Cargando…

Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study

(1) Background: In recent years, 3D printing has become a highly popular tool for manufacturing in various fields such as aviation, automobiles, plastics, and even medicine, including dentistry. Three-dimensional printing allows dentists to create high-precision models of teeth and jaw structure, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna, Wezgowiec, Joanna, Mikulewicz, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062237
_version_ 1785015540422541312
author Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
Wezgowiec, Joanna
Mikulewicz, Marcin
author_facet Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
Wezgowiec, Joanna
Mikulewicz, Marcin
author_sort Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: In recent years, 3D printing has become a highly popular tool for manufacturing in various fields such as aviation, automobiles, plastics, and even medicine, including dentistry. Three-dimensional printing allows dentists to create high-precision models of teeth and jaw structure, and enables them to develop customized tools for patients’ treatment. The range of resins used in dentistry is quite large, and this branch is developing rapidly; hence, studies comparing different resins are required. The present study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of two chosen resins used in dentistry. (2) Materials and methods: Ten specimens each of two types of 3D-printable resins (BioMed Amber and IBT, developed by Formlabs) were prepared. The samples were printed on a Formlabs Form 2 3D printer according to ISO standards. Samples for the compression test were rectangular in shape (10 ± 0.2 mm × 10 ± 0.2 mm × 4 ± 0.2 mm), while the samples used for the tensile test were dumbbell shaped (75 mm long, with 10 mm end width and 2 mm thickness). Tensile and compression tests of both materials were performed in accordance with the appropriate ISO standards. (3) Results: The BioMed Amber resin was more resistant to compression and tensile forces, thus implying that the resin could withstand higher stress during stretching, pulling, or pushing. The IBT resin was less resistant to such loads, and failure of this material occurred at lower forces than those for Biomed Amber. An ANOVA test confirmed that the observed differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Based on the properties of both materials, the IBT resin could be better used as a tray for placing orthodontic brackets through an indirect bonding technique, while the BioMed Amber resin would be more useful as a surgical guide for placing dental implants and mini-implants. Further potential fields of application of the resins should be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10053969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100539692023-03-30 Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna Wezgowiec, Joanna Mikulewicz, Marcin Materials (Basel) Article (1) Background: In recent years, 3D printing has become a highly popular tool for manufacturing in various fields such as aviation, automobiles, plastics, and even medicine, including dentistry. Three-dimensional printing allows dentists to create high-precision models of teeth and jaw structure, and enables them to develop customized tools for patients’ treatment. The range of resins used in dentistry is quite large, and this branch is developing rapidly; hence, studies comparing different resins are required. The present study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of two chosen resins used in dentistry. (2) Materials and methods: Ten specimens each of two types of 3D-printable resins (BioMed Amber and IBT, developed by Formlabs) were prepared. The samples were printed on a Formlabs Form 2 3D printer according to ISO standards. Samples for the compression test were rectangular in shape (10 ± 0.2 mm × 10 ± 0.2 mm × 4 ± 0.2 mm), while the samples used for the tensile test were dumbbell shaped (75 mm long, with 10 mm end width and 2 mm thickness). Tensile and compression tests of both materials were performed in accordance with the appropriate ISO standards. (3) Results: The BioMed Amber resin was more resistant to compression and tensile forces, thus implying that the resin could withstand higher stress during stretching, pulling, or pushing. The IBT resin was less resistant to such loads, and failure of this material occurred at lower forces than those for Biomed Amber. An ANOVA test confirmed that the observed differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Based on the properties of both materials, the IBT resin could be better used as a tray for placing orthodontic brackets through an indirect bonding technique, while the BioMed Amber resin would be more useful as a surgical guide for placing dental implants and mini-implants. Further potential fields of application of the resins should be investigated. MDPI 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10053969/ /pubmed/36984116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062237 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paradowska-Stolarz, Anna
Wezgowiec, Joanna
Mikulewicz, Marcin
Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study
title Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of two chosen 3d printing resins designed for orthodontic use: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36984116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16062237
work_keys_str_mv AT paradowskastolarzanna comparisonoftwochosen3dprintingresinsdesignedfororthodonticuseaninvitrostudy
AT wezgowiecjoanna comparisonoftwochosen3dprintingresinsdesignedfororthodonticuseaninvitrostudy
AT mikulewiczmarcin comparisonoftwochosen3dprintingresinsdesignedfororthodonticuseaninvitrostudy