Cargando…
Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062388 |
_version_ | 1785014868916568064 |
---|---|
author | Di Cori, Andrea Parollo, Matteo Fiorentini, Federico Della Volpe, Salvatore Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo Barletta, Valentina Segreti, Luca Viani, Stefano De Lucia, Raffaele Paperini, Luca Canu, Antonio Grifoni, Gino Soldati, Ezio Bongiorni, Maria Grazia Zucchelli, Giulio |
author_facet | Di Cori, Andrea Parollo, Matteo Fiorentini, Federico Della Volpe, Salvatore Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo Barletta, Valentina Segreti, Luca Viani, Stefano De Lucia, Raffaele Paperini, Luca Canu, Antonio Grifoni, Gino Soldati, Ezio Bongiorni, Maria Grazia Zucchelli, Giulio |
author_sort | Di Cori, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used in ICU. No data on CNBP reliability are available in the electrophysiology lab during AF ablation, where rhythm variations are common. Background: The objective of the present study was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method during AF ablation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 11 years, 80% male) undergoing transcatheter AF ablation (62% paroxysmal, 38% persistent) at our center. Standard of care IBP monitoring via a radial cannula and a contralateral noninvasive finger volume-clamp CNBP measurement device were positioned simultaneously in all patients for the entire procedure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. Results: A total of 1219 paired measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were obtained in 55 subjects, with a mean (SD) of 22 (9) measurements per patient. The mean bias (SD) was −12.97 (13.89) mmHg for systolic pressure (level of agreement −14.24–40.20; correlation coefficient 0.84), −1.85 (8.52) mmHg for diastolic pressure (level of agreement −18.54–14.84; correlation coefficient 0.77) and 2.31 (8.75) mmHg for mean pressure (level of agreement −14.84–19.46; correlation coefficient 0.85). Conclusion: In patients undergoing AF ablation, CNBP monitoring with the ClearSight device showed acceptable agreement with IBP monitoring. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential clinical implications of continuous noninvasive BP monitoring during AF ablation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10051367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100513672023-03-30 Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Di Cori, Andrea Parollo, Matteo Fiorentini, Federico Della Volpe, Salvatore Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo Barletta, Valentina Segreti, Luca Viani, Stefano De Lucia, Raffaele Paperini, Luca Canu, Antonio Grifoni, Gino Soldati, Ezio Bongiorni, Maria Grazia Zucchelli, Giulio J Clin Med Article Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used in ICU. No data on CNBP reliability are available in the electrophysiology lab during AF ablation, where rhythm variations are common. Background: The objective of the present study was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method during AF ablation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 11 years, 80% male) undergoing transcatheter AF ablation (62% paroxysmal, 38% persistent) at our center. Standard of care IBP monitoring via a radial cannula and a contralateral noninvasive finger volume-clamp CNBP measurement device were positioned simultaneously in all patients for the entire procedure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. Results: A total of 1219 paired measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were obtained in 55 subjects, with a mean (SD) of 22 (9) measurements per patient. The mean bias (SD) was −12.97 (13.89) mmHg for systolic pressure (level of agreement −14.24–40.20; correlation coefficient 0.84), −1.85 (8.52) mmHg for diastolic pressure (level of agreement −18.54–14.84; correlation coefficient 0.77) and 2.31 (8.75) mmHg for mean pressure (level of agreement −14.84–19.46; correlation coefficient 0.85). Conclusion: In patients undergoing AF ablation, CNBP monitoring with the ClearSight device showed acceptable agreement with IBP monitoring. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential clinical implications of continuous noninvasive BP monitoring during AF ablation. MDPI 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10051367/ /pubmed/36983388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062388 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Di Cori, Andrea Parollo, Matteo Fiorentini, Federico Della Volpe, Salvatore Mazzocchetti, Lorenzo Barletta, Valentina Segreti, Luca Viani, Stefano De Lucia, Raffaele Paperini, Luca Canu, Antonio Grifoni, Gino Soldati, Ezio Bongiorni, Maria Grazia Zucchelli, Giulio Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation |
title | Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation |
title_full | Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation |
title_short | Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation |
title_sort | feasibility and accuracy of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring during transcatheter atrial fibrillation ablation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dicoriandrea feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT parollomatteo feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT fiorentinifederico feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT dellavolpesalvatore feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT mazzocchettilorenzo feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT barlettavalentina feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT segretiluca feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT vianistefano feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT deluciaraffaele feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT paperiniluca feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT canuantonio feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT grifonigino feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT soldatiezio feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT bongiornimariagrazia feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation AT zucchelligiulio feasibilityandaccuracyofnoninvasivecontinuousarterialpressuremonitoringduringtranscatheteratrialfibrillationablation |