Cargando…
Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer (PC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most frequent in men. Several risk factors can contribute to the development of PC, and those include age, family history, and specific genetic mutations. So far, drug testing in PC, as well as in cancer rese...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065293 |
_version_ | 1785014380110282752 |
---|---|
author | Petrić, Tina Sabol, Maja |
author_facet | Petrić, Tina Sabol, Maja |
author_sort | Petrić, Tina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer (PC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most frequent in men. Several risk factors can contribute to the development of PC, and those include age, family history, and specific genetic mutations. So far, drug testing in PC, as well as in cancer research in general, has been performed on 2D cell cultures. This is mainly because of the vast benefits these models provide, including simplicity and cost effectiveness. However, it is now known that these models are exposed to much higher stiffness; lose physiological extracellular matrix on artificial plastic surfaces; and show changes in differentiation, polarization, and cell–cell communication. This leads to the loss of crucial cellular signaling pathways and changes in cell responses to stimuli when compared to in vivo conditions. Here, we emphasize the importance of a diverse collection of 3D PC models and their benefits over 2D models in drug discovery and screening from the studies done so far, outlining their benefits and limitations. We highlight the differences between the diverse types of 3D models, with the focus on tumor–stroma interactions, cell populations, and extracellular matrix composition, and we summarize various standard and novel therapies tested on 3D models of PC for the purpose of raising awareness of the possibilities for a personalized approach in PC therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10049142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100491422023-03-29 Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer Petrić, Tina Sabol, Maja Int J Mol Sci Review Prostate cancer (PC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most frequent in men. Several risk factors can contribute to the development of PC, and those include age, family history, and specific genetic mutations. So far, drug testing in PC, as well as in cancer research in general, has been performed on 2D cell cultures. This is mainly because of the vast benefits these models provide, including simplicity and cost effectiveness. However, it is now known that these models are exposed to much higher stiffness; lose physiological extracellular matrix on artificial plastic surfaces; and show changes in differentiation, polarization, and cell–cell communication. This leads to the loss of crucial cellular signaling pathways and changes in cell responses to stimuli when compared to in vivo conditions. Here, we emphasize the importance of a diverse collection of 3D PC models and their benefits over 2D models in drug discovery and screening from the studies done so far, outlining their benefits and limitations. We highlight the differences between the diverse types of 3D models, with the focus on tumor–stroma interactions, cell populations, and extracellular matrix composition, and we summarize various standard and novel therapies tested on 3D models of PC for the purpose of raising awareness of the possibilities for a personalized approach in PC therapy. MDPI 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10049142/ /pubmed/36982368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065293 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Petrić, Tina Sabol, Maja Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer |
title | Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Let’s Go 3D! New Generation of Models for Evaluating Drug Response and Resistance in Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | let’s go 3d! new generation of models for evaluating drug response and resistance in prostate cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrictina letsgo3dnewgenerationofmodelsforevaluatingdrugresponseandresistanceinprostatecancer AT sabolmaja letsgo3dnewgenerationofmodelsforevaluatingdrugresponseandresistanceinprostatecancer |