Cargando…

Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: General practice is well situated to promote physical activity (PA), but with PA levels declining after 45 years of age, often those who are most likely to benefit from interventions tend to be the least likely recruited to participate in research. AIMS AND RATIONALE: The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNamara, Richard, Davy, Kimberly, Niranjan, Vikram, O’Regan, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac128
_version_ 1785013969282400256
author McNamara, Richard
Davy, Kimberly
Niranjan, Vikram
O’Regan, Andrew
author_facet McNamara, Richard
Davy, Kimberly
Niranjan, Vikram
O’Regan, Andrew
author_sort McNamara, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General practice is well situated to promote physical activity (PA), but with PA levels declining after 45 years of age, often those who are most likely to benefit from interventions tend to be the least likely recruited to participate in research. AIMS AND RATIONALE: The aim of this study was to investigate recruitment and reporting of participant demographics in PA trials for adults aged 45 years and above. Specific objectives were: (i) to examine the reporting of demographics of participants; (ii) to investigate the strategies used to recruit these participants; and, (iii) to examine the efficiency of recruitment strategies. METHODS: Seven databases were searched, including: PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Only randomized control trials involving adults 45 years old or older recruited through primary care were included. The PRISMA framework for systematic review was followed, which involved 2 researchers independently conducting title, abstract, and full article screening. Tools for data extraction and synthesis were adapted from previous work on inclusivity in recruitment. RESULTS: The searches retrieved 3,491 studies of which 12 were included for review. Sample size of the studies ranged from 31 to 1,366, with a total of 6,042 participants of which 57% were female. Of 101 participating practices, 1 was reported as rural. Reporting of recruitment lacked detail—only 6 studies outlined how practices were recruited. 11/12 studies involved a database or chart review to identify participants that met the inclusion criteria, followed by a letter of invitation sent to those people. The studies with higher recruitment efficiency ratios each employed more than 1 recruitment strategy, e.g. opportunistic invitations and telephone calls. CONCLUSION: This systematic review has presented deficits in the reporting of both demographics and recruitment. Future research should aim for a standardized approach to reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10047612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100476122023-03-29 Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review McNamara, Richard Davy, Kimberly Niranjan, Vikram O’Regan, Andrew Fam Pract Systematic Review BACKGROUND: General practice is well situated to promote physical activity (PA), but with PA levels declining after 45 years of age, often those who are most likely to benefit from interventions tend to be the least likely recruited to participate in research. AIMS AND RATIONALE: The aim of this study was to investigate recruitment and reporting of participant demographics in PA trials for adults aged 45 years and above. Specific objectives were: (i) to examine the reporting of demographics of participants; (ii) to investigate the strategies used to recruit these participants; and, (iii) to examine the efficiency of recruitment strategies. METHODS: Seven databases were searched, including: PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Only randomized control trials involving adults 45 years old or older recruited through primary care were included. The PRISMA framework for systematic review was followed, which involved 2 researchers independently conducting title, abstract, and full article screening. Tools for data extraction and synthesis were adapted from previous work on inclusivity in recruitment. RESULTS: The searches retrieved 3,491 studies of which 12 were included for review. Sample size of the studies ranged from 31 to 1,366, with a total of 6,042 participants of which 57% were female. Of 101 participating practices, 1 was reported as rural. Reporting of recruitment lacked detail—only 6 studies outlined how practices were recruited. 11/12 studies involved a database or chart review to identify participants that met the inclusion criteria, followed by a letter of invitation sent to those people. The studies with higher recruitment efficiency ratios each employed more than 1 recruitment strategy, e.g. opportunistic invitations and telephone calls. CONCLUSION: This systematic review has presented deficits in the reporting of both demographics and recruitment. Future research should aim for a standardized approach to reporting. Oxford University Press 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10047612/ /pubmed/36472583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac128 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
McNamara, Richard
Davy, Kimberly
Niranjan, Vikram
O’Regan, Andrew
Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
title Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
title_full Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
title_fullStr Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
title_short Recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
title_sort recruitment and characteristics of participants in trials of physical activity for adults aged 45 years and above in general practice: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac128
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnamararichard recruitmentandcharacteristicsofparticipantsintrialsofphysicalactivityforadultsaged45yearsandaboveingeneralpracticeasystematicreview
AT davykimberly recruitmentandcharacteristicsofparticipantsintrialsofphysicalactivityforadultsaged45yearsandaboveingeneralpracticeasystematicreview
AT niranjanvikram recruitmentandcharacteristicsofparticipantsintrialsofphysicalactivityforadultsaged45yearsandaboveingeneralpracticeasystematicreview
AT oreganandrew recruitmentandcharacteristicsofparticipantsintrialsofphysicalactivityforadultsaged45yearsandaboveingeneralpracticeasystematicreview