Cargando…
The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062313 |
_version_ | 1785014915640066048 |
---|---|
author | Iwaki, Kentaro Kaihara, Satoshi Koyama, Tatsuya Nakao, Kai Matsuda, Shotaro Toriguchi, Kan Kitamura, Koji Oshima, Nobu Kondo, Masato Hashida, Hiroki Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Uryuhara, Kenji |
author_facet | Iwaki, Kentaro Kaihara, Satoshi Koyama, Tatsuya Nakao, Kai Matsuda, Shotaro Toriguchi, Kan Kitamura, Koji Oshima, Nobu Kondo, Masato Hashida, Hiroki Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Uryuhara, Kenji |
author_sort | Iwaki, Kentaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10051553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100515532023-03-30 The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection Iwaki, Kentaro Kaihara, Satoshi Koyama, Tatsuya Nakao, Kai Matsuda, Shotaro Toriguchi, Kan Kitamura, Koji Oshima, Nobu Kondo, Masato Hashida, Hiroki Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Uryuhara, Kenji J Clin Med Article Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence. MDPI 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10051553/ /pubmed/36983314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062313 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Iwaki, Kentaro Kaihara, Satoshi Koyama, Tatsuya Nakao, Kai Matsuda, Shotaro Toriguchi, Kan Kitamura, Koji Oshima, Nobu Kondo, Masato Hashida, Hiroki Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Uryuhara, Kenji The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection |
title | The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection |
title_full | The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection |
title_fullStr | The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection |
title_short | The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection |
title_sort | impact of kras status on the required surgical margin width for colorectal liver metastasis resection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwakikentaro theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kaiharasatoshi theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT koyamatatsuya theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT nakaokai theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT matsudashotaro theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT toriguchikan theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kitamurakoji theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT oshimanobu theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kondomasato theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT hashidahiroki theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kobayashihiroyuki theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT uryuharakenji theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT iwakikentaro impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kaiharasatoshi impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT koyamatatsuya impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT nakaokai impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT matsudashotaro impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT toriguchikan impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kitamurakoji impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT oshimanobu impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kondomasato impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT hashidahiroki impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT kobayashihiroyuki impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection AT uryuharakenji impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection |