Cargando…
Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of surveillance testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) among staff members in skilled nursing facilities, evidence is limited regarding its relationship with outcomes among facility residents. METHODS: Using data obtained from 2020 to 2022, we perform...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Massachusetts Medical Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2210063 |
_version_ | 1785015109435785216 |
---|---|
author | McGarry, Brian E. Gandhi, Ashvin D. Barnett, Michael L. |
author_facet | McGarry, Brian E. Gandhi, Ashvin D. Barnett, Michael L. |
author_sort | McGarry, Brian E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of surveillance testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) among staff members in skilled nursing facilities, evidence is limited regarding its relationship with outcomes among facility residents. METHODS: Using data obtained from 2020 to 2022, we performed a retrospective cohort study of testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among staff members in 13,424 skilled nursing facilities during three pandemic periods: before vaccine approval, before the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant wave, and during the omicron wave. We assessed staff testing volumes during weeks without Covid-19 cases relative to other skilled nursing facilities in the same county, along with Covid-19 cases and deaths among residents during potential outbreaks (defined as the occurrence of a case after 2 weeks with no cases). We reported adjusted differences in outcomes between high-testing facilities (90th percentile of test volume) and low-testing facilities (10th percentile). The two primary outcomes were the weekly cumulative number of Covid-19 cases and related deaths among residents during potential outbreaks. RESULTS: During the overall study period, 519.7 cases of Covid-19 per 100 potential outbreaks were reported among residents of high-testing facilities as compared with 591.2 cases among residents of low-testing facilities (adjusted difference, −71.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], −91.3 to −51.6). During the same period, 42.7 deaths per 100 potential outbreaks occurred in high-testing facilities as compared with 49.8 deaths in low-testing facilities (adjusted difference, −7.1; 95% CI, −11.0 to −3.2). Before vaccine availability, high- and low-testing facilities had 759.9 cases and 1060.2 cases, respectively, per 100 potential outbreaks (adjusted difference, −300.3; 95% CI, −377.1 to −223.5), along with 125.2 and 166.8 deaths (adjusted difference, −41.6; 95% CI, −57.8 to −25.5). Before the omicron wave, the numbers of cases and deaths were similar in high- and low-testing facilities; during the omicron wave, high-testing facilities had fewer cases among residents, but deaths were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Greater surveillance testing of staff members at skilled nursing facilities was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in Covid-19 cases and deaths among residents, particularly before vaccine availability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10052223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Massachusetts Medical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100522232023-03-30 Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes McGarry, Brian E. Gandhi, Ashvin D. Barnett, Michael L. N Engl J Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of surveillance testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) among staff members in skilled nursing facilities, evidence is limited regarding its relationship with outcomes among facility residents. METHODS: Using data obtained from 2020 to 2022, we performed a retrospective cohort study of testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among staff members in 13,424 skilled nursing facilities during three pandemic periods: before vaccine approval, before the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant wave, and during the omicron wave. We assessed staff testing volumes during weeks without Covid-19 cases relative to other skilled nursing facilities in the same county, along with Covid-19 cases and deaths among residents during potential outbreaks (defined as the occurrence of a case after 2 weeks with no cases). We reported adjusted differences in outcomes between high-testing facilities (90th percentile of test volume) and low-testing facilities (10th percentile). The two primary outcomes were the weekly cumulative number of Covid-19 cases and related deaths among residents during potential outbreaks. RESULTS: During the overall study period, 519.7 cases of Covid-19 per 100 potential outbreaks were reported among residents of high-testing facilities as compared with 591.2 cases among residents of low-testing facilities (adjusted difference, −71.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], −91.3 to −51.6). During the same period, 42.7 deaths per 100 potential outbreaks occurred in high-testing facilities as compared with 49.8 deaths in low-testing facilities (adjusted difference, −7.1; 95% CI, −11.0 to −3.2). Before vaccine availability, high- and low-testing facilities had 759.9 cases and 1060.2 cases, respectively, per 100 potential outbreaks (adjusted difference, −300.3; 95% CI, −377.1 to −223.5), along with 125.2 and 166.8 deaths (adjusted difference, −41.6; 95% CI, −57.8 to −25.5). Before the omicron wave, the numbers of cases and deaths were similar in high- and low-testing facilities; during the omicron wave, high-testing facilities had fewer cases among residents, but deaths were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Greater surveillance testing of staff members at skilled nursing facilities was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in Covid-19 cases and deaths among residents, particularly before vaccine availability. Massachusetts Medical Society 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10052223/ /pubmed/36947467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2210063 Text en Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Article McGarry, Brian E. Gandhi, Ashvin D. Barnett, Michael L. Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes |
title | Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes |
title_full | Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes |
title_fullStr | Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes |
title_full_unstemmed | Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes |
title_short | Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes |
title_sort | covid-19 surveillance testing and resident outcomes in nursing homes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2210063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgarrybriane covid19surveillancetestingandresidentoutcomesinnursinghomes AT gandhiashvind covid19surveillancetestingandresidentoutcomesinnursinghomes AT barnettmichaell covid19surveillancetestingandresidentoutcomesinnursinghomes |