Cargando…

The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 99...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Quan, Peng, Liang, Rao, Lixin, Ma, Cao, Zhao, Kang, Zhao, Zhenzhou, Tang, Haiyu, Li, Muwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836
_version_ 1785014549918777344
author Guo, Quan
Peng, Liang
Rao, Lixin
Ma, Cao
Zhao, Kang
Zhao, Zhenzhou
Tang, Haiyu
Li, Muwei
author_facet Guo, Quan
Peng, Liang
Rao, Lixin
Ma, Cao
Zhao, Kang
Zhao, Zhenzhou
Tang, Haiyu
Li, Muwei
author_sort Guo, Quan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the “L-sandwich” strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: The “L-sandwich” strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10049845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100498452023-03-29 The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial Guo, Quan Peng, Liang Rao, Lixin Ma, Cao Zhao, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Tang, Haiyu Li, Muwei J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the “L-sandwich” strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: The “L-sandwich” strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy. Hindawi 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10049845/ /pubmed/36998672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836 Text en Copyright © 2023 Quan Guo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guo, Quan
Peng, Liang
Rao, Lixin
Ma, Cao
Zhao, Kang
Zhao, Zhenzhou
Tang, Haiyu
Li, Muwei
The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort “l-sandwich” strategy for true coronary bifurcation lesions: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836
work_keys_str_mv AT guoquan thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pengliang thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raolixin thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT macao thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhaokang thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhaozhenzhou thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tanghaiyu thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT limuwei thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT guoquan lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pengliang lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raolixin lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT macao lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhaokang lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhaozhenzhou lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tanghaiyu lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT limuwei lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial