Cargando…

Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods

AIMS: Head‐to‐head comparisons among SGLT2 inhibitors treatments in established heart failure remain absent. We conducted a systematic review of dedicated heart failure trials to assess indirectly the composite outcomes and individual clinical endpoints among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments. METHODS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hai‐Bin, Yang, Yao‐Lin, Meng, Rong‐Sen, Liu, Xue‐Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36702979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14297
_version_ 1785015370962173952
author Chen, Hai‐Bin
Yang, Yao‐Lin
Meng, Rong‐Sen
Liu, Xue‐Wei
author_facet Chen, Hai‐Bin
Yang, Yao‐Lin
Meng, Rong‐Sen
Liu, Xue‐Wei
author_sort Chen, Hai‐Bin
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Head‐to‐head comparisons among SGLT2 inhibitors treatments in established heart failure remain absent. We conducted a systematic review of dedicated heart failure trials to assess indirectly the composite outcomes and individual clinical endpoints among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with established heart failure. A Bayesian approach to network meta‐analysis was applied. Five trials including four treatment strategies were included in this study. The composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66–1.55), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.91–2.65), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.90–2.69). All‐cause mortality showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.711–1.18), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.68–1.59), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74–1.73). Cardiovascular death showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71–1.23), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.61–1.55), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64–1.66). Hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64–1.97), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.74–3.15), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.68–2.78). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with established heart failure, there was no significant difference of the major efficacy outcomes among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments; however, sotagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, and dapagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10053258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100532582023-03-30 Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods Chen, Hai‐Bin Yang, Yao‐Lin Meng, Rong‐Sen Liu, Xue‐Wei ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Head‐to‐head comparisons among SGLT2 inhibitors treatments in established heart failure remain absent. We conducted a systematic review of dedicated heart failure trials to assess indirectly the composite outcomes and individual clinical endpoints among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with established heart failure. A Bayesian approach to network meta‐analysis was applied. Five trials including four treatment strategies were included in this study. The composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66–1.55), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.91–2.65), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.90–2.69). All‐cause mortality showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.711–1.18), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.68–1.59), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74–1.73). Cardiovascular death showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71–1.23), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.61–1.55), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64–1.66). Hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64–1.97), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.74–3.15), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.68–2.78). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with established heart failure, there was no significant difference of the major efficacy outcomes among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments; however, sotagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, and dapagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10053258/ /pubmed/36702979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14297 Text en © 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chen, Hai‐Bin
Yang, Yao‐Lin
Meng, Rong‐Sen
Liu, Xue‐Wei
Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods
title Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods
title_full Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods
title_fullStr Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods
title_full_unstemmed Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods
title_short Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods
title_sort indirect comparison of sglt2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on bayesian methods
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36702979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14297
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhaibin indirectcomparisonofsglt2inhibitorsinpatientswithestablishedheartfailureevidencebasedonbayesianmethods
AT yangyaolin indirectcomparisonofsglt2inhibitorsinpatientswithestablishedheartfailureevidencebasedonbayesianmethods
AT mengrongsen indirectcomparisonofsglt2inhibitorsinpatientswithestablishedheartfailureevidencebasedonbayesianmethods
AT liuxuewei indirectcomparisonofsglt2inhibitorsinpatientswithestablishedheartfailureevidencebasedonbayesianmethods