Cargando…
Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062139 |
_version_ | 1785014948167942144 |
---|---|
author | Koda, Hiroki Matsumoto, Kazuya Kawata, Soichiro Takeda, Yohei Onoyama, Takumi Seki, Yuta Sakamoto, Yuri Shimosaka, Takuya Hamamoto, Wataru Yamashita, Taro Kurumi, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Naoyuki Noma, Hisashi Isomoto, Hajime |
author_facet | Koda, Hiroki Matsumoto, Kazuya Kawata, Soichiro Takeda, Yohei Onoyama, Takumi Seki, Yuta Sakamoto, Yuri Shimosaka, Takuya Hamamoto, Wataru Yamashita, Taro Kurumi, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Naoyuki Noma, Hisashi Isomoto, Hajime |
author_sort | Koda, Hiroki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the obtained sample. This study investigated the usefulness of a target sample check illuminator (TSCI) that emits a specific wavelength of light to determine the presence of target specimens. Twenty-seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our hospital were included. Conventional white light observation was performed for the collected samples, followed by TSCI; six people evaluated the presence of the target specimen on a 5-point scale. The target specimen discrimination score using TSCI (median: 5) was significantly higher than that using conventional white light observation (median: 1) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discrimination score between the evaluator (novice vs. expert, p = 0.162) and puncture needle (22G vs. 25G, p = 0.196). The discriminability of TSCI in the samples obtained using EUS-FNA was significantly higher than that of conventional observation. TSCI does not depend on the evaluator or puncture needle for the identification of the target specimen; hence, it can provide a good pathological specimen and may contribute to the improvement of the diagnostic ability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10051683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100516832023-03-30 Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample Koda, Hiroki Matsumoto, Kazuya Kawata, Soichiro Takeda, Yohei Onoyama, Takumi Seki, Yuta Sakamoto, Yuri Shimosaka, Takuya Hamamoto, Wataru Yamashita, Taro Kurumi, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Naoyuki Noma, Hisashi Isomoto, Hajime J Clin Med Article Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the obtained sample. This study investigated the usefulness of a target sample check illuminator (TSCI) that emits a specific wavelength of light to determine the presence of target specimens. Twenty-seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our hospital were included. Conventional white light observation was performed for the collected samples, followed by TSCI; six people evaluated the presence of the target specimen on a 5-point scale. The target specimen discrimination score using TSCI (median: 5) was significantly higher than that using conventional white light observation (median: 1) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discrimination score between the evaluator (novice vs. expert, p = 0.162) and puncture needle (22G vs. 25G, p = 0.196). The discriminability of TSCI in the samples obtained using EUS-FNA was significantly higher than that of conventional observation. TSCI does not depend on the evaluator or puncture needle for the identification of the target specimen; hence, it can provide a good pathological specimen and may contribute to the improvement of the diagnostic ability. MDPI 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10051683/ /pubmed/36983143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062139 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Koda, Hiroki Matsumoto, Kazuya Kawata, Soichiro Takeda, Yohei Onoyama, Takumi Seki, Yuta Sakamoto, Yuri Shimosaka, Takuya Hamamoto, Wataru Yamashita, Taro Kurumi, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Naoyuki Noma, Hisashi Isomoto, Hajime Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample |
title | Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample |
title_full | Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample |
title_short | Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample |
title_sort | comparison between target sample check illuminator and white light observation in discriminating the presence of target specimen for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration sample |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kodahiroki comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT matsumotokazuya comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT kawatasoichiro comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT takedayohei comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT onoyamatakumi comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT sekiyuta comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT sakamotoyuri comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT shimosakatakuya comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT hamamotowataru comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT yamashitataro comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT kurumihiroki comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT yamaguchinaoyuki comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT nomahisashi comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample AT isomotohajime comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample |