Cargando…

A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors

A combination of wearable sensors’ data and Machine Learning (ML) techniques has been used in many studies to predict specific joint angles and moments. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four different non-linear regression ML models to estimate lower-limb joints’ kinematics, k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moghadam, Shima Mohammadi, Yeung, Ted, Choisne, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31906-z
_version_ 1785014581268054016
author Moghadam, Shima Mohammadi
Yeung, Ted
Choisne, Julie
author_facet Moghadam, Shima Mohammadi
Yeung, Ted
Choisne, Julie
author_sort Moghadam, Shima Mohammadi
collection PubMed
description A combination of wearable sensors’ data and Machine Learning (ML) techniques has been used in many studies to predict specific joint angles and moments. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four different non-linear regression ML models to estimate lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces using Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and electromyographys’ (EMGs) data. Seventeen healthy volunteers (9F, 28 ± 5 years) were asked to walk over-ground for a minimum of 16 trials. For each trial, marker trajectories and three force-plates data were recorded to calculate pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics, and muscle forces (the targets), as well as 7 IMUs and 16 EMGs. The features from sensors’ data were extracted using the Tsfresh python package and fed into 4 ML models; Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline for targets’ prediction. The RF and CNN models outperformed the other ML models by providing lower prediction errors in all intended targets with a lower computational cost. This study suggested that a combination of wearable sensors’ data with an RF or a CNN model is a promising tool to overcome the limitations of traditional optical motion capture for 3D gait analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10049990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100499902023-03-30 A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors Moghadam, Shima Mohammadi Yeung, Ted Choisne, Julie Sci Rep Article A combination of wearable sensors’ data and Machine Learning (ML) techniques has been used in many studies to predict specific joint angles and moments. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four different non-linear regression ML models to estimate lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces using Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and electromyographys’ (EMGs) data. Seventeen healthy volunteers (9F, 28 ± 5 years) were asked to walk over-ground for a minimum of 16 trials. For each trial, marker trajectories and three force-plates data were recorded to calculate pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics, and muscle forces (the targets), as well as 7 IMUs and 16 EMGs. The features from sensors’ data were extracted using the Tsfresh python package and fed into 4 ML models; Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline for targets’ prediction. The RF and CNN models outperformed the other ML models by providing lower prediction errors in all intended targets with a lower computational cost. This study suggested that a combination of wearable sensors’ data with an RF or a CNN model is a promising tool to overcome the limitations of traditional optical motion capture for 3D gait analysis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10049990/ /pubmed/36977706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31906-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Moghadam, Shima Mohammadi
Yeung, Ted
Choisne, Julie
A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
title A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
title_full A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
title_fullStr A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
title_short A comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
title_sort comparison of machine learning models’ accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces from wearable sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31906-z
work_keys_str_mv AT moghadamshimamohammadi acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsaccuracyinpredictinglowerlimbjointskinematicskineticsandmuscleforcesfromwearablesensors
AT yeungted acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsaccuracyinpredictinglowerlimbjointskinematicskineticsandmuscleforcesfromwearablesensors
AT choisnejulie acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsaccuracyinpredictinglowerlimbjointskinematicskineticsandmuscleforcesfromwearablesensors
AT moghadamshimamohammadi comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsaccuracyinpredictinglowerlimbjointskinematicskineticsandmuscleforcesfromwearablesensors
AT yeungted comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsaccuracyinpredictinglowerlimbjointskinematicskineticsandmuscleforcesfromwearablesensors
AT choisnejulie comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsaccuracyinpredictinglowerlimbjointskinematicskineticsandmuscleforcesfromwearablesensors