Cargando…

Leveraging Deep Learning Decision-Support System in Specialized Oncology Center: A Multi-Reader Retrospective Study on Detection of Pulmonary Lesions in Chest X-ray Images

Chest X-ray (CXR) is considered to be the most widely used modality for detecting and monitoring various thoracic findings, including lung carcinoma and other pulmonary lesions. However, X-ray imaging shows particular limitations when detecting primary and secondary tumors and is prone to reading er...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kvak, Daniel, Chromcová, Anna, Hrubý, Robert, Janů, Eva, Biroš, Marek, Pajdaković, Marija, Kvaková, Karolína, Al-antari, Mugahed A., Polášková, Pavlína, Strukov, Sergei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061043
Descripción
Sumario:Chest X-ray (CXR) is considered to be the most widely used modality for detecting and monitoring various thoracic findings, including lung carcinoma and other pulmonary lesions. However, X-ray imaging shows particular limitations when detecting primary and secondary tumors and is prone to reading errors due to limited resolution and disagreement between radiologists. To address these issues, we developed a deep-learning-based automatic detection algorithm (DLAD) to automatically detect and localize suspicious lesions on CXRs. Five radiologists were invited to retrospectively evaluate 300 CXR images from a specialized oncology center, and the performance of individual radiologists was subsequently compared with that of DLAD. The proposed DLAD achieved significantly higher sensitivity (0.910 (0.854–0.966)) than that of all assessed radiologists (RAD 10.290 (0.201–0.379), p < 0.001, RAD 20.450 (0.352–0.548), p < 0.001, RAD 30.670 (0.578–0.762), p < 0.001, RAD 40.810 (0.733–0.887), p = 0.025, RAD 50.700 (0.610–0.790), p < 0.001). The DLAD specificity (0.775 (0.717–0.833)) was significantly lower than for all assessed radiologists (RAD 11.000 (0.984–1.000), p < 0.001, RAD 20.970 (0.946–1.000), p < 0.001, RAD 30.980 (0.961–1.000), p < 0.001, RAD 40.975 (0.953–0.997), p < 0.001, RAD 50.995 (0.985–1.000), p < 0.001). The study results demonstrate that the proposed DLAD could be utilized as a decision-support system to reduce radiologists’ false negative rate.