Cargando…
Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach
INTRODUCTION: Impactful, transdisciplinary scientific discoveries are created by teams of researchers spanning multiple disciplines, but collaboration across disciplines can be challenging. We examined how team dynamics and collaboration are related to successes and barriers faced by teams of resear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.9 |
_version_ | 1785015155772358656 |
---|---|
author | Slade, Emily Kern, Philip A. Kegebein, Robert L. Liu, Chang Thompson, Joel C. Kelly, Thomas H. King, Victoria L. DiPaola, Robert S. Surratt, Hilary L. |
author_facet | Slade, Emily Kern, Philip A. Kegebein, Robert L. Liu, Chang Thompson, Joel C. Kelly, Thomas H. King, Victoria L. DiPaola, Robert S. Surratt, Hilary L. |
author_sort | Slade, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Impactful, transdisciplinary scientific discoveries are created by teams of researchers spanning multiple disciplines, but collaboration across disciplines can be challenging. We examined how team dynamics and collaboration are related to successes and barriers faced by teams of researchers from multiple disciplines. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used to examine 12 research teams granted multidisciplinary pilot awards. Team members were surveyed to assess their team dynamics and individual views about transdisciplinary research. Forty-seven researchers (59.5%) responded, including two to eight members from each funded team. Associations were examined between collaborative dynamics and scholarly product outcomes, including manuscripts, grant proposals, and awarded grants. One member from each team was selected for an in-depth interview to contextualize and extend information about collaborative processes, successes, and barriers to performing transdisciplinary research. RESULTS: Quality of team interactions was positively associated with achievement of scholarly products (r = 0.64, p = 0.02). Satisfaction with team members (r = 0.38) and team collaboration scores (r = 0.43) also demonstrated positive associations with achievement of scholarly products, but these were not statistically significant. Qualitative results support these findings and add further insight into aspects of the collaborative process that were particularly important to foster success on multidisciplinary teams. Beyond scholarly metrics, additional successes from the multidisciplinary teams were identified through the qualitative portion of the study including career development and acceleration for early career researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Both the quantitative and qualitative study results indicate that effective collaboration is critical to multidisciplinary research team success. Development and/or promotion of team science-based trainings for researchers would promote these collaborative skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10052417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100524172023-03-30 Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach Slade, Emily Kern, Philip A. Kegebein, Robert L. Liu, Chang Thompson, Joel C. Kelly, Thomas H. King, Victoria L. DiPaola, Robert S. Surratt, Hilary L. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Impactful, transdisciplinary scientific discoveries are created by teams of researchers spanning multiple disciplines, but collaboration across disciplines can be challenging. We examined how team dynamics and collaboration are related to successes and barriers faced by teams of researchers from multiple disciplines. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used to examine 12 research teams granted multidisciplinary pilot awards. Team members were surveyed to assess their team dynamics and individual views about transdisciplinary research. Forty-seven researchers (59.5%) responded, including two to eight members from each funded team. Associations were examined between collaborative dynamics and scholarly product outcomes, including manuscripts, grant proposals, and awarded grants. One member from each team was selected for an in-depth interview to contextualize and extend information about collaborative processes, successes, and barriers to performing transdisciplinary research. RESULTS: Quality of team interactions was positively associated with achievement of scholarly products (r = 0.64, p = 0.02). Satisfaction with team members (r = 0.38) and team collaboration scores (r = 0.43) also demonstrated positive associations with achievement of scholarly products, but these were not statistically significant. Qualitative results support these findings and add further insight into aspects of the collaborative process that were particularly important to foster success on multidisciplinary teams. Beyond scholarly metrics, additional successes from the multidisciplinary teams were identified through the qualitative portion of the study including career development and acceleration for early career researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Both the quantitative and qualitative study results indicate that effective collaboration is critical to multidisciplinary research team success. Development and/or promotion of team science-based trainings for researchers would promote these collaborative skills. Cambridge University Press 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10052417/ /pubmed/37008617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Slade, Emily Kern, Philip A. Kegebein, Robert L. Liu, Chang Thompson, Joel C. Kelly, Thomas H. King, Victoria L. DiPaola, Robert S. Surratt, Hilary L. Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach |
title | Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach |
title_full | Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach |
title_fullStr | Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach |
title_short | Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach |
title_sort | collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: a mixed-methods approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37008617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sladeemily collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT kernphilipa collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT kegebeinrobertl collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT liuchang collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT thompsonjoelc collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT kellythomash collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT kingvictorial collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT dipaolaroberts collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach AT surratthilaryl collaborativeteamdynamicsandscholarlyoutcomesofmultidisciplinaryresearchteamsamixedmethodsapproach |