Cargando…

Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis

Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liew, Hans, Mein, Stewart, Tessonnier, Thomas, Abdollahi, Amir, Debus, Jürgen, Dokic, Ivana, Mairani, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065118
_version_ 1785014486495657984
author Liew, Hans
Mein, Stewart
Tessonnier, Thomas
Abdollahi, Amir
Debus, Jürgen
Dokic, Ivana
Mairani, Andrea
author_facet Liew, Hans
Mein, Stewart
Tessonnier, Thomas
Abdollahi, Amir
Debus, Jürgen
Dokic, Ivana
Mairani, Andrea
author_sort Liew, Hans
collection PubMed
description Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a model-based analysis, we investigate the meaningfulness of these indications for the clinical treatment outcome. The predictions of a previously benchmarked model of uHDR sparing in the “UNIfied and VERSatile bio response Engine” (UNIVERSE) are combined with existing models of tumor volume kinetics as well as tumor control probability (TCP) and compared to experimental data. The potential TCP of FLASH radiotherapy is investigated by varying the assumed dose-rate, fractionation schemes and oxygen concentration in the target. The developed framework describes the reported tumor growth kinetics appropriately, indicating that sparing effects could be present in the tumor but might be too small to be detected with the number of animals used. The TCP predictions show the possibility of substantial loss of treatment efficacy for FLASH radiotherapy depending on several variables, including the fractionation scheme, oxygen level, and DNA repair kinetics. The possible loss of TCP should be seriously considered when assessing the clinical viability of FLASH treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10049554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100495542023-03-29 Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis Liew, Hans Mein, Stewart Tessonnier, Thomas Abdollahi, Amir Debus, Jürgen Dokic, Ivana Mairani, Andrea Int J Mol Sci Article Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a model-based analysis, we investigate the meaningfulness of these indications for the clinical treatment outcome. The predictions of a previously benchmarked model of uHDR sparing in the “UNIfied and VERSatile bio response Engine” (UNIVERSE) are combined with existing models of tumor volume kinetics as well as tumor control probability (TCP) and compared to experimental data. The potential TCP of FLASH radiotherapy is investigated by varying the assumed dose-rate, fractionation schemes and oxygen concentration in the target. The developed framework describes the reported tumor growth kinetics appropriately, indicating that sparing effects could be present in the tumor but might be too small to be detected with the number of animals used. The TCP predictions show the possibility of substantial loss of treatment efficacy for FLASH radiotherapy depending on several variables, including the fractionation scheme, oxygen level, and DNA repair kinetics. The possible loss of TCP should be seriously considered when assessing the clinical viability of FLASH treatments. MDPI 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10049554/ /pubmed/36982185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065118 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liew, Hans
Mein, Stewart
Tessonnier, Thomas
Abdollahi, Amir
Debus, Jürgen
Dokic, Ivana
Mairani, Andrea
Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
title Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
title_full Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
title_fullStr Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
title_short Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
title_sort do we preserve tumor control probability (tcp) in flash radiotherapy? a model-based analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065118
work_keys_str_mv AT liewhans dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis
AT meinstewart dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis
AT tessonnierthomas dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis
AT abdollahiamir dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis
AT debusjurgen dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis
AT dokicivana dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis
AT mairaniandrea dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis