Cargando…

Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well‐studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiam, Nicole T., Cai, Yi, Wai, Katherine C., Polite, Colleen, Kramer, Kurt, Sharon, Jeffrey D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52
_version_ 1785014750755684352
author Jiam, Nicole T.
Cai, Yi
Wai, Katherine C.
Polite, Colleen
Kramer, Kurt
Sharon, Jeffrey D.
author_facet Jiam, Nicole T.
Cai, Yi
Wai, Katherine C.
Polite, Colleen
Kramer, Kurt
Sharon, Jeffrey D.
author_sort Jiam, Nicole T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well‐studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT) in subjects undergoing CI surgery evaluation. STUDY DESIGN SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: We conducted a retrospective review of 64 adult CI candidacy cases between 2017 and 2020 at a tertiary health care center. METHODS: All patients underwent audiometric testing and evaluation by the senior author. Patients with an abnormal catch‐up saccade contralateral to their worse hearing ear during cHIT were referred for formal vestibular testing. Outcomes included clinical and formal vestibular results, operated ear with regard to audiometric and vestibular results, and postoperative vertigo. RESULTS: Among all CI candidates, 44% (n = 28) reported preoperative disequilibrium symptoms. Overall, 62% (n = 40) of the cHITs were normal, 33% (n = 21) were abnormal, and 5% (n = 3) were inconclusive. There was one patient who presented with a false positive cHIT. Among the patients who endorsed disequilibrium, 43% had a positive preoperative cHIT. Fourteen percent of the subjects (n = 9) without disequilibrium had an abnormal cHIT. In this cohort, bilateral vestibular impairment (71%) was more common than unilateral vestibular impairment (29%). In 3% of the cases (n = 2), surgical management was revisited or altered due to cHIT findings. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the CI candidate population. Self‐reported assessments of vestibular function are often not congruent with cHIT results. Clinicians should consider incorporating cHITs as part of the preoperative physical exam to potentially avoid bilateral vestibular dysfunction in a minority of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10050961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100509612023-03-30 Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation? Jiam, Nicole T. Cai, Yi Wai, Katherine C. Polite, Colleen Kramer, Kurt Sharon, Jeffrey D. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Research Papers OBJECTIVE: Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well‐studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT) in subjects undergoing CI surgery evaluation. STUDY DESIGN SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: We conducted a retrospective review of 64 adult CI candidacy cases between 2017 and 2020 at a tertiary health care center. METHODS: All patients underwent audiometric testing and evaluation by the senior author. Patients with an abnormal catch‐up saccade contralateral to their worse hearing ear during cHIT were referred for formal vestibular testing. Outcomes included clinical and formal vestibular results, operated ear with regard to audiometric and vestibular results, and postoperative vertigo. RESULTS: Among all CI candidates, 44% (n = 28) reported preoperative disequilibrium symptoms. Overall, 62% (n = 40) of the cHITs were normal, 33% (n = 21) were abnormal, and 5% (n = 3) were inconclusive. There was one patient who presented with a false positive cHIT. Among the patients who endorsed disequilibrium, 43% had a positive preoperative cHIT. Fourteen percent of the subjects (n = 9) without disequilibrium had an abnormal cHIT. In this cohort, bilateral vestibular impairment (71%) was more common than unilateral vestibular impairment (29%). In 3% of the cases (n = 2), surgical management was revisited or altered due to cHIT findings. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the CI candidate population. Self‐reported assessments of vestibular function are often not congruent with cHIT results. Clinicians should consider incorporating cHITs as part of the preoperative physical exam to potentially avoid bilateral vestibular dysfunction in a minority of patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10050961/ /pubmed/37006747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52 Text en © 2022 The Authors. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Chinese Medical Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Jiam, Nicole T.
Cai, Yi
Wai, Katherine C.
Polite, Colleen
Kramer, Kurt
Sharon, Jeffrey D.
Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_full Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_fullStr Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_full_unstemmed Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_short Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
title_sort is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52
work_keys_str_mv AT jiamnicolet istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT caiyi istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT waikatherinec istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT politecolleen istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT kramerkurt istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation
AT sharonjeffreyd istheclinicalheadimpulsetesthelpfulincochlearimplantationcandidacyevaluation