Cargando…

Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners

The aim of this study was to evaluate the masticatory function of subjects with clear aligners and to propose a simple and repeatable method for the clinical and experimental evaluation of masticatory function. For the testing we used almonds, a natural substance that can be easily found and stored,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levrini, Luca, Bocchieri, Salvatore, Mauceri, Federico, Saran, Stefano, Carganico, Andrea, Zecca, Piero Antonio, Segù, Marzia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975565
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11030068
_version_ 1785013899813191680
author Levrini, Luca
Bocchieri, Salvatore
Mauceri, Federico
Saran, Stefano
Carganico, Andrea
Zecca, Piero Antonio
Segù, Marzia
author_facet Levrini, Luca
Bocchieri, Salvatore
Mauceri, Federico
Saran, Stefano
Carganico, Andrea
Zecca, Piero Antonio
Segù, Marzia
author_sort Levrini, Luca
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the masticatory function of subjects with clear aligners and to propose a simple and repeatable method for the clinical and experimental evaluation of masticatory function. For the testing we used almonds, a natural substance that can be easily found and stored, has intermediate consistency and hardness, is insoluble in saliva, and has the ability easily lose the moisture absorbed in the mouth. Thirty-four subjects using the Invisalign(®) (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) protocol were randomly selected. This was an “intercontrol test”, i.e., all subjects under the same conditions acted as controls but also as cases whilst wearing the clear aligners. Patients were asked to chew an almond for 20 s, once with aligners and once without aligners. The material was then dried, sieved, and weighted. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate any significative differences. In all our subjects, the efficiency of chewing with clear aligners was found to be comparable to the efficiency of chewing without clear aligners. In detail, the average weight after drying was 0.62 g without aligners and 0.69 g with aligners, while after sieving at 1 mm, the average weight was 0.08 g without aligners and 0.06 g with aligners. The average variation after drying was of 12%, and after sieving at 1 mm, it was 25%. In summary, there was no substantial difference between chewing with or without clear aligners. Despite some discomfort in chewing, the clear aligners were well tolerated by most subjects, who wore them without difficulty even during meals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10047352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100473522023-03-29 Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners Levrini, Luca Bocchieri, Salvatore Mauceri, Federico Saran, Stefano Carganico, Andrea Zecca, Piero Antonio Segù, Marzia Dent J (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the masticatory function of subjects with clear aligners and to propose a simple and repeatable method for the clinical and experimental evaluation of masticatory function. For the testing we used almonds, a natural substance that can be easily found and stored, has intermediate consistency and hardness, is insoluble in saliva, and has the ability easily lose the moisture absorbed in the mouth. Thirty-four subjects using the Invisalign(®) (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) protocol were randomly selected. This was an “intercontrol test”, i.e., all subjects under the same conditions acted as controls but also as cases whilst wearing the clear aligners. Patients were asked to chew an almond for 20 s, once with aligners and once without aligners. The material was then dried, sieved, and weighted. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate any significative differences. In all our subjects, the efficiency of chewing with clear aligners was found to be comparable to the efficiency of chewing without clear aligners. In detail, the average weight after drying was 0.62 g without aligners and 0.69 g with aligners, while after sieving at 1 mm, the average weight was 0.08 g without aligners and 0.06 g with aligners. The average variation after drying was of 12%, and after sieving at 1 mm, it was 25%. In summary, there was no substantial difference between chewing with or without clear aligners. Despite some discomfort in chewing, the clear aligners were well tolerated by most subjects, who wore them without difficulty even during meals. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10047352/ /pubmed/36975565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11030068 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Levrini, Luca
Bocchieri, Salvatore
Mauceri, Federico
Saran, Stefano
Carganico, Andrea
Zecca, Piero Antonio
Segù, Marzia
Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners
title Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners
title_full Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners
title_fullStr Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners
title_full_unstemmed Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners
title_short Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners
title_sort chewing efficiency test in subjects with clear aligners
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975565
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11030068
work_keys_str_mv AT levriniluca chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners
AT bocchierisalvatore chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners
AT maucerifederico chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners
AT saranstefano chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners
AT carganicoandrea chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners
AT zeccapieroantonio chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners
AT segumarzia chewingefficiencytestinsubjectswithclearaligners