Cargando…
The normality assumption on between-study random effects was questionable in a considerable number of Cochrane meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Studies included in a meta-analysis are often heterogeneous. The traditional random-effects models assume their true effects to follow a normal distribution, while it is unclear if this critical assumption is practical. Violations of this between-study normality assumption could lead to...
Autores principales: | Liu, Ziyu, Al Amer, Fahad M., Xiao, Mengli, Xu, Chang, Furuya-Kanamori, Luis, Hong, Hwanhee, Siegel, Lianne, Lin, Lifeng |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02823-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Questioning Assumptions
por: Poodry, Clifton A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
An investigation of the constancy of effect in Cochrane systematic reviews in context with the assumptions for noninferiority trials
por: Duro, Enass M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Questioning central assumptions of the ICAP framework
por: Thurn, Christian M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Questioning the foundations of physics: which of our fundamental assumptions are wrong?
por: Aguirre, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Questionable assumptions mar modelling of Kenya home‐based testing campaigns
por: Granich, Reuben, et al.
Publicado: (2019)