Cargando…

Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review

Objective: To understand the methodological approaches taken by various research groups and determine the kinematic variables that could consistently and reliably differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Complete via EBSCO, EBSCOhost, SPORTDi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, Courtney Jade, Cronin, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982135
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065227
_version_ 1785014282870587392
author Mitchell, Courtney Jade
Cronin, John
author_facet Mitchell, Courtney Jade
Cronin, John
author_sort Mitchell, Courtney Jade
collection PubMed
description Objective: To understand the methodological approaches taken by various research groups and determine the kinematic variables that could consistently and reliably differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Complete via EBSCO, EBSCOhost, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were searched from inception until 31 December 2021, using key terms related to concussion, mild traumatic brain injury, gait, cognition and dual task. Studies that reported spatiotemporal kinematic outcomes were included. Data were extracted using a customised spreadsheet, including detailed information on participant characteristics, assessment protocols, equipment used, and outcomes. Results: Twenty-three studies involving 1030 participants met the inclusion criteria. Ten outcome measures were reported across these articles. Some metrics such as gait velocity and stride length may be promising but are limited by the status of the current research; the majority of the reported variables were not sensitive enough across technologies to consistently differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Understanding variable sensitivity was made more difficult given the absence of any reporting of reliability of the protocols and variables in the respective studies. Conclusion: Given the current status of the literature and the methodologies reviewed, there would seem little consensus on which gait parameters are best to determine return to play readiness after concussion. There is potential in this area for such technologies and protocols to be utilised as a tool for identifying and monitoring concussion; however, improving understanding of the variability and validity of technologies and protocols underpins the suggested directions of future research. Inertial measurement units appear to be the most promising technology in this aspect and should guide the focus of future research. Impact: Results of this study may have an impact on what technology is chosen and may be utilised to assist with concussion diagnosis and return to play protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10048786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100487862023-03-29 Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review Mitchell, Courtney Jade Cronin, John Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Objective: To understand the methodological approaches taken by various research groups and determine the kinematic variables that could consistently and reliably differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Complete via EBSCO, EBSCOhost, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were searched from inception until 31 December 2021, using key terms related to concussion, mild traumatic brain injury, gait, cognition and dual task. Studies that reported spatiotemporal kinematic outcomes were included. Data were extracted using a customised spreadsheet, including detailed information on participant characteristics, assessment protocols, equipment used, and outcomes. Results: Twenty-three studies involving 1030 participants met the inclusion criteria. Ten outcome measures were reported across these articles. Some metrics such as gait velocity and stride length may be promising but are limited by the status of the current research; the majority of the reported variables were not sensitive enough across technologies to consistently differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Understanding variable sensitivity was made more difficult given the absence of any reporting of reliability of the protocols and variables in the respective studies. Conclusion: Given the current status of the literature and the methodologies reviewed, there would seem little consensus on which gait parameters are best to determine return to play readiness after concussion. There is potential in this area for such technologies and protocols to be utilised as a tool for identifying and monitoring concussion; however, improving understanding of the variability and validity of technologies and protocols underpins the suggested directions of future research. Inertial measurement units appear to be the most promising technology in this aspect and should guide the focus of future research. Impact: Results of this study may have an impact on what technology is chosen and may be utilised to assist with concussion diagnosis and return to play protocols. MDPI 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10048786/ /pubmed/36982135 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065227 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mitchell, Courtney Jade
Cronin, John
Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review
title Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review
title_full Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review
title_short Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review
title_sort methodological critique of concussive and non-concussive dual task walking assessments: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10048786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982135
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065227
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellcourtneyjade methodologicalcritiqueofconcussiveandnonconcussivedualtaskwalkingassessmentsascopingreview
AT croninjohn methodologicalcritiqueofconcussiveandnonconcussivedualtaskwalkingassessmentsascopingreview