Cargando…

Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral

Aim Since the introduction of the target referral system, there has been controversy about its value and whether it affected the short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer surgeries. With contradicting results, this study highlights differences in personal and tumour characteristics, managem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elnaggar, Mahmoud, Pratheepan, Ponnuthurai, Paramagurunathan, Baskaran, Colemeadow, Josie, Hussein, Basim, Bashkirova, Varvara, Pillai, Kavya, Singh, Lucy, Chawla, Mehar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009351
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36840
_version_ 1785014771941113856
author Elnaggar, Mahmoud
Pratheepan, Ponnuthurai
Paramagurunathan, Baskaran
Colemeadow, Josie
Hussein, Basim
Bashkirova, Varvara
Pillai, Kavya
Singh, Lucy
Chawla, Mehar
author_facet Elnaggar, Mahmoud
Pratheepan, Ponnuthurai
Paramagurunathan, Baskaran
Colemeadow, Josie
Hussein, Basim
Bashkirova, Varvara
Pillai, Kavya
Singh, Lucy
Chawla, Mehar
author_sort Elnaggar, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description Aim Since the introduction of the target referral system, there has been controversy about its value and whether it affected the short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer surgeries. With contradicting results, this study highlights differences in personal and tumour characteristics, management differences, and outcomes in each referral pathway, including target pathway referrals for suspected cancers, emergency presentations, routine referrals, and incidentally discovered cancers during screening. Methods A retrospective study of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients operated on between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, with records dating to the end of the five-year follow-up, was extracted anonymously from the database of CRC outcomes at the North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London. The total number of patients operated on through the four pathways was 176, with full records and competent follow-ups. Patients were classified according to the mode of referral: two-week wait (2WW or target), routine, emergency, and incidental discovery referrals. Comparisons were made between these groups with regard to personal and tumour characteristics, management, and outcome. Results It has been demonstrated by this study that target referrals present mainly with stage I cancers as compared to emergency referrals that present with more stage II (IIa+ IIb+ IIc). The highest percentage of cancer locations within the large bowel was rectal, followed by sigmoid in both target and emergency groups; 8.8% of target patients needed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the form of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy protocol with the addition of radiotherapy in patients with advanced rectal cancers, compared to 13.3% of emergency patients. Conclusion The colorectal 2WW system was the main pathway supplying colorectal cancer operations; it mostly showed earlier cancers than the other referral groups; its cancers were mostly rectosigmoid with less need for adjuvant chemotherapy; fewer recurrences; and it also showed a lower five-year mortality rate than the emergency group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10051034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100510342023-03-30 Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral Elnaggar, Mahmoud Pratheepan, Ponnuthurai Paramagurunathan, Baskaran Colemeadow, Josie Hussein, Basim Bashkirova, Varvara Pillai, Kavya Singh, Lucy Chawla, Mehar Cureus General Surgery Aim Since the introduction of the target referral system, there has been controversy about its value and whether it affected the short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer surgeries. With contradicting results, this study highlights differences in personal and tumour characteristics, management differences, and outcomes in each referral pathway, including target pathway referrals for suspected cancers, emergency presentations, routine referrals, and incidentally discovered cancers during screening. Methods A retrospective study of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients operated on between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, with records dating to the end of the five-year follow-up, was extracted anonymously from the database of CRC outcomes at the North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London. The total number of patients operated on through the four pathways was 176, with full records and competent follow-ups. Patients were classified according to the mode of referral: two-week wait (2WW or target), routine, emergency, and incidental discovery referrals. Comparisons were made between these groups with regard to personal and tumour characteristics, management, and outcome. Results It has been demonstrated by this study that target referrals present mainly with stage I cancers as compared to emergency referrals that present with more stage II (IIa+ IIb+ IIc). The highest percentage of cancer locations within the large bowel was rectal, followed by sigmoid in both target and emergency groups; 8.8% of target patients needed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the form of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy protocol with the addition of radiotherapy in patients with advanced rectal cancers, compared to 13.3% of emergency patients. Conclusion The colorectal 2WW system was the main pathway supplying colorectal cancer operations; it mostly showed earlier cancers than the other referral groups; its cancers were mostly rectosigmoid with less need for adjuvant chemotherapy; fewer recurrences; and it also showed a lower five-year mortality rate than the emergency group. Cureus 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10051034/ /pubmed/37009351 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36840 Text en Copyright © 2023, Elnaggar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Elnaggar, Mahmoud
Pratheepan, Ponnuthurai
Paramagurunathan, Baskaran
Colemeadow, Josie
Hussein, Basim
Bashkirova, Varvara
Pillai, Kavya
Singh, Lucy
Chawla, Mehar
Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral
title Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral
title_full Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral
title_fullStr Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral
title_short Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral
title_sort outcome of operated colorectal cancers in relation to the type of initial referral
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37009351
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36840
work_keys_str_mv AT elnaggarmahmoud outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT pratheepanponnuthurai outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT paramagurunathanbaskaran outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT colemeadowjosie outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT husseinbasim outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT bashkirovavarvara outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT pillaikavya outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT singhlucy outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral
AT chawlamehar outcomeofoperatedcolorectalcancersinrelationtothetypeofinitialreferral