Cargando…

The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature

The development of precise medical imaging has facilitated the establishment of radiomics, a computer-based method of quantitatively analyzing subvisual imaging characteristics. The present review summarizes the current literature on the use of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huynh, Linda My, Hwang, Yeagyeong, Taylor, Olivia, Baine, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061128
_version_ 1785013879087038464
author Huynh, Linda My
Hwang, Yeagyeong
Taylor, Olivia
Baine, Michael J.
author_facet Huynh, Linda My
Hwang, Yeagyeong
Taylor, Olivia
Baine, Michael J.
author_sort Huynh, Linda My
collection PubMed
description The development of precise medical imaging has facilitated the establishment of radiomics, a computer-based method of quantitatively analyzing subvisual imaging characteristics. The present review summarizes the current literature on the use of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomics in prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification. A stepwise literature search of publications from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Of 218 articles on MRI-derived prostate radiomics, 33 (15.1%) generated models for PCa risk stratification. Prediction of Gleason score (GS), adverse pathology, postsurgical recurrence, and postradiation failure were the primary endpoints in 15 (45.5%), 11 (33.3%), 4 (12.1%), and 3 (9.1%) studies. In predicting GS and adverse pathology, radiomic models differentiated well, with receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) values of 0.50–0.92 and 0.60–0.92, respectively. For studies predicting post-treatment recurrence or failure, ROC-AUC for radiomic models ranged from 0.73 to 0.99 in postsurgical and radiation cohorts. Finally, of the 33 studies, 7 (21.2%) included external validation. Overall, most investigations showed good to excellent prediction of GS and adverse pathology with MRI-derived radiomic features. Direct prediction of treatment outcomes, however, is an ongoing investigation. As these studies mature and reach potential for clinical integration, concerted effort to validate these radiomic models must be undertaken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10047271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100472712023-03-29 The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature Huynh, Linda My Hwang, Yeagyeong Taylor, Olivia Baine, Michael J. Diagnostics (Basel) Review The development of precise medical imaging has facilitated the establishment of radiomics, a computer-based method of quantitatively analyzing subvisual imaging characteristics. The present review summarizes the current literature on the use of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomics in prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification. A stepwise literature search of publications from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Of 218 articles on MRI-derived prostate radiomics, 33 (15.1%) generated models for PCa risk stratification. Prediction of Gleason score (GS), adverse pathology, postsurgical recurrence, and postradiation failure were the primary endpoints in 15 (45.5%), 11 (33.3%), 4 (12.1%), and 3 (9.1%) studies. In predicting GS and adverse pathology, radiomic models differentiated well, with receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) values of 0.50–0.92 and 0.60–0.92, respectively. For studies predicting post-treatment recurrence or failure, ROC-AUC for radiomic models ranged from 0.73 to 0.99 in postsurgical and radiation cohorts. Finally, of the 33 studies, 7 (21.2%) included external validation. Overall, most investigations showed good to excellent prediction of GS and adverse pathology with MRI-derived radiomic features. Direct prediction of treatment outcomes, however, is an ongoing investigation. As these studies mature and reach potential for clinical integration, concerted effort to validate these radiomic models must be undertaken. MDPI 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10047271/ /pubmed/36980436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061128 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Huynh, Linda My
Hwang, Yeagyeong
Taylor, Olivia
Baine, Michael J.
The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature
title The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature
title_full The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature
title_fullStr The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature
title_full_unstemmed The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature
title_short The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature
title_sort use of mri-derived radiomic models in prostate cancer risk stratification: a critical review of contemporary literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061128
work_keys_str_mv AT huynhlindamy theuseofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT hwangyeagyeong theuseofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT taylorolivia theuseofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT bainemichaelj theuseofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT huynhlindamy useofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT hwangyeagyeong useofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT taylorolivia useofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature
AT bainemichaelj useofmriderivedradiomicmodelsinprostatecancerriskstratificationacriticalreviewofcontemporaryliterature