Cargando…

Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of dynamic changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) for cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in an all‐comer heart failure (HF) population with reduced EF (HFrEF, EF < 40%). We sought to identify independent factors related to improveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Dan, Hu, Kai, Schregelmann, Lena, Hammel, Clara, Lengenfelder, Björn Daniel, Ertl, Georg, Frantz, Stefan, Nordbeck, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14303
_version_ 1785015380905820160
author Liu, Dan
Hu, Kai
Schregelmann, Lena
Hammel, Clara
Lengenfelder, Björn Daniel
Ertl, Georg
Frantz, Stefan
Nordbeck, Peter
author_facet Liu, Dan
Hu, Kai
Schregelmann, Lena
Hammel, Clara
Lengenfelder, Björn Daniel
Ertl, Georg
Frantz, Stefan
Nordbeck, Peter
author_sort Liu, Dan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of dynamic changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) for cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in an all‐comer heart failure (HF) population with reduced EF (HFrEF, EF < 40%). We sought to identify independent factors related to improvement in EF and to identify risk factors for increased risk of CV events in the subgroups of improved EF (iEF) and non‐improved EF (niEF), respecively. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective sub‐analysis from the REDEAL HF trial, which included consecutive patients with chronic HF who were hospitalized from July 2009 to December 2017. Baseline and follow‐up echocardiography data (interval ≥12 months) of 573 consecutive patients with HFrEF were analysed. iEF was defined as absolute improvement in EF ≥ 10% and follow‐up EF over 40%. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, CV hospitalization, or appropriate implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular arrhythmia. EF improved in 37.2% of patients with HFrEF during follow‐up (median period of 17 months). iEF was independently associated with shorter HF duration (>4 vs. ≤4 years, odd ratio [OR] = 0.477, 95% CI 0.305–0.745), no coronary artery disease (CAD vs. no CAD, OR = 0.583, 95% CI 0.396–0.858), and no ICD implantation (ICD vs. no ICD, OR = 0.341, 95% CI 0.228–0.511). Compared with niEF, iEF was significantly and independently associated with lower all‐cause mortality (22.1% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.019; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.674, 95% CI 0.469–0.968), lower CV mortality (8.9% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.015; HR = 0.539, 95% CI 0.317–0.916), and lower CV events risk (27.2% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.001; HR 0.519, 95% CI 0.381–0.708), after adjustment for age, sex, duration of HF, and other clinical risk factors. Hypertension (HR = 2.452, P = 0.032) and elevated N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP >1153 pg/mL, HR = 4.372, P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for CV events in the iEF subgroup. ICD implantation (HR = 1.533, P = 0.011), elevated NT‐proBNP (HR = 1.626, P = 0.018), increased left atrial volume index (HR = 1.461, P = 0.021), reduced lateral mitral annular plane systolic excursion (HR = 1.478, P = 0.025), and reduced tricuspid plane systolic excursion (HR = 1.491, P = 0.039) were identified as risk factors for CV events in the niEF subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in EF is independently related to the longer survival and lower CV related mortality and hospitalization rate of HFrEF. Elevated baseline NT‐proBNP is identified as the strongest prognostic factor associated with increased CV events risk in HFrEF patients both with and without improved EF, regardless of age, sex, duration of HF, and other clinical risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10053299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100532992023-03-30 Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction Liu, Dan Hu, Kai Schregelmann, Lena Hammel, Clara Lengenfelder, Björn Daniel Ertl, Georg Frantz, Stefan Nordbeck, Peter ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of dynamic changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) for cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in an all‐comer heart failure (HF) population with reduced EF (HFrEF, EF < 40%). We sought to identify independent factors related to improvement in EF and to identify risk factors for increased risk of CV events in the subgroups of improved EF (iEF) and non‐improved EF (niEF), respecively. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective sub‐analysis from the REDEAL HF trial, which included consecutive patients with chronic HF who were hospitalized from July 2009 to December 2017. Baseline and follow‐up echocardiography data (interval ≥12 months) of 573 consecutive patients with HFrEF were analysed. iEF was defined as absolute improvement in EF ≥ 10% and follow‐up EF over 40%. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, CV hospitalization, or appropriate implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular arrhythmia. EF improved in 37.2% of patients with HFrEF during follow‐up (median period of 17 months). iEF was independently associated with shorter HF duration (>4 vs. ≤4 years, odd ratio [OR] = 0.477, 95% CI 0.305–0.745), no coronary artery disease (CAD vs. no CAD, OR = 0.583, 95% CI 0.396–0.858), and no ICD implantation (ICD vs. no ICD, OR = 0.341, 95% CI 0.228–0.511). Compared with niEF, iEF was significantly and independently associated with lower all‐cause mortality (22.1% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.019; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.674, 95% CI 0.469–0.968), lower CV mortality (8.9% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.015; HR = 0.539, 95% CI 0.317–0.916), and lower CV events risk (27.2% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.001; HR 0.519, 95% CI 0.381–0.708), after adjustment for age, sex, duration of HF, and other clinical risk factors. Hypertension (HR = 2.452, P = 0.032) and elevated N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP >1153 pg/mL, HR = 4.372, P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for CV events in the iEF subgroup. ICD implantation (HR = 1.533, P = 0.011), elevated NT‐proBNP (HR = 1.626, P = 0.018), increased left atrial volume index (HR = 1.461, P = 0.021), reduced lateral mitral annular plane systolic excursion (HR = 1.478, P = 0.025), and reduced tricuspid plane systolic excursion (HR = 1.491, P = 0.039) were identified as risk factors for CV events in the niEF subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in EF is independently related to the longer survival and lower CV related mortality and hospitalization rate of HFrEF. Elevated baseline NT‐proBNP is identified as the strongest prognostic factor associated with increased CV events risk in HFrEF patients both with and without improved EF, regardless of age, sex, duration of HF, and other clinical risk factors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10053299/ /pubmed/36732921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14303 Text en © 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Liu, Dan
Hu, Kai
Schregelmann, Lena
Hammel, Clara
Lengenfelder, Björn Daniel
Ertl, Georg
Frantz, Stefan
Nordbeck, Peter
Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
title Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
title_full Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
title_fullStr Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
title_short Determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
title_sort determinants of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14303
work_keys_str_mv AT liudan determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT hukai determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT schregelmannlena determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT hammelclara determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT lengenfelderbjorndaniel determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT ertlgeorg determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT frantzstefan determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction
AT nordbeckpeter determinantsofejectionfractionimprovementinheartfailurepatientswithreducedejectionfraction