Cargando…

Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study

Background: The present pilot study aimed to assess clinical and radiographic efficiencies of bovine bone substitute (BBS) merged with hyaluronic acid (HA) in peri-implantits reconstructive surgery. Methods: Peri-implantitis (diagnosed 6.03 ± 1.61 years of implant loading) bone defects were randomly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rakašević, Dragana, Šćepanović, Miodrag, Mijailović, Iva, Mišić, Tijana, Janjić, Bojan, Soldatović, Ivan, Marković, Aleksa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14030149
_version_ 1785015376989388800
author Rakašević, Dragana
Šćepanović, Miodrag
Mijailović, Iva
Mišić, Tijana
Janjić, Bojan
Soldatović, Ivan
Marković, Aleksa
author_facet Rakašević, Dragana
Šćepanović, Miodrag
Mijailović, Iva
Mišić, Tijana
Janjić, Bojan
Soldatović, Ivan
Marković, Aleksa
author_sort Rakašević, Dragana
collection PubMed
description Background: The present pilot study aimed to assess clinical and radiographic efficiencies of bovine bone substitute (BBS) merged with hyaluronic acid (HA) in peri-implantits reconstructive surgery. Methods: Peri-implantitis (diagnosed 6.03 ± 1.61 years of implant loading) bone defects were randomly treated either with BBS plus HA (test group) or BBS alone (control group). Clinical parameters including peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), implant stability (ISQ), and radiographic changes in vertical and horizontal marginal bone (MB) levels were assessed at six months postoperatively. New temporary and permanent screw-retained crowns were made at two weeks and three months postoperatively. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Results: In both groups, 75% of patients and 83% of implants achieved treatment success after six months (no BOP, PPD <5 mm, and no further MB loss). Clinical outcomes improved over time within groups; however, without significant difference between them. ISQ value obtained significant increases in the test compared to the control group at six months postoperatively (p < 0.05). The vertical MB gain was significantly greater in the test group compared to the control (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Short-term outcomes suggested that BBS merged with HA could improve clinical and radiographic outcomes in peri-implantitis reconstructive therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10053283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100532832023-03-30 Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study Rakašević, Dragana Šćepanović, Miodrag Mijailović, Iva Mišić, Tijana Janjić, Bojan Soldatović, Ivan Marković, Aleksa J Funct Biomater Article Background: The present pilot study aimed to assess clinical and radiographic efficiencies of bovine bone substitute (BBS) merged with hyaluronic acid (HA) in peri-implantits reconstructive surgery. Methods: Peri-implantitis (diagnosed 6.03 ± 1.61 years of implant loading) bone defects were randomly treated either with BBS plus HA (test group) or BBS alone (control group). Clinical parameters including peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), implant stability (ISQ), and radiographic changes in vertical and horizontal marginal bone (MB) levels were assessed at six months postoperatively. New temporary and permanent screw-retained crowns were made at two weeks and three months postoperatively. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Results: In both groups, 75% of patients and 83% of implants achieved treatment success after six months (no BOP, PPD <5 mm, and no further MB loss). Clinical outcomes improved over time within groups; however, without significant difference between them. ISQ value obtained significant increases in the test compared to the control group at six months postoperatively (p < 0.05). The vertical MB gain was significantly greater in the test group compared to the control (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Short-term outcomes suggested that BBS merged with HA could improve clinical and radiographic outcomes in peri-implantitis reconstructive therapy. MDPI 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10053283/ /pubmed/36976073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14030149 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rakašević, Dragana
Šćepanović, Miodrag
Mijailović, Iva
Mišić, Tijana
Janjić, Bojan
Soldatović, Ivan
Marković, Aleksa
Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study
title Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study
title_full Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study
title_fullStr Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study
title_short Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study
title_sort reconstructive peri-implantitis therapy by using bovine bone substitute with or without hyaluronic acid: a randomized clinical controlled pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14030149
work_keys_str_mv AT rakasevicdragana reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy
AT scepanovicmiodrag reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy
AT mijailoviciva reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy
AT misictijana reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy
AT janjicbojan reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy
AT soldatovicivan reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy
AT markovicaleksa reconstructiveperiimplantitistherapybyusingbovinebonesubstitutewithorwithouthyaluronicacidarandomizedclinicalcontrolledpilotstudy