Cargando…
The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 99...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836 |
_version_ | 1785014549918777344 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Quan Peng, Liang Rao, Lixin Ma, Cao Zhao, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Tang, Haiyu Li, Muwei |
author_facet | Guo, Quan Peng, Liang Rao, Lixin Ma, Cao Zhao, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Tang, Haiyu Li, Muwei |
author_sort | Guo, Quan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the “L-sandwich” strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: The “L-sandwich” strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10049845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100498452023-03-29 The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial Guo, Quan Peng, Liang Rao, Lixin Ma, Cao Zhao, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Tang, Haiyu Li, Muwei J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the “L-sandwich” strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: The “L-sandwich” strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy. Hindawi 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10049845/ /pubmed/36998672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836 Text en Copyright © 2023 Quan Guo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Guo, Quan Peng, Liang Rao, Lixin Ma, Cao Zhao, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Tang, Haiyu Li, Muwei The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | “l-sandwich” strategy for true coronary bifurcation lesions: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoquan thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT pengliang thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT raolixin thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT macao thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhaokang thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhaozhenzhou thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT tanghaiyu thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT limuwei thelsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT guoquan lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT pengliang lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT raolixin lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT macao lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhaokang lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhaozhenzhou lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT tanghaiyu lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT limuwei lsandwichstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionsarandomizedclinicaltrial |