Cargando…
Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes
The ability to associate a contributor with a specific body fluid in a crime stain can aid casework investigation. The detection of body fluids combined with DNA analyses may supply essential information, but as the two tests are independent, they may not be associated. Recently, the analysis of cod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14030636 |
_version_ | 1785014223161524224 |
---|---|
author | Johannessen, Helen Hanson, Erin Gill, Peter Haas, Cordula Bergseth, Erik Francisco Ballantyne, Jack Fonneløp, Ane Elida |
author_facet | Johannessen, Helen Hanson, Erin Gill, Peter Haas, Cordula Bergseth, Erik Francisco Ballantyne, Jack Fonneløp, Ane Elida |
author_sort | Johannessen, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to associate a contributor with a specific body fluid in a crime stain can aid casework investigation. The detection of body fluids combined with DNA analyses may supply essential information, but as the two tests are independent, they may not be associated. Recently, the analysis of coding region SNPs (cSNPs) within the RNA transcript has been proven to be a promising method to face this challenge. In this study, we performed targeted RNA sequencing of 158 samples (boxershorts, fingernail swabs and penile swabs) collected from 12 couples at different time points post-intimate contact and after non-intimate contact, using the Ion S5™ System and BFID-cSNP-6F assay. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of the MPS and CE methods in the detection of mRNA markers, and to associate body fluids with contributors by their cSNP genotypes. The results of the study show a lower success rate in the detection of vaginal mucosa by the MPS compared to the CE method. However, the additional information obtained with the cSNP genotypes could successfully associate body fluids with contributors in most cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10048544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100485442023-03-29 Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes Johannessen, Helen Hanson, Erin Gill, Peter Haas, Cordula Bergseth, Erik Francisco Ballantyne, Jack Fonneløp, Ane Elida Genes (Basel) Article The ability to associate a contributor with a specific body fluid in a crime stain can aid casework investigation. The detection of body fluids combined with DNA analyses may supply essential information, but as the two tests are independent, they may not be associated. Recently, the analysis of coding region SNPs (cSNPs) within the RNA transcript has been proven to be a promising method to face this challenge. In this study, we performed targeted RNA sequencing of 158 samples (boxershorts, fingernail swabs and penile swabs) collected from 12 couples at different time points post-intimate contact and after non-intimate contact, using the Ion S5™ System and BFID-cSNP-6F assay. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of the MPS and CE methods in the detection of mRNA markers, and to associate body fluids with contributors by their cSNP genotypes. The results of the study show a lower success rate in the detection of vaginal mucosa by the MPS compared to the CE method. However, the additional information obtained with the cSNP genotypes could successfully associate body fluids with contributors in most cases. MDPI 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10048544/ /pubmed/36980908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14030636 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Johannessen, Helen Hanson, Erin Gill, Peter Haas, Cordula Bergseth, Erik Francisco Ballantyne, Jack Fonneløp, Ane Elida Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes |
title | Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes |
title_full | Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes |
title_fullStr | Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes |
title_short | Body Fluid Identification in Samples Collected after Intimate and Social Contact: A Comparison of Two mRNA Profiling Methods and the Additional Information Gained by cSNP Genotypes |
title_sort | body fluid identification in samples collected after intimate and social contact: a comparison of two mrna profiling methods and the additional information gained by csnp genotypes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14030636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johannessenhelen bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes AT hansonerin bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes AT gillpeter bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes AT haascordula bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes AT bergsetherikfrancisco bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes AT ballantynejack bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes AT fonneløpaneelida bodyfluididentificationinsamplescollectedafterintimateandsocialcontactacomparisonoftwomrnaprofilingmethodsandtheadditionalinformationgainedbycsnpgenotypes |