Cargando…
A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study
Background The number of cosmetic and reconstructive surgeries that use breast implants is increasing in Korea. Recently, it has been reported that breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is related to textured breast implants, and interest in classification according to the textur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760405 |
_version_ | 1785014547783876608 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Joo Hyuck Jang, Jae Hyuk Min, Kyung Hee |
author_facet | Lee, Joo Hyuck Jang, Jae Hyuk Min, Kyung Hee |
author_sort | Lee, Joo Hyuck |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The number of cosmetic and reconstructive surgeries that use breast implants is increasing in Korea. Recently, it has been reported that breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is related to textured breast implants, and interest in classification according to the texture of breast implants is increasing. However, there is currently no clear and unified classification. In particular, the definition of “microtextured” is highly varied. In this study, we retrospectively investigated and analyzed the clinical outcomes of smooth and microtextured breast implants. Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent breast augmentation surgery with smooth and microtextured silicone gel implants between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. We retrospectively analyzed implant manufacturer, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, incision location, implant size, follow-up period, complications, and reoperation rate. Results A total of 266 patients underwent breast augmentation surgery, of which 181 used smooth silicone gel implants and 85 used microtextured silicone gel implants. Age, BMI, smoking status, implant size, and follow-up period were not significantly different between the two groups. Similarly, complications and reoperation rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion It is important to provide information regarding the clinical risks and benefits of breast implants to surgeons and patients through a clear and unified classification according to the texture of the breast implant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10049833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100498332023-03-29 A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study Lee, Joo Hyuck Jang, Jae Hyuk Min, Kyung Hee Arch Plast Surg Background The number of cosmetic and reconstructive surgeries that use breast implants is increasing in Korea. Recently, it has been reported that breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is related to textured breast implants, and interest in classification according to the texture of breast implants is increasing. However, there is currently no clear and unified classification. In particular, the definition of “microtextured” is highly varied. In this study, we retrospectively investigated and analyzed the clinical outcomes of smooth and microtextured breast implants. Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent breast augmentation surgery with smooth and microtextured silicone gel implants between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. We retrospectively analyzed implant manufacturer, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, incision location, implant size, follow-up period, complications, and reoperation rate. Results A total of 266 patients underwent breast augmentation surgery, of which 181 used smooth silicone gel implants and 85 used microtextured silicone gel implants. Age, BMI, smoking status, implant size, and follow-up period were not significantly different between the two groups. Similarly, complications and reoperation rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion It is important to provide information regarding the clinical risks and benefits of breast implants to surgeons and patients through a clear and unified classification according to the texture of the breast implant. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10049833/ /pubmed/36999152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760405 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Lee, Joo Hyuck Jang, Jae Hyuk Min, Kyung Hee A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title | A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | comparison of smooth and microtextured breast implants in breast augmentation: a retrospective study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejoohyuck acomparisonofsmoothandmicrotexturedbreastimplantsinbreastaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT jangjaehyuk acomparisonofsmoothandmicrotexturedbreastimplantsinbreastaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT minkyunghee acomparisonofsmoothandmicrotexturedbreastimplantsinbreastaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT leejoohyuck comparisonofsmoothandmicrotexturedbreastimplantsinbreastaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT jangjaehyuk comparisonofsmoothandmicrotexturedbreastimplantsinbreastaugmentationaretrospectivestudy AT minkyunghee comparisonofsmoothandmicrotexturedbreastimplantsinbreastaugmentationaretrospectivestudy |