Cargando…

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Chitosan Hydrogel Paste in Comparison to Commercial Hydroactive Gel as a Wound Bed Preparation

Background  This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of chitosan derivative hydrogel paste (CDHP) as a wound bed preparation for wounds with cavities. Methods  This study enrolled 287 patients, with 143 patients randomized into the CDHP group (treatment) and 144 patients randomize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasir, Nur Azida Mohd, Saad, Arman Zaharil Mat, Bachok, Nor Sa'adah, Rashid, Ahmad Hazri Ab, Ujang, Zanariah, Noorsal, Kartini, Yusof, Norimah, Hashim, Kamaruddin, Nor, Fatimah Mohd, Imran, Farrah-Hani, Yusof, Nazri Mohd, Sharifudin, Mohd Ariff, Halim, Ahmad Sukari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759503
Descripción
Sumario:Background  This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of chitosan derivative hydrogel paste (CDHP) as a wound bed preparation for wounds with cavities. Methods  This study enrolled 287 patients, with 143 patients randomized into the CDHP group (treatment) and 144 patients randomized into the commercial hydroactive gel (CHG) group (control). The granulation tissue, necrotic tissue, patient comfort, clinical signs, symptoms, and patient convenience during the application and removal of the dressing were assessed. Results  The study was completed by 111 and 105 patients from the treatment and control groups, respectively. Both groups showed an increasing mean percentage of wound granulation over time when the initial wound size and comorbidity were adjusted (F(10,198) = 4.61; p  < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between the groups (F(1,207) = 0.043; p  = 0.953). The adjusted mean percentage of necrotic tissue of both groups showed a significant decrease over time (F(10,235) = 5.65; p <0.001), but no significant differences were found between the groups (F (1,244) = 0.487; p  = 0.486). Conclusion  CDHP is equivalent to CHG and is an alternative in wound management and wound bed preparation for wounds with cavities.