Cargando…

One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials

Cardiac arrest, one of the leading causes of death, accounts for numerous clinical studies published each year. This review summarizes the findings of all the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on cardiac arrest published in the year 2022. The RCTs are presented according to the following c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penna, Alessio, Magliocca, Aurora, Merigo, Giulia, Stirparo, Giuseppe, Silvestri, Ivan, Fumagalli, Francesca, Ristagno, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10054058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062235
_version_ 1785015561391964160
author Penna, Alessio
Magliocca, Aurora
Merigo, Giulia
Stirparo, Giuseppe
Silvestri, Ivan
Fumagalli, Francesca
Ristagno, Giuseppe
author_facet Penna, Alessio
Magliocca, Aurora
Merigo, Giulia
Stirparo, Giuseppe
Silvestri, Ivan
Fumagalli, Francesca
Ristagno, Giuseppe
author_sort Penna, Alessio
collection PubMed
description Cardiac arrest, one of the leading causes of death, accounts for numerous clinical studies published each year. This review summarizes the findings of all the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on cardiac arrest published in the year 2022. The RCTs are presented according to the following categories: out-of- and in-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA, IHCA) and post-cardiac arrest care. Interestingly, more than 80% of the RCTs encompassed advanced life support and post-cardiac arrest care, while no studies focused on the treatment of IHCA, except for one that, however, explored the temperature control after resuscitation in this population. Surprisingly, 9 out of 11 RCTs led to neutral results demonstrating equivalency between the newly tested interventions compared to current practice. One trial was negative, showing that oxygen titration in the immediate pre-hospital post-resuscitation period decreased survival compared to a more liberal approach. One RCT was positive and introduced new defibrillation strategies for refractory cardiac arrest. Overall, data from the 2022 RCTs discussed here provide a solid basis to generate new hypotheses to be tested in future clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10054058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100540582023-03-30 One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials Penna, Alessio Magliocca, Aurora Merigo, Giulia Stirparo, Giuseppe Silvestri, Ivan Fumagalli, Francesca Ristagno, Giuseppe J Clin Med Review Cardiac arrest, one of the leading causes of death, accounts for numerous clinical studies published each year. This review summarizes the findings of all the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on cardiac arrest published in the year 2022. The RCTs are presented according to the following categories: out-of- and in-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA, IHCA) and post-cardiac arrest care. Interestingly, more than 80% of the RCTs encompassed advanced life support and post-cardiac arrest care, while no studies focused on the treatment of IHCA, except for one that, however, explored the temperature control after resuscitation in this population. Surprisingly, 9 out of 11 RCTs led to neutral results demonstrating equivalency between the newly tested interventions compared to current practice. One trial was negative, showing that oxygen titration in the immediate pre-hospital post-resuscitation period decreased survival compared to a more liberal approach. One RCT was positive and introduced new defibrillation strategies for refractory cardiac arrest. Overall, data from the 2022 RCTs discussed here provide a solid basis to generate new hypotheses to be tested in future clinical studies. MDPI 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10054058/ /pubmed/36983236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062235 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Penna, Alessio
Magliocca, Aurora
Merigo, Giulia
Stirparo, Giuseppe
Silvestri, Ivan
Fumagalli, Francesca
Ristagno, Giuseppe
One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials
title One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short One-Year Review in Cardiac Arrest: The 2022 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort one-year review in cardiac arrest: the 2022 randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10054058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062235
work_keys_str_mv AT pennaalessio oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT maglioccaaurora oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT merigogiulia oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT stirparogiuseppe oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT silvestriivan oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fumagallifrancesca oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ristagnogiuseppe oneyearreviewincardiacarrestthe2022randomizedcontrolledtrials