Cargando…
Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6 |
_version_ | 1785015249969086464 |
---|---|
author | Dreger, Nici Markus Stapelmann, Dominik Rebacz, Patrick Roth, Stephan Brandt, Alexander Sascha von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl Degener, Stephan |
author_facet | Dreger, Nici Markus Stapelmann, Dominik Rebacz, Patrick Roth, Stephan Brandt, Alexander Sascha von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl Degener, Stephan |
author_sort | Dreger, Nici Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) and 162 males (65%)) between 2007 and 2015. Postoperatively, RPP was measured using a central venous pressure manometer in cmH(2)O. The primary endpoint was to assess RPP depending on the patency of the ureter and the nephrostomy tube removal. Secondary, the upper limit of normal RPP of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O was assessed as an indicator of an unobstructed patency. RESULTS: The median procedure duration was 141 min (112–171.5) with a stone free rate of 82% (n = 202). RPP was significantly higher in patients with obstructive nephrostogram with 25.0 mmH(2)O (21.0–32.0) versus 20.0 mmH(2)O (16.0–24.0; p < 0.001). The pressure was lower in successful nephrostomy removal with 18 cmH(2)O (15–21) versus 23 cmH(2)O (20–29) in the leakage group (p < 0.001). The analysis of a cut-off of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O showed a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI [60.7%; 88.9%]) and a specificity of 61.5% (95% CI [54.6%; 68.2%]). The negative predictive value was 93.4% (95% CI: [87.9%; 97.0%]) and the positive predictive value 27.3% (95% CI [19.2%; 36.6%]). The accuracy of the model showed an AUC = 0.795 (95% CI [0.668; 0.862]). CONCLUSION: The hydrostatic RPP seems to allow a bedside evaluation of ureteral patency after PCNL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10052835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100528352023-03-30 Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy Dreger, Nici Markus Stapelmann, Dominik Rebacz, Patrick Roth, Stephan Brandt, Alexander Sascha von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl Degener, Stephan BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) and 162 males (65%)) between 2007 and 2015. Postoperatively, RPP was measured using a central venous pressure manometer in cmH(2)O. The primary endpoint was to assess RPP depending on the patency of the ureter and the nephrostomy tube removal. Secondary, the upper limit of normal RPP of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O was assessed as an indicator of an unobstructed patency. RESULTS: The median procedure duration was 141 min (112–171.5) with a stone free rate of 82% (n = 202). RPP was significantly higher in patients with obstructive nephrostogram with 25.0 mmH(2)O (21.0–32.0) versus 20.0 mmH(2)O (16.0–24.0; p < 0.001). The pressure was lower in successful nephrostomy removal with 18 cmH(2)O (15–21) versus 23 cmH(2)O (20–29) in the leakage group (p < 0.001). The analysis of a cut-off of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O showed a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI [60.7%; 88.9%]) and a specificity of 61.5% (95% CI [54.6%; 68.2%]). The negative predictive value was 93.4% (95% CI: [87.9%; 97.0%]) and the positive predictive value 27.3% (95% CI [19.2%; 36.6%]). The accuracy of the model showed an AUC = 0.795 (95% CI [0.668; 0.862]). CONCLUSION: The hydrostatic RPP seems to allow a bedside evaluation of ureteral patency after PCNL. BioMed Central 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10052835/ /pubmed/36978025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dreger, Nici Markus Stapelmann, Dominik Rebacz, Patrick Roth, Stephan Brandt, Alexander Sascha von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl Degener, Stephan Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title | Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_full | Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_fullStr | Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_short | Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_sort | hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dregernicimarkus hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT stapelmanndominik hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT rebaczpatrick hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT rothstephan hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT brandtalexandersascha hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT vonrundstedtfriedrichcarl hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT degenerstephan hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy |