Cargando…

How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments

Foot self-care is an important element of caring for and promoting foot health. However, little is known about the validity and reliability of existing foot self-care instruments. The purpose of this review is to describe and analyze the focus, content, and psychometric evidence of existing instrume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sipilä, Jenni, Mäkelä, Anne-Marie, Hyytiä, Sasu, Stolt, Minna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983616
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030434
_version_ 1785015208545091584
author Sipilä, Jenni
Mäkelä, Anne-Marie
Hyytiä, Sasu
Stolt, Minna
author_facet Sipilä, Jenni
Mäkelä, Anne-Marie
Hyytiä, Sasu
Stolt, Minna
author_sort Sipilä, Jenni
collection PubMed
description Foot self-care is an important element of caring for and promoting foot health. However, little is known about the validity and reliability of existing foot self-care instruments. The purpose of this review is to describe and analyze the focus, content, and psychometric evidence of existing instruments for measuring foot self-care. A methodological review of three international scientific databases—Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Embase—was conducted in May 2022. The search produced 3520 hits, of which 53 studies were included in the final analysis based on a two-phase selection process. A total of 31 instruments were identified, of which six were observed to have been used more than once. Subsequently, the methodological quality of these six instruments was evaluated. It is noted that although a considerable variety of instruments are used in measuring foot self-care, only a small proportion are used consistently. In general, the psychometric testing instruments seem to primarily focus on analyzing content validity and homogeneity. In the future, comprehensive testing of instrument psychometrics could enhance the cumulative evidence of the methodological quality of these instruments. Furthermore, researchers and clinicians can use the information in this review to make informed choices when selecting an instrument for their purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10052648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100526482023-03-30 How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments Sipilä, Jenni Mäkelä, Anne-Marie Hyytiä, Sasu Stolt, Minna J Pers Med Review Foot self-care is an important element of caring for and promoting foot health. However, little is known about the validity and reliability of existing foot self-care instruments. The purpose of this review is to describe and analyze the focus, content, and psychometric evidence of existing instruments for measuring foot self-care. A methodological review of three international scientific databases—Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Embase—was conducted in May 2022. The search produced 3520 hits, of which 53 studies were included in the final analysis based on a two-phase selection process. A total of 31 instruments were identified, of which six were observed to have been used more than once. Subsequently, the methodological quality of these six instruments was evaluated. It is noted that although a considerable variety of instruments are used in measuring foot self-care, only a small proportion are used consistently. In general, the psychometric testing instruments seem to primarily focus on analyzing content validity and homogeneity. In the future, comprehensive testing of instrument psychometrics could enhance the cumulative evidence of the methodological quality of these instruments. Furthermore, researchers and clinicians can use the information in this review to make informed choices when selecting an instrument for their purposes. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10052648/ /pubmed/36983616 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030434 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sipilä, Jenni
Mäkelä, Anne-Marie
Hyytiä, Sasu
Stolt, Minna
How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments
title How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments
title_full How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments
title_fullStr How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments
title_full_unstemmed How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments
title_short How to Measure Foot Self-Care? A Methodological Review of Instruments
title_sort how to measure foot self-care? a methodological review of instruments
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983616
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030434
work_keys_str_mv AT sipilajenni howtomeasurefootselfcareamethodologicalreviewofinstruments
AT makelaannemarie howtomeasurefootselfcareamethodologicalreviewofinstruments
AT hyytiasasu howtomeasurefootselfcareamethodologicalreviewofinstruments
AT stoltminna howtomeasurefootselfcareamethodologicalreviewofinstruments