultrasoundamongfemaleswithpositivelumps
AT keitebaysarsabah diagnosticperformanceofprototypehandheldultrasoundaccordingtothefiftheditionofbiradsforbreastultrasoundcomparedwithautomatedbreastultrasoundamongfemaleswithpositivelumps