Cargando…

Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling

Right ventricular (RV) function and its adaptation to increased afterload [RV–pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling] are crucial in various types of pulmonary hypertension, determining symptomatology and outcome. In the course of disease progression and increasing afterload, the right ventricle undergoes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rako, Zvonimir A., Kremer, Nils, Yogeswaran, Athiththan, Richter, Manuel J., Tello, Khodr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14233
_version_ 1785015396004265984
author Rako, Zvonimir A.
Kremer, Nils
Yogeswaran, Athiththan
Richter, Manuel J.
Tello, Khodr
author_facet Rako, Zvonimir A.
Kremer, Nils
Yogeswaran, Athiththan
Richter, Manuel J.
Tello, Khodr
author_sort Rako, Zvonimir A.
collection PubMed
description Right ventricular (RV) function and its adaptation to increased afterload [RV–pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling] are crucial in various types of pulmonary hypertension, determining symptomatology and outcome. In the course of disease progression and increasing afterload, the right ventricle undergoes adaptive remodelling to maintain right‐sided cardiac output by increasing contractility. Exhaustion of compensatory RV remodelling (RV–PA uncoupling) finally leads to maladaptation and increase of cardiac volumes, resulting in heart failure. The gold‐standard measurement of RV–PA coupling is the ratio of contractility [end‐systolic elastance (Ees)] to afterload [arterial elastance (Ea)] derived from RV pressure–volume loops obtained by conductance catheterization. The optimal Ees/Ea ratio is between 1.5 and 2.0. RV–PA coupling in pulmonary hypertension has considerable reserve; the Ees/Ea threshold at which uncoupling occurs is estimated to be ~0.7. As RV conductance catheterization is invasive, complex, and not widely available, multiple non‐invasive echocardiographic surrogates for Ees/Ea have been investigated. One of the first described and best validated surrogates is the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP), which has shown prognostic relevance in left‐sided heart failure and precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Other RV–PA coupling surrogates have been formed by replacing TAPSE with different echocardiographic measures of RV contractility, such as peak systolic tissue velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S′), RV fractional area change, speckle tracking‐based RV free wall longitudinal strain and global longitudinal strain, and three‐dimensional RV ejection fraction. PASP‐independent surrogates have also been studied, including the ratios S′/RV end‐systolic area index, RV area change/RV end‐systolic area, and stroke volume/end‐systolic volume. Limitations of these non‐invasive surrogates include the influence of severe tricuspid regurgitation (which can cause distortion of longitudinal measurements and underestimation of PASP) and the angle dependence of TAPSE and PASP. Detection of early RV remodelling may require isolated analysis of single components of RV shortening along the radial and anteroposterior axes as well as the longitudinal axis. Multiple non‐invasive methods may need to be applied depending on the level of RV dysfunction. This review explains the mechanisms of RV (mal)adaptation to its load, describes the invasive assessment of RV–PA coupling, and provides an overview of studies of non‐invasive surrogate parameters, highlighting recently published works in this field. Further large‐scale prospective studies including gold‐standard validation are needed, as most studies to date had a retrospective, single‐centre design with a small number of participants, and validation against gold‐standard Ees/Ea was rarely performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10053363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100533632023-03-30 Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling Rako, Zvonimir A. Kremer, Nils Yogeswaran, Athiththan Richter, Manuel J. Tello, Khodr ESC Heart Fail Reviews Right ventricular (RV) function and its adaptation to increased afterload [RV–pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling] are crucial in various types of pulmonary hypertension, determining symptomatology and outcome. In the course of disease progression and increasing afterload, the right ventricle undergoes adaptive remodelling to maintain right‐sided cardiac output by increasing contractility. Exhaustion of compensatory RV remodelling (RV–PA uncoupling) finally leads to maladaptation and increase of cardiac volumes, resulting in heart failure. The gold‐standard measurement of RV–PA coupling is the ratio of contractility [end‐systolic elastance (Ees)] to afterload [arterial elastance (Ea)] derived from RV pressure–volume loops obtained by conductance catheterization. The optimal Ees/Ea ratio is between 1.5 and 2.0. RV–PA coupling in pulmonary hypertension has considerable reserve; the Ees/Ea threshold at which uncoupling occurs is estimated to be ~0.7. As RV conductance catheterization is invasive, complex, and not widely available, multiple non‐invasive echocardiographic surrogates for Ees/Ea have been investigated. One of the first described and best validated surrogates is the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP), which has shown prognostic relevance in left‐sided heart failure and precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Other RV–PA coupling surrogates have been formed by replacing TAPSE with different echocardiographic measures of RV contractility, such as peak systolic tissue velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S′), RV fractional area change, speckle tracking‐based RV free wall longitudinal strain and global longitudinal strain, and three‐dimensional RV ejection fraction. PASP‐independent surrogates have also been studied, including the ratios S′/RV end‐systolic area index, RV area change/RV end‐systolic area, and stroke volume/end‐systolic volume. Limitations of these non‐invasive surrogates include the influence of severe tricuspid regurgitation (which can cause distortion of longitudinal measurements and underestimation of PASP) and the angle dependence of TAPSE and PASP. Detection of early RV remodelling may require isolated analysis of single components of RV shortening along the radial and anteroposterior axes as well as the longitudinal axis. Multiple non‐invasive methods may need to be applied depending on the level of RV dysfunction. This review explains the mechanisms of RV (mal)adaptation to its load, describes the invasive assessment of RV–PA coupling, and provides an overview of studies of non‐invasive surrogate parameters, highlighting recently published works in this field. Further large‐scale prospective studies including gold‐standard validation are needed, as most studies to date had a retrospective, single‐centre design with a small number of participants, and validation against gold‐standard Ees/Ea was rarely performed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10053363/ /pubmed/36419369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14233 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Rako, Zvonimir A.
Kremer, Nils
Yogeswaran, Athiththan
Richter, Manuel J.
Tello, Khodr
Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
title Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
title_full Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
title_fullStr Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
title_short Adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
title_sort adaptive versus maladaptive right ventricular remodelling
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14233
work_keys_str_mv AT rakozvonimira adaptiveversusmaladaptiverightventricularremodelling
AT kremernils adaptiveversusmaladaptiverightventricularremodelling
AT yogeswaranathiththan adaptiveversusmaladaptiverightventricularremodelling
AT richtermanuelj adaptiveversusmaladaptiverightventricularremodelling
AT tellokhodr adaptiveversusmaladaptiverightventricularremodelling