Cargando…
Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis
Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065118 |
_version_ | 1785014486495657984 |
---|---|
author | Liew, Hans Mein, Stewart Tessonnier, Thomas Abdollahi, Amir Debus, Jürgen Dokic, Ivana Mairani, Andrea |
author_facet | Liew, Hans Mein, Stewart Tessonnier, Thomas Abdollahi, Amir Debus, Jürgen Dokic, Ivana Mairani, Andrea |
author_sort | Liew, Hans |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a model-based analysis, we investigate the meaningfulness of these indications for the clinical treatment outcome. The predictions of a previously benchmarked model of uHDR sparing in the “UNIfied and VERSatile bio response Engine” (UNIVERSE) are combined with existing models of tumor volume kinetics as well as tumor control probability (TCP) and compared to experimental data. The potential TCP of FLASH radiotherapy is investigated by varying the assumed dose-rate, fractionation schemes and oxygen concentration in the target. The developed framework describes the reported tumor growth kinetics appropriately, indicating that sparing effects could be present in the tumor but might be too small to be detected with the number of animals used. The TCP predictions show the possibility of substantial loss of treatment efficacy for FLASH radiotherapy depending on several variables, including the fractionation scheme, oxygen level, and DNA repair kinetics. The possible loss of TCP should be seriously considered when assessing the clinical viability of FLASH treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10049554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100495542023-03-29 Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis Liew, Hans Mein, Stewart Tessonnier, Thomas Abdollahi, Amir Debus, Jürgen Dokic, Ivana Mairani, Andrea Int J Mol Sci Article Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a model-based analysis, we investigate the meaningfulness of these indications for the clinical treatment outcome. The predictions of a previously benchmarked model of uHDR sparing in the “UNIfied and VERSatile bio response Engine” (UNIVERSE) are combined with existing models of tumor volume kinetics as well as tumor control probability (TCP) and compared to experimental data. The potential TCP of FLASH radiotherapy is investigated by varying the assumed dose-rate, fractionation schemes and oxygen concentration in the target. The developed framework describes the reported tumor growth kinetics appropriately, indicating that sparing effects could be present in the tumor but might be too small to be detected with the number of animals used. The TCP predictions show the possibility of substantial loss of treatment efficacy for FLASH radiotherapy depending on several variables, including the fractionation scheme, oxygen level, and DNA repair kinetics. The possible loss of TCP should be seriously considered when assessing the clinical viability of FLASH treatments. MDPI 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10049554/ /pubmed/36982185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065118 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Liew, Hans Mein, Stewart Tessonnier, Thomas Abdollahi, Amir Debus, Jürgen Dokic, Ivana Mairani, Andrea Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis |
title | Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis |
title_full | Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis |
title_fullStr | Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis |
title_short | Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis |
title_sort | do we preserve tumor control probability (tcp) in flash radiotherapy? a model-based analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36982185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liewhans dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis AT meinstewart dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis AT tessonnierthomas dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis AT abdollahiamir dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis AT debusjurgen dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis AT dokicivana dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis AT mairaniandrea dowepreservetumorcontrolprobabilitytcpinflashradiotherapyamodelbasedanalysis |