Cargando…
Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints
Background: The original observation that lung ultrasound provides information regarding the physical state of the organ, rather than the anatomical details related to the disease, has reinforced the idea that the observed acoustic signs represent artifacts. However, the definition of artifact does...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061139 |
_version_ | 1785013979582562304 |
---|---|
author | Demi, Marcello Soldati, Gino Ramalli, Alessandro |
author_facet | Demi, Marcello Soldati, Gino Ramalli, Alessandro |
author_sort | Demi, Marcello |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The original observation that lung ultrasound provides information regarding the physical state of the organ, rather than the anatomical details related to the disease, has reinforced the idea that the observed acoustic signs represent artifacts. However, the definition of artifact does not appear adequate since pulmonary ultrasound signs have shown valuable diagnostic accuracy, which has been usefully exploited by physicians in numerous pathologies. Method: A specific method has been used over the years to analyze lung ultrasound data and to convert artefactual information into anatomical information. Results: A physical explanation of the genesis of the acoustic signs is provided, and the relationship between their visual characteristics and the surface histopathology of the lung is illustrated. Two important sources of potential signal alteration are also highlighted. Conclusions: The acoustic signs are generated by acoustic traps that progressively release previously trapped energy. Consequently, the acoustic signs highlight the presence of acoustic traps and quantitatively describe their distribution on the lung surface; they are not artifacts, but pathology footprints and anatomical information. Moreover, the impact of the dynamic focusing algorithms and the impact of different probes on the visual aspect of the acoustic signs should not be neglected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10047655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100476552023-03-29 Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints Demi, Marcello Soldati, Gino Ramalli, Alessandro Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The original observation that lung ultrasound provides information regarding the physical state of the organ, rather than the anatomical details related to the disease, has reinforced the idea that the observed acoustic signs represent artifacts. However, the definition of artifact does not appear adequate since pulmonary ultrasound signs have shown valuable diagnostic accuracy, which has been usefully exploited by physicians in numerous pathologies. Method: A specific method has been used over the years to analyze lung ultrasound data and to convert artefactual information into anatomical information. Results: A physical explanation of the genesis of the acoustic signs is provided, and the relationship between their visual characteristics and the surface histopathology of the lung is illustrated. Two important sources of potential signal alteration are also highlighted. Conclusions: The acoustic signs are generated by acoustic traps that progressively release previously trapped energy. Consequently, the acoustic signs highlight the presence of acoustic traps and quantitatively describe their distribution on the lung surface; they are not artifacts, but pathology footprints and anatomical information. Moreover, the impact of the dynamic focusing algorithms and the impact of different probes on the visual aspect of the acoustic signs should not be neglected. MDPI 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10047655/ /pubmed/36980450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061139 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Demi, Marcello Soldati, Gino Ramalli, Alessandro Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints |
title | Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints |
title_full | Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints |
title_fullStr | Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints |
title_short | Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints |
title_sort | lung ultrasound artifacts interpreted as pathology footprints |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demimarcello lungultrasoundartifactsinterpretedaspathologyfootprints AT soldatigino lungultrasoundartifactsinterpretedaspathologyfootprints AT ramallialessandro lungultrasoundartifactsinterpretedaspathologyfootprints |