Cargando…
Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models
We review the key steps leading to an improved analysis of thermal protein unfolding. Thermal unfolding is a dynamic cooperative process with many short-lived intermediates. Protein unfolding has been measured by various spectroscopic techniques that reveal structural changes, and by differential sc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065457 |
_version_ | 1785014476491194368 |
---|---|
author | Seelig, Joachim Seelig, Anna |
author_facet | Seelig, Joachim Seelig, Anna |
author_sort | Seelig, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | We review the key steps leading to an improved analysis of thermal protein unfolding. Thermal unfolding is a dynamic cooperative process with many short-lived intermediates. Protein unfolding has been measured by various spectroscopic techniques that reveal structural changes, and by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) that provides the heat capacity change C(p)(T). The corresponding temperature profiles of enthalpy ΔH(T), entropy ΔS(T), and free energy ΔG(T) have thus far been evaluated using a chemical equilibrium two-state model. Taking a different approach, we demonstrated that the temperature profiles of enthalpy ΔH(T), entropy ΔS(T), and free energy ΔG(T) can be obtained directly by a numerical integration of the heat capacity profile C(p)(T). DSC thus offers the unique possibility to assess these parameters without resorting to a model. These experimental parameters now allow us to examine the predictions of different unfolding models. The standard two-state model fits the experimental heat capacity peak quite well. However, neither the enthalpy nor entropy profiles (predicted to be almost linear) are congruent with the measured sigmoidal temperature profiles, nor is the parabolic free energy profile congruent with the experimentally observed trapezoidal temperature profile. We introduce three new models, an empirical two-state model, a statistical–mechanical two-state model and a cooperative statistical-mechanical multistate model. The empirical model partially corrects for the deficits of the standard model. However, only the two statistical–mechanical models are thermodynamically consistent. The two-state models yield good fits for the enthalpy, entropy and free energy of unfolding of small proteins. The cooperative statistical–mechanical multistate model yields perfect fits, even for the unfolding of large proteins such as antibodies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10049513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100495132023-03-29 Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models Seelig, Joachim Seelig, Anna Int J Mol Sci Article We review the key steps leading to an improved analysis of thermal protein unfolding. Thermal unfolding is a dynamic cooperative process with many short-lived intermediates. Protein unfolding has been measured by various spectroscopic techniques that reveal structural changes, and by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) that provides the heat capacity change C(p)(T). The corresponding temperature profiles of enthalpy ΔH(T), entropy ΔS(T), and free energy ΔG(T) have thus far been evaluated using a chemical equilibrium two-state model. Taking a different approach, we demonstrated that the temperature profiles of enthalpy ΔH(T), entropy ΔS(T), and free energy ΔG(T) can be obtained directly by a numerical integration of the heat capacity profile C(p)(T). DSC thus offers the unique possibility to assess these parameters without resorting to a model. These experimental parameters now allow us to examine the predictions of different unfolding models. The standard two-state model fits the experimental heat capacity peak quite well. However, neither the enthalpy nor entropy profiles (predicted to be almost linear) are congruent with the measured sigmoidal temperature profiles, nor is the parabolic free energy profile congruent with the experimentally observed trapezoidal temperature profile. We introduce three new models, an empirical two-state model, a statistical–mechanical two-state model and a cooperative statistical-mechanical multistate model. The empirical model partially corrects for the deficits of the standard model. However, only the two statistical–mechanical models are thermodynamically consistent. The two-state models yield good fits for the enthalpy, entropy and free energy of unfolding of small proteins. The cooperative statistical–mechanical multistate model yields perfect fits, even for the unfolding of large proteins such as antibodies. MDPI 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10049513/ /pubmed/36982534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065457 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Seelig, Joachim Seelig, Anna Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models |
title | Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models |
title_full | Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models |
title_fullStr | Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models |
title_short | Protein Unfolding—Thermodynamic Perspectives and Unfolding Models |
title_sort | protein unfolding—thermodynamic perspectives and unfolding models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seeligjoachim proteinunfoldingthermodynamicperspectivesandunfoldingmodels AT seeliganna proteinunfoldingthermodynamicperspectivesandunfoldingmodels |