Cargando…

Quantitative Complexity Theory (QCT) in Integrative Analysis of Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Response to Posture Change

The explanation of physiological mechanisms involved in adaptation of the cardiovascular system to intrinsic and environmental demands is crucial for both basic science and clinical research. Computational algorithms integrating multivariable data that comprehensively depict complex mechanisms of ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krzesiński, Paweł, Marczyk, Jacek, Wolszczak, Bartosz, Gielerak, Grzegorz Gerard, Accardi, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13030632
Descripción
Sumario:The explanation of physiological mechanisms involved in adaptation of the cardiovascular system to intrinsic and environmental demands is crucial for both basic science and clinical research. Computational algorithms integrating multivariable data that comprehensively depict complex mechanisms of cardiovascular reactivity are currently being intensively researched. Quantitative Complexity Theory (QCT) provides quantitative and holistic information on the state of multi-functional dynamic systems. The present paper aimed to describe the application of QCT in an integrative analysis of the cardiovascular hemodynamic response to posture change. Three subjects that underwent head-up tilt testing under beat-by-beat hemodynamic monitoring (impedance cardiography) were discussed in relation to the complexity trends calculated using QCT software. Complexity has been shown to be a sensitive marker of a cardiovascular hemodynamic response to orthostatic stress and vasodilator administration, and its increase has preceded changes in standard cardiovascular parameters. Complexity profiling has provided a detailed assessment of individual hemodynamic patterns of syncope. Different stimuli and complexity settings produce results of different clinical usability.