Cargando…

Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koda, Hiroki, Matsumoto, Kazuya, Kawata, Soichiro, Takeda, Yohei, Onoyama, Takumi, Seki, Yuta, Sakamoto, Yuri, Shimosaka, Takuya, Hamamoto, Wataru, Yamashita, Taro, Kurumi, Hiroki, Yamaguchi, Naoyuki, Noma, Hisashi, Isomoto, Hajime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062139
_version_ 1785014948167942144
author Koda, Hiroki
Matsumoto, Kazuya
Kawata, Soichiro
Takeda, Yohei
Onoyama, Takumi
Seki, Yuta
Sakamoto, Yuri
Shimosaka, Takuya
Hamamoto, Wataru
Yamashita, Taro
Kurumi, Hiroki
Yamaguchi, Naoyuki
Noma, Hisashi
Isomoto, Hajime
author_facet Koda, Hiroki
Matsumoto, Kazuya
Kawata, Soichiro
Takeda, Yohei
Onoyama, Takumi
Seki, Yuta
Sakamoto, Yuri
Shimosaka, Takuya
Hamamoto, Wataru
Yamashita, Taro
Kurumi, Hiroki
Yamaguchi, Naoyuki
Noma, Hisashi
Isomoto, Hajime
author_sort Koda, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the obtained sample. This study investigated the usefulness of a target sample check illuminator (TSCI) that emits a specific wavelength of light to determine the presence of target specimens. Twenty-seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our hospital were included. Conventional white light observation was performed for the collected samples, followed by TSCI; six people evaluated the presence of the target specimen on a 5-point scale. The target specimen discrimination score using TSCI (median: 5) was significantly higher than that using conventional white light observation (median: 1) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discrimination score between the evaluator (novice vs. expert, p = 0.162) and puncture needle (22G vs. 25G, p = 0.196). The discriminability of TSCI in the samples obtained using EUS-FNA was significantly higher than that of conventional observation. TSCI does not depend on the evaluator or puncture needle for the identification of the target specimen; hence, it can provide a good pathological specimen and may contribute to the improvement of the diagnostic ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10051683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100516832023-03-30 Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample Koda, Hiroki Matsumoto, Kazuya Kawata, Soichiro Takeda, Yohei Onoyama, Takumi Seki, Yuta Sakamoto, Yuri Shimosaka, Takuya Hamamoto, Wataru Yamashita, Taro Kurumi, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Naoyuki Noma, Hisashi Isomoto, Hajime J Clin Med Article Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the obtained sample. This study investigated the usefulness of a target sample check illuminator (TSCI) that emits a specific wavelength of light to determine the presence of target specimens. Twenty-seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our hospital were included. Conventional white light observation was performed for the collected samples, followed by TSCI; six people evaluated the presence of the target specimen on a 5-point scale. The target specimen discrimination score using TSCI (median: 5) was significantly higher than that using conventional white light observation (median: 1) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discrimination score between the evaluator (novice vs. expert, p = 0.162) and puncture needle (22G vs. 25G, p = 0.196). The discriminability of TSCI in the samples obtained using EUS-FNA was significantly higher than that of conventional observation. TSCI does not depend on the evaluator or puncture needle for the identification of the target specimen; hence, it can provide a good pathological specimen and may contribute to the improvement of the diagnostic ability. MDPI 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10051683/ /pubmed/36983143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062139 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Koda, Hiroki
Matsumoto, Kazuya
Kawata, Soichiro
Takeda, Yohei
Onoyama, Takumi
Seki, Yuta
Sakamoto, Yuri
Shimosaka, Takuya
Hamamoto, Wataru
Yamashita, Taro
Kurumi, Hiroki
Yamaguchi, Naoyuki
Noma, Hisashi
Isomoto, Hajime
Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
title Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
title_full Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
title_fullStr Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
title_short Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample
title_sort comparison between target sample check illuminator and white light observation in discriminating the presence of target specimen for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration sample
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10051683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062139
work_keys_str_mv AT kodahiroki comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT matsumotokazuya comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT kawatasoichiro comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT takedayohei comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT onoyamatakumi comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT sekiyuta comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT sakamotoyuri comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT shimosakatakuya comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT hamamotowataru comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT yamashitataro comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT kurumihiroki comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT yamaguchinaoyuki comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT nomahisashi comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample
AT isomotohajime comparisonbetweentargetsamplecheckilluminatorandwhitelightobservationindiscriminatingthepresenceoftargetspecimenforendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationsample