Cargando…

Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to comprehensively review all studies examining clinical outcomes of craniospinal irradiation with proton radiotherapy for medulloblastoma (MB) to determine whether theoretical dosimetric advantages have translated into superior clinical outcomes (including surviva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Sympascho, Phaterpekar, Kiran, Tsang, Derek S., Boldt, Gabriel, Bauman, Glenn S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101189
_version_ 1785014764395560960
author Young, Sympascho
Phaterpekar, Kiran
Tsang, Derek S.
Boldt, Gabriel
Bauman, Glenn S.
author_facet Young, Sympascho
Phaterpekar, Kiran
Tsang, Derek S.
Boldt, Gabriel
Bauman, Glenn S.
author_sort Young, Sympascho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to comprehensively review all studies examining clinical outcomes of craniospinal irradiation with proton radiotherapy for medulloblastoma (MB) to determine whether theoretical dosimetric advantages have translated into superior clinical outcomes (including survival and toxicities) compared with traditional photon-based techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles reporting on clinical outcomes of pediatric and/or adult patients with MB treated with proton radiotherapy were included. Evidence quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa scale and GRADE score. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included, with a total of 2059 patients reported (representing an estimated 630-654 unique patients). None of the studies were randomized, 12 were comparative, 9 were prospective, 3 were mixed, and 22 were retrospective. Average mean/median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 4 weeks to 12.6 years). The majority of studies (n = 19) reported on treatment with passive scatter proton beams exclusively. Average study quality was 6.0 out of 9 (median, 6; standard deviation, 1.6). Nine studies scored ≥8 out of 9 on the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale; an overall “moderate” GRADE score was assigned. Well-designed comparative cohort studies with adequate follow-up demonstrate superior neurocognitive outcomes, lower incidence of hypothyroidism (23% vs 69%), sex hormone deficiency (3% vs 19%), greater heights, and reduced acute toxicities in patients treated with protons compared to photons. Overall survival (up to 10 years), progression-free survival (up to 10 years), brain stem injury, and other endocrine outcomes were similar to those reported for photon radiation. There was insufficient evidence to make conclusions on endpoints of quality of life, ototoxicity, secondary malignancy, alopecia, scoliosis, cavernomas, and cerebral vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-grade evidence supports proton radiotherapy as a preferred treatment for craniospinal irradiation of MB based on equivalent disease control and comparable-to-improved toxicity versus photon beam radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10051027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100510272023-03-30 Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes Young, Sympascho Phaterpekar, Kiran Tsang, Derek S. Boldt, Gabriel Bauman, Glenn S. Adv Radiat Oncol Critical Review PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to comprehensively review all studies examining clinical outcomes of craniospinal irradiation with proton radiotherapy for medulloblastoma (MB) to determine whether theoretical dosimetric advantages have translated into superior clinical outcomes (including survival and toxicities) compared with traditional photon-based techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles reporting on clinical outcomes of pediatric and/or adult patients with MB treated with proton radiotherapy were included. Evidence quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa scale and GRADE score. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included, with a total of 2059 patients reported (representing an estimated 630-654 unique patients). None of the studies were randomized, 12 were comparative, 9 were prospective, 3 were mixed, and 22 were retrospective. Average mean/median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 4 weeks to 12.6 years). The majority of studies (n = 19) reported on treatment with passive scatter proton beams exclusively. Average study quality was 6.0 out of 9 (median, 6; standard deviation, 1.6). Nine studies scored ≥8 out of 9 on the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale; an overall “moderate” GRADE score was assigned. Well-designed comparative cohort studies with adequate follow-up demonstrate superior neurocognitive outcomes, lower incidence of hypothyroidism (23% vs 69%), sex hormone deficiency (3% vs 19%), greater heights, and reduced acute toxicities in patients treated with protons compared to photons. Overall survival (up to 10 years), progression-free survival (up to 10 years), brain stem injury, and other endocrine outcomes were similar to those reported for photon radiation. There was insufficient evidence to make conclusions on endpoints of quality of life, ototoxicity, secondary malignancy, alopecia, scoliosis, cavernomas, and cerebral vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-grade evidence supports proton radiotherapy as a preferred treatment for craniospinal irradiation of MB based on equivalent disease control and comparable-to-improved toxicity versus photon beam radiation therapy. Elsevier 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10051027/ /pubmed/37008255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101189 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Critical Review
Young, Sympascho
Phaterpekar, Kiran
Tsang, Derek S.
Boldt, Gabriel
Bauman, Glenn S.
Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
title Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
title_full Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
title_short Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
title_sort proton radiotherapy for management of medulloblastoma: a systematic review of clinical outcomes
topic Critical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101189
work_keys_str_mv AT youngsympascho protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes
AT phaterpekarkiran protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes
AT tsangdereks protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes
AT boldtgabriel protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes
AT baumanglenns protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes