Cargando…
Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to comprehensively review all studies examining clinical outcomes of craniospinal irradiation with proton radiotherapy for medulloblastoma (MB) to determine whether theoretical dosimetric advantages have translated into superior clinical outcomes (including surviva...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101189 |
_version_ | 1785014764395560960 |
---|---|
author | Young, Sympascho Phaterpekar, Kiran Tsang, Derek S. Boldt, Gabriel Bauman, Glenn S. |
author_facet | Young, Sympascho Phaterpekar, Kiran Tsang, Derek S. Boldt, Gabriel Bauman, Glenn S. |
author_sort | Young, Sympascho |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to comprehensively review all studies examining clinical outcomes of craniospinal irradiation with proton radiotherapy for medulloblastoma (MB) to determine whether theoretical dosimetric advantages have translated into superior clinical outcomes (including survival and toxicities) compared with traditional photon-based techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles reporting on clinical outcomes of pediatric and/or adult patients with MB treated with proton radiotherapy were included. Evidence quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa scale and GRADE score. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included, with a total of 2059 patients reported (representing an estimated 630-654 unique patients). None of the studies were randomized, 12 were comparative, 9 were prospective, 3 were mixed, and 22 were retrospective. Average mean/median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 4 weeks to 12.6 years). The majority of studies (n = 19) reported on treatment with passive scatter proton beams exclusively. Average study quality was 6.0 out of 9 (median, 6; standard deviation, 1.6). Nine studies scored ≥8 out of 9 on the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale; an overall “moderate” GRADE score was assigned. Well-designed comparative cohort studies with adequate follow-up demonstrate superior neurocognitive outcomes, lower incidence of hypothyroidism (23% vs 69%), sex hormone deficiency (3% vs 19%), greater heights, and reduced acute toxicities in patients treated with protons compared to photons. Overall survival (up to 10 years), progression-free survival (up to 10 years), brain stem injury, and other endocrine outcomes were similar to those reported for photon radiation. There was insufficient evidence to make conclusions on endpoints of quality of life, ototoxicity, secondary malignancy, alopecia, scoliosis, cavernomas, and cerebral vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-grade evidence supports proton radiotherapy as a preferred treatment for craniospinal irradiation of MB based on equivalent disease control and comparable-to-improved toxicity versus photon beam radiation therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10051027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100510272023-03-30 Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes Young, Sympascho Phaterpekar, Kiran Tsang, Derek S. Boldt, Gabriel Bauman, Glenn S. Adv Radiat Oncol Critical Review PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to comprehensively review all studies examining clinical outcomes of craniospinal irradiation with proton radiotherapy for medulloblastoma (MB) to determine whether theoretical dosimetric advantages have translated into superior clinical outcomes (including survival and toxicities) compared with traditional photon-based techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles reporting on clinical outcomes of pediatric and/or adult patients with MB treated with proton radiotherapy were included. Evidence quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa scale and GRADE score. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included, with a total of 2059 patients reported (representing an estimated 630-654 unique patients). None of the studies were randomized, 12 were comparative, 9 were prospective, 3 were mixed, and 22 were retrospective. Average mean/median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 4 weeks to 12.6 years). The majority of studies (n = 19) reported on treatment with passive scatter proton beams exclusively. Average study quality was 6.0 out of 9 (median, 6; standard deviation, 1.6). Nine studies scored ≥8 out of 9 on the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale; an overall “moderate” GRADE score was assigned. Well-designed comparative cohort studies with adequate follow-up demonstrate superior neurocognitive outcomes, lower incidence of hypothyroidism (23% vs 69%), sex hormone deficiency (3% vs 19%), greater heights, and reduced acute toxicities in patients treated with protons compared to photons. Overall survival (up to 10 years), progression-free survival (up to 10 years), brain stem injury, and other endocrine outcomes were similar to those reported for photon radiation. There was insufficient evidence to make conclusions on endpoints of quality of life, ototoxicity, secondary malignancy, alopecia, scoliosis, cavernomas, and cerebral vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-grade evidence supports proton radiotherapy as a preferred treatment for craniospinal irradiation of MB based on equivalent disease control and comparable-to-improved toxicity versus photon beam radiation therapy. Elsevier 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10051027/ /pubmed/37008255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101189 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Critical Review Young, Sympascho Phaterpekar, Kiran Tsang, Derek S. Boldt, Gabriel Bauman, Glenn S. Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes |
title | Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes |
title_full | Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes |
title_short | Proton Radiotherapy for Management of Medulloblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes |
title_sort | proton radiotherapy for management of medulloblastoma: a systematic review of clinical outcomes |
topic | Critical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngsympascho protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes AT phaterpekarkiran protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes AT tsangdereks protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes AT boldtgabriel protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes AT baumanglenns protonradiotherapyformanagementofmedulloblastomaasystematicreviewofclinicaloutcomes |