Cargando…

MmCMS: mouse models’ consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) primary tumours are molecularly classified into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1–4). Genetically engineered mouse models aim to faithfully mimic the complexity of human cancers and, when appropriately aligned, represent ideal pre-clinical systems to test ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amirkhah, Raheleh, Gilroy, Kathryn, Malla, Sudhir B., Lannagan, Tamsin R. M., Byrne, Ryan M., Fisher, Natalie C., Corry, Shania M., Mohamed, Noha-Ehssan, Naderi-Meshkin, Hojjat, Mills, Megan L., Campbell, Andrew D., Ridgway, Rachel A., Ahmaderaghi, Baharak, Murray, Richard, Llergo, Antoni Berenguer, Sanz-Pamplona, Rebeca, Villanueva, Alberto, Batlle, Eduard, Salazar, Ramon, Lawler, Mark, Sansom, Owen J., Dunne, Philip D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36717674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02157-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) primary tumours are molecularly classified into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1–4). Genetically engineered mouse models aim to faithfully mimic the complexity of human cancers and, when appropriately aligned, represent ideal pre-clinical systems to test new drug treatments. Despite its importance, dual-species classification has been limited by the lack of a reliable approach. Here we utilise, develop and test a set of options for human-to-mouse CMS classifications of CRC tissue. METHODS: Using transcriptional data from established collections of CRC tumours, including human (TCGA cohort; n = 577) and mouse (n = 57 across n = 8 genotypes) tumours with combinations of random forest and nearest template prediction algorithms, alongside gene ontology collections, we comprehensively assess the performance of a suite of new dual-species classifiers. RESULTS: We developed three approaches: MmCMS-A; a gene-level classifier, MmCMS-B; an ontology-level approach and MmCMS-C; a combined pathway system encompassing multiple biological and histological signalling cascades. Although all options could identify tumours associated with stromal-rich CMS4-like biology, MmCMS-A was unable to accurately classify the biology underpinning epithelial-like subtypes (CMS2/3) in mouse tumours. CONCLUSIONS: When applying human-based transcriptional classifiers to mouse tumour data, a pathway-level classifier, rather than an individual gene-level system, is optimal. Our R package enables researchers to select suitable mouse models of human CRC subtype for their experimental testing.