Cargando…

Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Cori, Andrea, Parollo, Matteo, Fiorentini, Federico, Della Volpe, Salvatore, Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo, Barletta, Valentina, Segreti, Luca, Viani, Stefano, De Lucia, Raffaele, Paperini, Luca, Canu, Antonio, Grifoni, Gino, Soldati, Ezio, Bongiorni, Maria Grazia, Zucchelli, Giulio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062388
_version_ 1785014868916568064
author Di Cori, Andrea
Parollo, Matteo
Fiorentini, Federico
Della Volpe, Salvatore
Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo
Barletta, Valentina
Segreti, Luca
Viani, Stefano
De Lucia, Raffaele
Paperini, Luca
Canu, Antonio
Grifoni, Gino
Soldati, Ezio
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
Zucchelli, Giulio
author_facet Di Cori, Andrea
Parollo, Matteo
Fiorentini, Federico
Della Volpe, Salvatore
Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo
Barletta, Valentina
Segreti, Luca
Viani, Stefano
De Lucia, Raffaele
Paperini, Luca
Canu, Antonio
Grifoni, Gino
Soldati, Ezio
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
Zucchelli, Giulio
author_sort Di Cori, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used in ICU. No data on CNBP reliability are available in the electrophysiology lab during AF ablation, where rhythm variations are common. Background: The objective of the present study was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method during AF ablation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 11 years, 80% male) undergoing transcatheter AF ablation (62% paroxysmal, 38% persistent) at our center. Standard of care IBP monitoring via a radial cannula and a contralateral noninvasive finger volume-clamp CNBP measurement device were positioned simultaneously in all patients for the entire procedure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. Results: A total of 1219 paired measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were obtained in 55 subjects, with a mean (SD) of 22 (9) measurements per patient. The mean bias (SD) was −12.97 (13.89) mmHg for systolic pressure (level of agreement −14.24–40.20; correlation coefficient 0.84), −1.85 (8.52) mmHg for diastolic pressure (level of agreement −18.54–14.84; correlation coefficient 0.77) and 2.31 (8.75) mmHg for mean pressure (level of agreement −14.84–19.46; correlation coefficient 0.85). Conclusion: In patients undergoing AF ablation, CNBP monitoring with the ClearSight device showed acceptable agreement with IBP monitoring. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential clinical implications of continuous noninvasive BP monitoring during AF ablation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10051367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100513672023-03-30 Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Di Cori, Andrea Parollo, Matteo Fiorentini, Federico Della Volpe, Salvatore Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo Barletta, Valentina Segreti, Luca Viani, Stefano De Lucia, Raffaele Paperini, Luca Canu, Antonio Grifoni, Gino Soldati, Ezio Bongiorni, Maria Grazia Zucchelli, Giulio J Clin Med Article Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used in ICU. No data on CNBP reliability are available in the electrophysiology lab during AF ablation, where rhythm variations are common. Background: The objective of the present study was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method during AF ablation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 11 years, 80% male) undergoing transcatheter AF ablation (62% paroxysmal, 38% persistent) at our center. Standard of care IBP monitoring via a radial cannula and a contralateral noninvasive finger volume-clamp CNBP measurement device were positioned simultaneously in all patients for the entire procedure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. Results: A total of 1219 paired measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were obtained in 55 subjects, with a mean (SD) of 22 (9) measurements per patient. The mean bias (SD) was −12.97 (13.89) mmHg for systolic pressure (level of agreement −14.24–40.20; correlation coefficient 0.84), −1.85 (8.52) mmHg for diastolic pressure (level of agreement −18.54–14.84; correlation coefficient 0.77) and 2.31 (8.75) mmHg for mean pressure (level of agreement −14.84–19.46; correlation coefficient 0.85). Conclusion: In patients undergoing AF ablation, CNBP monitoring with the ClearSight device showed acceptable agreement with IBP monitoring. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential clinical implications of continuous noninvasive BP monitoring during AF ablation. MDPI 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10051367/ /pubmed/36983388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062388 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Cori, Andrea
Parollo, Matteo
Fiorentini, Federico
Della Volpe, Salvatore
Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo
Barletta, Valentina
Segreti, Luca
Viani, Stefano
De Lucia, Raffaele
Paperini, Luca
Canu, Antonio
Grifoni, Gino
Soldati, Ezio
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
Zucchelli, Giulio
Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
title Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
title_full Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
title_fullStr Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
title_short Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
title_sort feasibility and accuracy of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring during transcatheter atrial fibrillation ablation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062388
work_keys_str_mv AT dicoriandrea feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT parollomatteo feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT fiorentinifederico feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT dellavolpesalvatore feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT mazzocchettilorenzo feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT barlettavalentina feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT segretiluca feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT vianistefano feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT deluciaraffaele feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT paperiniluca feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT canuantonio feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT grifonigino feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT soldatiezio feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT bongiornimariagrazia feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation
AT zucchelligiulio feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation