Cargando…
Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach
Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Add...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071 |
_version_ | 1785013895489912832 |
---|---|
author | Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael Sánchez, María José Gómez-Rojas, Sandra Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel Segura, Gloria Pérez Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco Jiménez, Pilar Alonso, Rafael Lahuerta, Juan José Martínez-López, Joaquín Duarte, Rafael F. |
author_facet | Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael Sánchez, María José Gómez-Rojas, Sandra Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel Segura, Gloria Pérez Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco Jiménez, Pilar Alonso, Rafael Lahuerta, Juan José Martínez-López, Joaquín Duarte, Rafael F. |
author_sort | Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10047335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100473352023-03-29 Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael Sánchez, María José Gómez-Rojas, Sandra Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel Segura, Gloria Pérez Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco Jiménez, Pilar Alonso, Rafael Lahuerta, Juan José Martínez-López, Joaquín Duarte, Rafael F. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples. MDPI 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10047335/ /pubmed/36980379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael Sánchez, María José Gómez-Rojas, Sandra Rodríguez-Barranco, Miguel Segura, Gloria Pérez Redondo-Sánchez, Daniel CARREÑO-TARRAGONA, Gonzalo Nicolás, Antonio Rodríguez Ruiz-Cabello, Francisco Jiménez, Pilar Alonso, Rafael Lahuerta, Juan José Martínez-López, Joaquín Duarte, Rafael F. Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach |
title | Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach |
title_full | Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach |
title_fullStr | Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach |
title_short | Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach |
title_sort | cell count differentials by cytomorphology and next-generation flow cytometry in bone marrow aspirate: an evidence-based approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riostamayorafael cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT sanchezmariajose cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT gomezrojassandra cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT rodriguezbarrancomiguel cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT seguragloriaperez cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT redondosanchezdaniel cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT carrenotarragonagonzalo cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT nicolasantoniorodriguez cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT ruizcabellofrancisco cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT jimenezpilar cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT alonsorafael cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT lahuertajuanjose cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT martinezlopezjoaquin cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach AT duarterafaelf cellcountdifferentialsbycytomorphologyandnextgenerationflowcytometryinbonemarrowaspirateanevidencebasedapproach |