Cargando…

Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dreger, Nici Markus, Stapelmann, Dominik, Rebacz, Patrick, Roth, Stephan, Brandt, Alexander Sascha, von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl, Degener, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6
_version_ 1785015249969086464
author Dreger, Nici Markus
Stapelmann, Dominik
Rebacz, Patrick
Roth, Stephan
Brandt, Alexander Sascha
von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl
Degener, Stephan
author_facet Dreger, Nici Markus
Stapelmann, Dominik
Rebacz, Patrick
Roth, Stephan
Brandt, Alexander Sascha
von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl
Degener, Stephan
author_sort Dreger, Nici Markus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) and 162 males (65%)) between 2007 and 2015. Postoperatively, RPP was measured using a central venous pressure manometer in cmH(2)O. The primary endpoint was to assess RPP depending on the patency of the ureter and the nephrostomy tube removal. Secondary, the upper limit of normal RPP of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O was assessed as an indicator of an unobstructed patency. RESULTS: The median procedure duration was 141 min (112–171.5) with a stone free rate of 82% (n = 202). RPP was significantly higher in patients with obstructive nephrostogram with 25.0 mmH(2)O (21.0–32.0) versus 20.0 mmH(2)O (16.0–24.0; p < 0.001). The pressure was lower in successful nephrostomy removal with 18 cmH(2)O (15–21) versus 23 cmH(2)O (20–29) in the leakage group (p < 0.001). The analysis of a cut-off of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O showed a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI [60.7%; 88.9%]) and a specificity of 61.5% (95% CI [54.6%; 68.2%]). The negative predictive value was 93.4% (95% CI: [87.9%; 97.0%]) and the positive predictive value 27.3% (95% CI [19.2%; 36.6%]). The accuracy of the model showed an AUC = 0.795 (95% CI [0.668; 0.862]). CONCLUSION: The hydrostatic RPP seems to allow a bedside evaluation of ureteral patency after PCNL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10052835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100528352023-03-30 Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy Dreger, Nici Markus Stapelmann, Dominik Rebacz, Patrick Roth, Stephan Brandt, Alexander Sascha von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl Degener, Stephan BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) and 162 males (65%)) between 2007 and 2015. Postoperatively, RPP was measured using a central venous pressure manometer in cmH(2)O. The primary endpoint was to assess RPP depending on the patency of the ureter and the nephrostomy tube removal. Secondary, the upper limit of normal RPP of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O was assessed as an indicator of an unobstructed patency. RESULTS: The median procedure duration was 141 min (112–171.5) with a stone free rate of 82% (n = 202). RPP was significantly higher in patients with obstructive nephrostogram with 25.0 mmH(2)O (21.0–32.0) versus 20.0 mmH(2)O (16.0–24.0; p < 0.001). The pressure was lower in successful nephrostomy removal with 18 cmH(2)O (15–21) versus 23 cmH(2)O (20–29) in the leakage group (p < 0.001). The analysis of a cut-off of [Formula: see text] 20 cmH(2)O showed a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI [60.7%; 88.9%]) and a specificity of 61.5% (95% CI [54.6%; 68.2%]). The negative predictive value was 93.4% (95% CI: [87.9%; 97.0%]) and the positive predictive value 27.3% (95% CI [19.2%; 36.6%]). The accuracy of the model showed an AUC = 0.795 (95% CI [0.668; 0.862]). CONCLUSION: The hydrostatic RPP seems to allow a bedside evaluation of ureteral patency after PCNL. BioMed Central 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10052835/ /pubmed/36978025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dreger, Nici Markus
Stapelmann, Dominik
Rebacz, Patrick
Roth, Stephan
Brandt, Alexander Sascha
von Rundstedt, Friedrich-Carl
Degener, Stephan
Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_short Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dregernicimarkus hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT stapelmanndominik hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT rebaczpatrick hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT rothstephan hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT brandtalexandersascha hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT vonrundstedtfriedrichcarl hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT degenerstephan hydrostaticpressureoftherenalpelvisasaradiationfreealternativetofluoroscopicnephrostogramfollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy