Cargando…

Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach

Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Add...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael, Sánchez, María José, Gómez-Rojas, Sandra, Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel, Segura, Gloria Pérez, Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel, CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo, Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez, Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco, Jiménez, Pilar, Alonso, Rafael, Lahuerta, Juan José, Martínez-López, Joaquín, Duarte, Rafael F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071
_version_ 1785013895489912832
author Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael
Sánchez, María José
Gómez-Rojas, Sandra
Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel
Segura, Gloria Pérez
Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel
CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo
Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez
Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco
Jiménez, Pilar
Alonso, Rafael
Lahuerta, Juan José
Martínez-López, Joaquín
Duarte, Rafael F.
author_facet Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael
Sánchez, María José
Gómez-Rojas, Sandra
Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel
Segura, Gloria Pérez
Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel
CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo
Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez
Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco
Jiménez, Pilar
Alonso, Rafael
Lahuerta, Juan José
Martínez-López, Joaquín
Duarte, Rafael F.
author_sort Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael
collection PubMed
description Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10047335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100473352023-03-29 Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael Sánchez, María José Gómez-Rojas, Sandra Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel Segura, Gloria Pérez Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco Jiménez, Pilar Alonso, Rafael Lahuerta, Juan José Martínez-López, Joaquín Duarte, Rafael F. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples. MDPI 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10047335/ /pubmed/36980379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael
Sánchez, María José
Gómez-Rojas, Sandra
Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel
Segura, Gloria Pérez
Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel
CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo
Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez
Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco
Jiménez, Pilar
Alonso, Rafael
Lahuerta, Juan José
Martínez-López, Joaquín
Duarte, Rafael F.
Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
title Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
title_full Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
title_fullStr Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
title_full_unstemmed Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
title_short Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
title_sort cell count differentials by cytomorphology and next-generation flow cytometry in bone marrow aspirate: an evidence-based approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071
work_keys_str_mv AT riostamayorafael cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT sanchezmariajose cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT gomezrojassandra cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT rodriguezbarrancomiguel cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT seguragloriaperez cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT redondosanchezdaniel cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT carrenotarragonagonzalo cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT nicolasantoniorodriguez cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT ruizcabellofrancisco cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT jimenezpilar cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT alonsorafael cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT lahuertajuanjose cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT martinezlopezjoaquin cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach
AT duarterafaelf cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach