Cargando…

Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The effect of load distribution applied to the trunk musculature with lunge exercises has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of load placement using dumbbells on the activation of the latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-de-Celis, Carlos, Labata-Lezaun, Noé, Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi, Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi, Garcia-Ribell, Erik, Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo, Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060916
_version_ 1785014252667404288
author López-de-Celis, Carlos
Labata-Lezaun, Noé
Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi
Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi
Garcia-Ribell, Erik
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
author_facet López-de-Celis, Carlos
Labata-Lezaun, Noé
Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi
Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi
Garcia-Ribell, Erik
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
author_sort López-de-Celis, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Background: The effect of load distribution applied to the trunk musculature with lunge exercises has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of load placement using dumbbells on the activation of the latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles during the lunge. Methods: Forty-two amateur athletes (21 men and 21 women) were recruited. Three lunge exercises were performed with different loading arrangements (ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral). The principal variable recorded for muscle activity was mean “root mean square” expressed as the percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Results: There are statistically significant differences in the erector spinae (p < 0.001; p < 0.003) and external oblique muscles (p < 0.009; p < 0.001) compared with the contralateral side. The muscle on the opposite side of the load achieved higher activation for these muscles. The erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscle did not reach a statistically significant difference with the contralateral side in any exercise (p > 0.05). The higher activation of the latissimus dorsi occurred on the same side on which the load was placed. Conclusions: There was higher activation of the erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles contralateral to the side of load placement during lunge exercise by amateur athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10048665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100486652023-03-29 Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study López-de-Celis, Carlos Labata-Lezaun, Noé Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi Garcia-Ribell, Erik Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: The effect of load distribution applied to the trunk musculature with lunge exercises has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of load placement using dumbbells on the activation of the latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles during the lunge. Methods: Forty-two amateur athletes (21 men and 21 women) were recruited. Three lunge exercises were performed with different loading arrangements (ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral). The principal variable recorded for muscle activity was mean “root mean square” expressed as the percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Results: There are statistically significant differences in the erector spinae (p < 0.001; p < 0.003) and external oblique muscles (p < 0.009; p < 0.001) compared with the contralateral side. The muscle on the opposite side of the load achieved higher activation for these muscles. The erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscle did not reach a statistically significant difference with the contralateral side in any exercise (p > 0.05). The higher activation of the latissimus dorsi occurred on the same side on which the load was placed. Conclusions: There was higher activation of the erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles contralateral to the side of load placement during lunge exercise by amateur athletes. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10048665/ /pubmed/36981573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060916 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Labata-Lezaun, Noé
Romaní-Sánchez, Sergi
Gassó-Villarejo, Sergi
Garcia-Ribell, Erik
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
title Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Effect of Load Distribution on Trunk Muscle Activity with Lunge Exercises in Amateur Athletes: Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort effect of load distribution on trunk muscle activity with lunge exercises in amateur athletes: cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060916
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezdeceliscarlos effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy
AT labatalezaunnoe effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy
AT romanisanchezsergi effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy
AT gassovillarejosergi effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy
AT garciaribellerik effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy
AT rodriguezsanzjacobo effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy
AT perezbellmuntalbert effectofloaddistributionontrunkmuscleactivitywithlungeexercisesinamateurathletescrosssectionalstudy