Cargando…

The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection

Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwaki, Kentaro, Kaihara, Satoshi, Koyama, Tatsuya, Nakao, Kai, Matsuda, Shotaro, Toriguchi, Kan, Kitamura, Koji, Oshima, Nobu, Kondo, Masato, Hashida, Hiroki, Kobayashi, Hiroyuki, Uryuhara, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062313
_version_ 1785014915640066048
author Iwaki, Kentaro
Kaihara, Satoshi
Koyama, Tatsuya
Nakao, Kai
Matsuda, Shotaro
Toriguchi, Kan
Kitamura, Koji
Oshima, Nobu
Kondo, Masato
Hashida, Hiroki
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Uryuhara, Kenji
author_facet Iwaki, Kentaro
Kaihara, Satoshi
Koyama, Tatsuya
Nakao, Kai
Matsuda, Shotaro
Toriguchi, Kan
Kitamura, Koji
Oshima, Nobu
Kondo, Masato
Hashida, Hiroki
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Uryuhara, Kenji
author_sort Iwaki, Kentaro
collection PubMed
description Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10051553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100515532023-03-30 The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection Iwaki, Kentaro Kaihara, Satoshi Koyama, Tatsuya Nakao, Kai Matsuda, Shotaro Toriguchi, Kan Kitamura, Koji Oshima, Nobu Kondo, Masato Hashida, Hiroki Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Uryuhara, Kenji J Clin Med Article Local recurrence after colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) resection severely affects survival; however, the required surgical margin width remains controversial. This study investigated the impact of KRAS status on surgical margin width and local recurrence rate (LRR) post-CRLM resection. Overall, 146 resected CRLMs with KRAS status (wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS): 98, KRAS mutant (mKRAS): 48) were included. The LRR for each group, R1 (margin positive) and R0 (margin negative), was analyzed by KRAS status. R0 was further stratified into Ra (margin ≥ 5 mm) and Rb (margin < 5 mm). Patients with local recurrence had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those without local recurrence (p = 0.0036). The mKRAS LRR was significantly higher than wtKRAS LRR (p = 0.0145). R1 resection resulted in significantly higher LRRs than R0 resection for both wtKRAS and mKRAS (p = 0.0068 and p = 0.0204, respectively), and while no significant difference was observed in the Ra and Rb LRR with wtKRAS, the Rb LRR with mKRAS (33.3%) was significantly higher than Ra LRR (5.9%) (p = 0.0289). Thus, R0 resection is sufficient for CRLM with wtKRAS; however, CRLM with mKRAS requires resection with a margin of at least 5 mm to prevent local recurrence. MDPI 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10051553/ /pubmed/36983314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062313 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iwaki, Kentaro
Kaihara, Satoshi
Koyama, Tatsuya
Nakao, Kai
Matsuda, Shotaro
Toriguchi, Kan
Kitamura, Koji
Oshima, Nobu
Kondo, Masato
Hashida, Hiroki
Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
Uryuhara, Kenji
The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
title The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
title_full The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
title_fullStr The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
title_short The Impact of KRAS Status on the Required Surgical Margin Width for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection
title_sort impact of kras status on the required surgical margin width for colorectal liver metastasis resection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062313
work_keys_str_mv AT iwakikentaro theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kaiharasatoshi theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT koyamatatsuya theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT nakaokai theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT matsudashotaro theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT toriguchikan theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kitamurakoji theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT oshimanobu theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kondomasato theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT hashidahiroki theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kobayashihiroyuki theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT uryuharakenji theimpactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT iwakikentaro impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kaiharasatoshi impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT koyamatatsuya impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT nakaokai impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT matsudashotaro impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT toriguchikan impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kitamurakoji impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT oshimanobu impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kondomasato impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT hashidahiroki impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT kobayashihiroyuki impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection
AT uryuharakenji impactofkrasstatusontherequiredsurgicalmarginwidthforcolorectallivermetastasisresection