Cargando…
Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize?
Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide. Procedure difficulty and patient outcomes depend on several factors which are not considered in the current literature, including the learning curve, generating confusing and subjective res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030446 |
_version_ | 1785014891685347328 |
---|---|
author | Reitano, Elisa Famularo, Simone Dallemagne, Bernard Mishima, Kohei Perretta, Silvana Riva, Pietro Addeo, Pietro Asbun, Horacio J. Conrad, Claudius Demartines, Nicolas Fuks, David Gimenez, Mariano Hogg, Melissa E. Lin, Charles Chung-Wei Marescaux, Jacques Martinie, John B. Memeo, Riccardo Soubrane, Olivier Vix, Michel Wang, Xiaoying Mutter, Didier |
author_facet | Reitano, Elisa Famularo, Simone Dallemagne, Bernard Mishima, Kohei Perretta, Silvana Riva, Pietro Addeo, Pietro Asbun, Horacio J. Conrad, Claudius Demartines, Nicolas Fuks, David Gimenez, Mariano Hogg, Melissa E. Lin, Charles Chung-Wei Marescaux, Jacques Martinie, John B. Memeo, Riccardo Soubrane, Olivier Vix, Michel Wang, Xiaoying Mutter, Didier |
author_sort | Reitano, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide. Procedure difficulty and patient outcomes depend on several factors which are not considered in the current literature, including the learning curve, generating confusing and subjective results. This study aims to create a scoring system to calculate the learning curve of LC based on hepatobiliopancreatic (HPB) experts’ opinions during an educational course. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was submitted to the panel of experts attending the HPB course at Research Institute against Digestive Cancer-IRCAD (Strasbourg, France) from 27–29 October 2022. Experts scored the proposed variables according to their degree of importance in the learning curve using a Likert scale from 1 (not useful) to 5 (very useful). Variables were included in the composite scoring system only if more than 75% of experts ranked its relevance in the learning curve assessment ≥4. A positive or negative value was assigned to each variable based on its effect on the learning curve. Results: Fifteen experts from six different countries attended the IRCAD HPB course and filled out the questionnaire. Ten variables were finally included in the learning curve scoring system (i.e., patient body weight/BMI, patient previous open surgery, emergency setting, increased inflammatory levels, presence of anatomical bile duct variation(s), and appropriate critical view of safety (CVS) identification), which were all assigned positive values. Minor or major intraoperative injuries to the biliary tract, development of postoperative complications related to biliary injuries, and mortality were assigned negative values. Conclusions: This is the first scoring system on the learning curve of LC based on variables selected through the experts’ opinions. Although the score needs to be validated through future studies, it could be a useful tool to assess its efficacy within educational programs and surgical courses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10051458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100514582023-03-30 Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? Reitano, Elisa Famularo, Simone Dallemagne, Bernard Mishima, Kohei Perretta, Silvana Riva, Pietro Addeo, Pietro Asbun, Horacio J. Conrad, Claudius Demartines, Nicolas Fuks, David Gimenez, Mariano Hogg, Melissa E. Lin, Charles Chung-Wei Marescaux, Jacques Martinie, John B. Memeo, Riccardo Soubrane, Olivier Vix, Michel Wang, Xiaoying Mutter, Didier Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide. Procedure difficulty and patient outcomes depend on several factors which are not considered in the current literature, including the learning curve, generating confusing and subjective results. This study aims to create a scoring system to calculate the learning curve of LC based on hepatobiliopancreatic (HPB) experts’ opinions during an educational course. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was submitted to the panel of experts attending the HPB course at Research Institute against Digestive Cancer-IRCAD (Strasbourg, France) from 27–29 October 2022. Experts scored the proposed variables according to their degree of importance in the learning curve using a Likert scale from 1 (not useful) to 5 (very useful). Variables were included in the composite scoring system only if more than 75% of experts ranked its relevance in the learning curve assessment ≥4. A positive or negative value was assigned to each variable based on its effect on the learning curve. Results: Fifteen experts from six different countries attended the IRCAD HPB course and filled out the questionnaire. Ten variables were finally included in the learning curve scoring system (i.e., patient body weight/BMI, patient previous open surgery, emergency setting, increased inflammatory levels, presence of anatomical bile duct variation(s), and appropriate critical view of safety (CVS) identification), which were all assigned positive values. Minor or major intraoperative injuries to the biliary tract, development of postoperative complications related to biliary injuries, and mortality were assigned negative values. Conclusions: This is the first scoring system on the learning curve of LC based on variables selected through the experts’ opinions. Although the score needs to be validated through future studies, it could be a useful tool to assess its efficacy within educational programs and surgical courses. MDPI 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10051458/ /pubmed/36984446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030446 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Reitano, Elisa Famularo, Simone Dallemagne, Bernard Mishima, Kohei Perretta, Silvana Riva, Pietro Addeo, Pietro Asbun, Horacio J. Conrad, Claudius Demartines, Nicolas Fuks, David Gimenez, Mariano Hogg, Melissa E. Lin, Charles Chung-Wei Marescaux, Jacques Martinie, John B. Memeo, Riccardo Soubrane, Olivier Vix, Michel Wang, Xiaoying Mutter, Didier Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? |
title | Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? |
title_full | Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? |
title_fullStr | Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? |
title_full_unstemmed | Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? |
title_short | Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize? |
title_sort | educational scoring system in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it the right time to standardize? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reitanoelisa educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT famularosimone educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT dallemagnebernard educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT mishimakohei educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT perrettasilvana educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT rivapietro educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT addeopietro educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT asbunhoracioj educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT conradclaudius educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT demartinesnicolas educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT fuksdavid educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT gimenezmariano educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT hoggmelissae educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT lincharleschungwei educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT marescauxjacques educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT martiniejohnb educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT memeoriccardo educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT soubraneolivier educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT vixmichel educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT wangxiaoying educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize AT mutterdidier educationalscoringsysteminlaparoscopiccholecystectomyisittherighttimetostandardize |