Cargando…

Welfare of calves

This Scientific Opinion addresses a European Commission request on the welfare of calves as part of the Farm to Fork strategy. EFSA was asked to provide a description of common husbandry systems and related welfare consequences, as well as measures to prevent or mitigate the hazards leading to them....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Canali, Elisabetta, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis, Gortazar Schmidt, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel, Padalino, Barbara, Pasquali, Paolo, Roberts, Helen Clare, Spoolder, Hans, Stahl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Jensen, Margit Bak, Waiblinger, Susanne, Candiani, Denise, Lima, Eliana, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Van der Stede, Yves, Vitali, Marika, Winckler, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009444
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7896
_version_ 1785014753189429248
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Jensen, Margit Bak
Waiblinger, Susanne
Candiani, Denise
Lima, Eliana
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Winckler, Christoph
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Jensen, Margit Bak
Waiblinger, Susanne
Candiani, Denise
Lima, Eliana
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Winckler, Christoph
collection PubMed
description This Scientific Opinion addresses a European Commission request on the welfare of calves as part of the Farm to Fork strategy. EFSA was asked to provide a description of common husbandry systems and related welfare consequences, as well as measures to prevent or mitigate the hazards leading to them. In addition, recommendations on three specific issues were requested: welfare of calves reared for white veal (space, group housing, requirements of iron and fibre); risk of limited cow–calf contact; and animal‐based measures (ABMs) to monitor on‐farm welfare in slaughterhouses. The methodology developed by EFSA to address similar requests was followed. Fifteen highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, with respiratory disorders, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, gastroenteric disorders and group stress being the most frequent across husbandry systems. Recommendations to improve the welfare of calves include increasing space allowance, keeping calves in stable groups from an early age, ensuring good colostrum management and increasing the amounts of milk fed to dairy calves. In addition, calves should be provided with deformable lying surfaces, water via an open surface and long‐cut roughage in racks. Regarding specific recommendations for veal systems, calves should be kept in small groups (2–7 animals) within the first week of life, provided with ~ 20 m(2)/calf and fed on average 1 kg neutral detergent fibre (NDF) per day, preferably using long‐cut hay. Recommendations on cow–calf contact include keeping the calf with the dam for a minimum of 1 day post‐partum. Longer contact should progressively be implemented, but research is needed to guide this implementation in practice. The ABMs body condition, carcass condemnations, abomasal lesions, lung lesions, carcass colour and bursa swelling may be collected in slaughterhouses to monitor on‐farm welfare but should be complemented with behavioural ABMs collected on farm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10050971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100509712023-03-30 Welfare of calves Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortazar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Jensen, Margit Bak Waiblinger, Susanne Candiani, Denise Lima, Eliana Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Vitali, Marika Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion This Scientific Opinion addresses a European Commission request on the welfare of calves as part of the Farm to Fork strategy. EFSA was asked to provide a description of common husbandry systems and related welfare consequences, as well as measures to prevent or mitigate the hazards leading to them. In addition, recommendations on three specific issues were requested: welfare of calves reared for white veal (space, group housing, requirements of iron and fibre); risk of limited cow–calf contact; and animal‐based measures (ABMs) to monitor on‐farm welfare in slaughterhouses. The methodology developed by EFSA to address similar requests was followed. Fifteen highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, with respiratory disorders, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, gastroenteric disorders and group stress being the most frequent across husbandry systems. Recommendations to improve the welfare of calves include increasing space allowance, keeping calves in stable groups from an early age, ensuring good colostrum management and increasing the amounts of milk fed to dairy calves. In addition, calves should be provided with deformable lying surfaces, water via an open surface and long‐cut roughage in racks. Regarding specific recommendations for veal systems, calves should be kept in small groups (2–7 animals) within the first week of life, provided with ~ 20 m(2)/calf and fed on average 1 kg neutral detergent fibre (NDF) per day, preferably using long‐cut hay. Recommendations on cow–calf contact include keeping the calf with the dam for a minimum of 1 day post‐partum. Longer contact should progressively be implemented, but research is needed to guide this implementation in practice. The ABMs body condition, carcass condemnations, abomasal lesions, lung lesions, carcass colour and bursa swelling may be collected in slaughterhouses to monitor on‐farm welfare but should be complemented with behavioural ABMs collected on farm. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10050971/ /pubmed/37009444 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7896 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Jensen, Margit Bak
Waiblinger, Susanne
Candiani, Denise
Lima, Eliana
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Winckler, Christoph
Welfare of calves
title Welfare of calves
title_full Welfare of calves
title_fullStr Welfare of calves
title_full_unstemmed Welfare of calves
title_short Welfare of calves
title_sort welfare of calves
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009444
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7896
work_keys_str_mv AT welfareofcalves
AT nielsensørensaxmose welfareofcalves
AT alvarezjulio welfareofcalves
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph welfareofcalves
AT calistripaolo welfareofcalves
AT canalielisabetta welfareofcalves
AT drewejulianashley welfareofcalves
AT garinbastujibruno welfareofcalves
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis welfareofcalves
AT gortazarschmidtchristian welfareofcalves
AT herskinmette welfareofcalves
AT michelvirginie welfareofcalves
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel welfareofcalves
AT padalinobarbara welfareofcalves
AT pasqualipaolo welfareofcalves
AT robertshelenclare welfareofcalves
AT spoolderhans welfareofcalves
AT stahlkarl welfareofcalves
AT velardeantonio welfareofcalves
AT viltroparvo welfareofcalves
AT jensenmargitbak welfareofcalves
AT waiblingersusanne welfareofcalves
AT candianidenise welfareofcalves
AT limaeliana welfareofcalves
AT mosbachschulzolaf welfareofcalves
AT vanderstedeyves welfareofcalves
AT vitalimarika welfareofcalves
AT wincklerchristoph welfareofcalves