Cargando…

Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes

The ability to associate a contributor with a specific body fluid in a crime stain can aid casework investigation. The detection of body fluids combined with DNA analyses may supply essential information, but as the two tests are independent, they may not be associated. Recently, the analysis of cod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johannessen, Helen, Hanson, Erin, Gill, Peter, Haas, Cordula, Bergseth, Erik Francisco, Ballantyne, Jack, Fonneløp, Ane Elida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14030636
_version_ 1785014223161524224
author Johannessen, Helen
Hanson, Erin
Gill, Peter
Haas, Cordula
Bergseth, Erik Francisco
Ballantyne, Jack
Fonneløp, Ane Elida
author_facet Johannessen, Helen
Hanson, Erin
Gill, Peter
Haas, Cordula
Bergseth, Erik Francisco
Ballantyne, Jack
Fonneløp, Ane Elida
author_sort Johannessen, Helen
collection PubMed
description The ability to associate a contributor with a specific body fluid in a crime stain can aid casework investigation. The detection of body fluids combined with DNA analyses may supply essential information, but as the two tests are independent, they may not be associated. Recently, the analysis of coding region SNPs (cSNPs) within the RNA transcript has been proven to be a promising method to face this challenge. In this study, we performed targeted RNA sequencing of 158 samples (boxershorts, fingernail swabs and penile swabs) collected from 12 couples at different time points post-intimate contact and after non-intimate contact, using the Ion S5™ System and BFID-cSNP-6F assay. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of the MPS and CE methods in the detection of mRNA markers, and to associate body fluids with contributors by their cSNP genotypes. The results of the study show a lower success rate in the detection of vaginal mucosa by the MPS compared to the CE method. However, the additional information obtained with the cSNP genotypes could successfully associate body fluids with contributors in most cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10048544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100485442023-03-29 Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes Johannessen, Helen Hanson, Erin Gill, Peter Haas, Cordula Bergseth, Erik Francisco Ballantyne, Jack Fonneløp, Ane Elida Genes (Basel) Article The ability to associate a contributor with a specific body fluid in a crime stain can aid casework investigation. The detection of body fluids combined with DNA analyses may supply essential information, but as the two tests are independent, they may not be associated. Recently, the analysis of coding region SNPs (cSNPs) within the RNA transcript has been proven to be a promising method to face this challenge. In this study, we performed targeted RNA sequencing of 158 samples (boxershorts, fingernail swabs and penile swabs) collected from 12 couples at different time points post-intimate contact and after non-intimate contact, using the Ion S5™ System and BFID-cSNP-6F assay. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of the MPS and CE methods in the detection of mRNA markers, and to associate body fluids with contributors by their cSNP genotypes. The results of the study show a lower success rate in the detection of vaginal mucosa by the MPS compared to the CE method. However, the additional information obtained with the cSNP genotypes could successfully associate body fluids with contributors in most cases. MDPI 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10048544/ /pubmed/36980908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14030636 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Johannessen, Helen
Hanson, Erin
Gill, Peter
Haas, Cordula
Bergseth, Erik Francisco
Ballantyne, Jack
Fonneløp, Ane Elida
Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
title Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
title_full Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
title_fullStr Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
title_short Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
title_sort body fluid identification in samples collected after intimate and social contact: a comparison of two mrna profiling methods and the additional information gained by csnp genotypes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14030636
work_keys_str_mv AT johannessenhelen bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes
AT hansonerin bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes
AT gillpeter bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes
AT haascordula bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes
AT bergsetherikfrancisco bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes
AT ballantynejack bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes
AT fonneløpaneelida bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes