Cargando…

Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: In the current healthcare environment, there is a large proportion of female staff of childbearing age, so, according to existing conflicting studies, the teratogenic effects that inhalational anesthetics may have on exposed pregnant workers should be assessed. This investigation aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Álvarez, José Manuel, Escribano-Sánchez, Guillermo, Osuna, Eduardo, Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso, Díaz-Agea, José Luis, García-Sánchez, Alfonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060883
_version_ 1785014132018249728
author García-Álvarez, José Manuel
Escribano-Sánchez, Guillermo
Osuna, Eduardo
Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso
Díaz-Agea, José Luis
García-Sánchez, Alfonso
author_facet García-Álvarez, José Manuel
Escribano-Sánchez, Guillermo
Osuna, Eduardo
Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso
Díaz-Agea, José Luis
García-Sánchez, Alfonso
author_sort García-Álvarez, José Manuel
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: In the current healthcare environment, there is a large proportion of female staff of childbearing age, so, according to existing conflicting studies, the teratogenic effects that inhalational anesthetics may have on exposed pregnant workers should be assessed. This investigation aims to analyze the teratogenic effects of inhalational anesthetics in conditions of actual use, determining any association with spontaneous abortion or congenital malformations. (2) Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement based on PICO (problem of interest–intervention to be considered–intervention compared–outcome) (Do inhalational anesthetics have teratogenic effects in current clinical practice?). The level of evidence of the selected articles was evaluated using the SIGN scale. The databases used were PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google academic and Opengrey. Primary studies conducted in professionals exposed to inhalational anesthetics that evaluate spontaneous abortions or congenital malformations, conducted in any country and language and published within the last ten years were selected. (3) Results: Of the 541 studies identified, 6 met all inclusion criteria in answering the research question. Since many methodological differences were found in estimating exposure to inhalational anesthetics, a qualitative systematic review was performed. The selected studies have a retrospective cohort design and mostly present a low level of evidence and a low grade of recommendation. Studies with the highest level of evidence do not find an association between the use of inhalational anesthetics and the occurrence of miscarriage or congenital malformations. (4) Conclusions: The administration of inhalational anesthetics, especially with gas extraction systems (scavenging systems) and the adequate ventilation of operating rooms, is not associated with the occurrence of spontaneous abortions or congenital malformations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10048231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100482312023-03-29 Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review García-Álvarez, José Manuel Escribano-Sánchez, Guillermo Osuna, Eduardo Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso Díaz-Agea, José Luis García-Sánchez, Alfonso Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review (1) Background: In the current healthcare environment, there is a large proportion of female staff of childbearing age, so, according to existing conflicting studies, the teratogenic effects that inhalational anesthetics may have on exposed pregnant workers should be assessed. This investigation aims to analyze the teratogenic effects of inhalational anesthetics in conditions of actual use, determining any association with spontaneous abortion or congenital malformations. (2) Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement based on PICO (problem of interest–intervention to be considered–intervention compared–outcome) (Do inhalational anesthetics have teratogenic effects in current clinical practice?). The level of evidence of the selected articles was evaluated using the SIGN scale. The databases used were PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google academic and Opengrey. Primary studies conducted in professionals exposed to inhalational anesthetics that evaluate spontaneous abortions or congenital malformations, conducted in any country and language and published within the last ten years were selected. (3) Results: Of the 541 studies identified, 6 met all inclusion criteria in answering the research question. Since many methodological differences were found in estimating exposure to inhalational anesthetics, a qualitative systematic review was performed. The selected studies have a retrospective cohort design and mostly present a low level of evidence and a low grade of recommendation. Studies with the highest level of evidence do not find an association between the use of inhalational anesthetics and the occurrence of miscarriage or congenital malformations. (4) Conclusions: The administration of inhalational anesthetics, especially with gas extraction systems (scavenging systems) and the adequate ventilation of operating rooms, is not associated with the occurrence of spontaneous abortions or congenital malformations. MDPI 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10048231/ /pubmed/36981540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060883 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
García-Álvarez, José Manuel
Escribano-Sánchez, Guillermo
Osuna, Eduardo
Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso
Díaz-Agea, José Luis
García-Sánchez, Alfonso
Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review
title Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review
title_full Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review
title_short Occupational Exposure to Inhalational Anesthetics and Teratogenic Effects: A Systematic Review
title_sort occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics and teratogenic effects: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060883
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaalvarezjosemanuel occupationalexposuretoinhalationalanestheticsandteratogeniceffectsasystematicreview
AT escribanosanchezguillermo occupationalexposuretoinhalationalanestheticsandteratogeniceffectsasystematicreview
AT osunaeduardo occupationalexposuretoinhalationalanestheticsandteratogeniceffectsasystematicreview
AT molinarodriguezalonso occupationalexposuretoinhalationalanestheticsandteratogeniceffectsasystematicreview
AT diazageajoseluis occupationalexposuretoinhalationalanestheticsandteratogeniceffectsasystematicreview
AT garciasanchezalfonso occupationalexposuretoinhalationalanestheticsandteratogeniceffectsasystematicreview