Cargando…
Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts
Tracheal reconstruction represents a challenge when primary anastomosis is not feasible. Within this scenario, the study aim was to develop a new pig-derived decellularized trachea (DecellT) to be compared with the cryopreserved counterpart (CryoT) for a close predictive analysis. Tracheal segments...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12060888 |
_version_ | 1785014032716005376 |
---|---|
author | Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Mammana, Marco Trojan, Diletta Bianchin, Alice Favaretto, Francesca Contran, Martina Zambello, Giovanni Vogliardi, Andrea Confalonieri, Marta Todros, Silvia Pavan, Piero G. Romanato, Filippo Conconi, Maria Teresa Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Rea, Federico Porzionato, Andrea |
author_facet | Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Mammana, Marco Trojan, Diletta Bianchin, Alice Favaretto, Francesca Contran, Martina Zambello, Giovanni Vogliardi, Andrea Confalonieri, Marta Todros, Silvia Pavan, Piero G. Romanato, Filippo Conconi, Maria Teresa Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Rea, Federico Porzionato, Andrea |
author_sort | Stocco, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tracheal reconstruction represents a challenge when primary anastomosis is not feasible. Within this scenario, the study aim was to develop a new pig-derived decellularized trachea (DecellT) to be compared with the cryopreserved counterpart (CryoT) for a close predictive analysis. Tracheal segments underwent decellularization by a physical + enzymatic + chemical method (12 cycles); in parallel, cryopreserved samples were also prepared. Once decellularized (histology/DNA quantification), the two groups were characterized for Alpha-Gal epitopes/structural proteins (immunohistochemistry/histology/biochemical assays/second harmonic generation microscopy)/ultrastructure (Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM))/mechanical behaviour. Cytotoxicity absence was assessed in vitro (extract-test assay/direct seeding, HM1SV40 cell line) while biocompatibility was verified in BALB/c mice, followed by histological/immunohistochemical analyses and SEM (14 days). Decellularization effectively removed Alpha-Gal epitopes; cartilage histoarchitecture was retained in both groups, showing chondrocytes only in the CryoT. Cryopreservation maintained few respiratory epithelium sparse cilia, not detectable in DecellT. Focusing on ECM, preserved structural/ultrastructural organization and collagen content were observed in the cartilage of both; conversely, the GAGs were significantly reduced in DecellT, as confirmed by mechanical study results. No cytotoxicity was highlighted by CryoT/DecellT in vitro, as they were also corroborated by a biocompatibility assay. Despite some limitations (cells presence/GAGs reduction), CryoT/DecellT are both appealing options, which warrant further investigation in comparative in vivo studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10047860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100478602023-03-29 Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Mammana, Marco Trojan, Diletta Bianchin, Alice Favaretto, Francesca Contran, Martina Zambello, Giovanni Vogliardi, Andrea Confalonieri, Marta Todros, Silvia Pavan, Piero G. Romanato, Filippo Conconi, Maria Teresa Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Rea, Federico Porzionato, Andrea Cells Article Tracheal reconstruction represents a challenge when primary anastomosis is not feasible. Within this scenario, the study aim was to develop a new pig-derived decellularized trachea (DecellT) to be compared with the cryopreserved counterpart (CryoT) for a close predictive analysis. Tracheal segments underwent decellularization by a physical + enzymatic + chemical method (12 cycles); in parallel, cryopreserved samples were also prepared. Once decellularized (histology/DNA quantification), the two groups were characterized for Alpha-Gal epitopes/structural proteins (immunohistochemistry/histology/biochemical assays/second harmonic generation microscopy)/ultrastructure (Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM))/mechanical behaviour. Cytotoxicity absence was assessed in vitro (extract-test assay/direct seeding, HM1SV40 cell line) while biocompatibility was verified in BALB/c mice, followed by histological/immunohistochemical analyses and SEM (14 days). Decellularization effectively removed Alpha-Gal epitopes; cartilage histoarchitecture was retained in both groups, showing chondrocytes only in the CryoT. Cryopreservation maintained few respiratory epithelium sparse cilia, not detectable in DecellT. Focusing on ECM, preserved structural/ultrastructural organization and collagen content were observed in the cartilage of both; conversely, the GAGs were significantly reduced in DecellT, as confirmed by mechanical study results. No cytotoxicity was highlighted by CryoT/DecellT in vitro, as they were also corroborated by a biocompatibility assay. Despite some limitations (cells presence/GAGs reduction), CryoT/DecellT are both appealing options, which warrant further investigation in comparative in vivo studies. MDPI 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10047860/ /pubmed/36980229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12060888 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Mammana, Marco Trojan, Diletta Bianchin, Alice Favaretto, Francesca Contran, Martina Zambello, Giovanni Vogliardi, Andrea Confalonieri, Marta Todros, Silvia Pavan, Piero G. Romanato, Filippo Conconi, Maria Teresa Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Rea, Federico Porzionato, Andrea Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts |
title | Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts |
title_full | Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts |
title_fullStr | Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts |
title_short | Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Comparative Characterization of Cryopreserved and Decellularized Tracheal Grafts |
title_sort | development and in vitro/in vivo comparative characterization of cryopreserved and decellularized tracheal grafts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10047860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12060888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoccoelena developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT barbonsilvia developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT mammanamarco developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT trojandiletta developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT bianchinalice developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT favarettofrancesca developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT contranmartina developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT zambellogiovanni developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT vogliardiandrea developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT confalonierimarta developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT todrossilvia developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT pavanpierog developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT romanatofilippo developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT conconimariateresa developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT macchiveronica developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT decaroraffaele developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT reafederico developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts AT porzionatoandrea developmentandinvitroinvivocomparativecharacterizationofcryopreservedanddecellularizedtrachealgrafts |