Cargando…
Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
Background: The effect of load distribution applied to the trunk musculature with lunge exercises has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of load placement using dumbbells on the activation of the latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060916 |
_version_ | 1785014252667404288 |
---|---|
author | López-de-Celis, Carlos Labata-Lezaun, Noé Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi Garcia-Ribell, Erik Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert |
author_facet | López-de-Celis, Carlos Labata-Lezaun, Noé Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi Garcia-Ribell, Erik Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert |
author_sort | López-de-Celis, Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The effect of load distribution applied to the trunk musculature with lunge exercises has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of load placement using dumbbells on the activation of the latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles during the lunge. Methods: Forty-two amateur athletes (21 men and 21 women) were recruited. Three lunge exercises were performed with different loading arrangements (ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral). The principal variable recorded for muscle activity was mean “root mean square” expressed as the percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Results: There are statistically significant differences in the erector spinae (p < 0.001; p < 0.003) and external oblique muscles (p < 0.009; p < 0.001) compared with the contralateral side. The muscle on the opposite side of the load achieved higher activation for these muscles. The erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscle did not reach a statistically significant difference with the contralateral side in any exercise (p > 0.05). The higher activation of the latissimus dorsi occurred on the same side on which the load was placed. Conclusions: There was higher activation of the erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles contralateral to the side of load placement during lunge exercise by amateur athletes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10048665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100486652023-03-29 Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study López-de-Celis, Carlos Labata-Lezaun, Noé Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi Garcia-Ribell, Erik Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: The effect of load distribution applied to the trunk musculature with lunge exercises has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of load placement using dumbbells on the activation of the latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles during the lunge. Methods: Forty-two amateur athletes (21 men and 21 women) were recruited. Three lunge exercises were performed with different loading arrangements (ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral). The principal variable recorded for muscle activity was mean “root mean square” expressed as the percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Results: There are statistically significant differences in the erector spinae (p < 0.001; p < 0.003) and external oblique muscles (p < 0.009; p < 0.001) compared with the contralateral side. The muscle on the opposite side of the load achieved higher activation for these muscles. The erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscle did not reach a statistically significant difference with the contralateral side in any exercise (p > 0.05). The higher activation of the latissimus dorsi occurred on the same side on which the load was placed. Conclusions: There was higher activation of the erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles contralateral to the side of load placement during lunge exercise by amateur athletes. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10048665/ /pubmed/36981573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060916 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article López-de-Celis, Carlos Labata-Lezaun, Noé Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi Garcia-Ribell, Erik Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | effect of load distribution on trunk muscle activity with lunge exercises in amateur athletes: cross-sectional study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060916 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezdeceliscarlos effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy AT labatalezaunnoe effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy AT romanisanchezsergi effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy AT gassovillarejosergi effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy AT garciaribellerik effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy AT rodriguezsanzjacobo effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy AT perezbellmuntalbert effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy |