Cargando…
Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest contribute pre-dominantly to mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Here, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as an established therapeutic option for patients suffering from these life-threatening entities. VA-ECMO provides t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0 |
_version_ | 1785014600514666496 |
---|---|
author | Lüsebrink, Enzo Binzenhöfer, Leonhard Kellnar, Antonia Müller, Christoph Scherer, Clemens Schrage, Benedikt Joskowiak, Dominik Petzold, Tobias Braun, Daniel Brunner, Stefan Peterss, Sven Hausleiter, Jörg Zimmer, Sebastian Born, Frank Westermann, Dirk Thiele, Holger Schäfer, Andreas Hagl, Christian Massberg, Steffen Orban, Martin |
author_facet | Lüsebrink, Enzo Binzenhöfer, Leonhard Kellnar, Antonia Müller, Christoph Scherer, Clemens Schrage, Benedikt Joskowiak, Dominik Petzold, Tobias Braun, Daniel Brunner, Stefan Peterss, Sven Hausleiter, Jörg Zimmer, Sebastian Born, Frank Westermann, Dirk Thiele, Holger Schäfer, Andreas Hagl, Christian Massberg, Steffen Orban, Martin |
author_sort | Lüsebrink, Enzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest contribute pre-dominantly to mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Here, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as an established therapeutic option for patients suffering from these life-threatening entities. VA-ECMO provides temporary circulatory support until causative treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridging strategy to surgical ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation or decision-making. However, in-hospital mortality rate in this treatment population is still around 60%. In the recently published ARREST trial, VA-ECMO treatment lowered mortality rate in patients with ongoing cardiac arrest due to therapy refractory ventricular fibrillation compared to standard advanced cardiac life support in selected patients. Whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality compared to standard of care in cardiogenic shock has to be evaluated in the ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134) and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). As an innate drawback of VA-ECMO treatment, the retrograde aortic flow could lead to an elevation of left ventricular (LV) afterload, increase in LV filling pressure, mitral regurgitation, and elevated left atrial pressure. This may compromise myocardial function and recovery, pulmonary hemodynamics—possibly with concomitant pulmonary congestion and even lung failure—and contribute to poor outcomes in a relevant proportion of treated patients. To overcome these detrimental effects, a multitude of venting strategies are currently engaged for both preventive and emergent unloading. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and structured synopsis of existing venting modalities and their specific hemodynamic characteristics. We discuss in detail the available data on outcome categories and complication rates related to the respective venting option. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10050067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100500672023-03-30 Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Lüsebrink, Enzo Binzenhöfer, Leonhard Kellnar, Antonia Müller, Christoph Scherer, Clemens Schrage, Benedikt Joskowiak, Dominik Petzold, Tobias Braun, Daniel Brunner, Stefan Peterss, Sven Hausleiter, Jörg Zimmer, Sebastian Born, Frank Westermann, Dirk Thiele, Holger Schäfer, Andreas Hagl, Christian Massberg, Steffen Orban, Martin Clin Res Cardiol Review Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest contribute pre-dominantly to mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Here, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as an established therapeutic option for patients suffering from these life-threatening entities. VA-ECMO provides temporary circulatory support until causative treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridging strategy to surgical ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation or decision-making. However, in-hospital mortality rate in this treatment population is still around 60%. In the recently published ARREST trial, VA-ECMO treatment lowered mortality rate in patients with ongoing cardiac arrest due to therapy refractory ventricular fibrillation compared to standard advanced cardiac life support in selected patients. Whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality compared to standard of care in cardiogenic shock has to be evaluated in the ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134) and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). As an innate drawback of VA-ECMO treatment, the retrograde aortic flow could lead to an elevation of left ventricular (LV) afterload, increase in LV filling pressure, mitral regurgitation, and elevated left atrial pressure. This may compromise myocardial function and recovery, pulmonary hemodynamics—possibly with concomitant pulmonary congestion and even lung failure—and contribute to poor outcomes in a relevant proportion of treated patients. To overcome these detrimental effects, a multitude of venting strategies are currently engaged for both preventive and emergent unloading. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and structured synopsis of existing venting modalities and their specific hemodynamic characteristics. We discuss in detail the available data on outcome categories and complication rates related to the respective venting option. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10050067/ /pubmed/35986750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Lüsebrink, Enzo Binzenhöfer, Leonhard Kellnar, Antonia Müller, Christoph Scherer, Clemens Schrage, Benedikt Joskowiak, Dominik Petzold, Tobias Braun, Daniel Brunner, Stefan Peterss, Sven Hausleiter, Jörg Zimmer, Sebastian Born, Frank Westermann, Dirk Thiele, Holger Schäfer, Andreas Hagl, Christian Massberg, Steffen Orban, Martin Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
title | Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
title_full | Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
title_fullStr | Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
title_full_unstemmed | Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
title_short | Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
title_sort | venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lusebrinkenzo ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT binzenhoferleonhard ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT kellnarantonia ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT mullerchristoph ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT schererclemens ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT schragebenedikt ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT joskowiakdominik ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT petzoldtobias ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT braundaniel ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT brunnerstefan ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT petersssven ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT hausleiterjorg ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT zimmersebastian ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT bornfrank ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT westermanndirk ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT thieleholger ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT schaferandreas ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT haglchristian ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT massbergsteffen ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation AT orbanmartin ventingduringvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenation |