Cargando…

Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Medical exposure to ionizing radiation has increased due to an increase in the number of computerized tomography (CT) scan examinations performed. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends indication-based diagnostic reference levels (IB-DRLs) as an effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiragga, Festo, Erem, Geoffrey, Kisembo, Harriet, Mayanja, John Mark Kasumba, Mubuuke, Aloysius G., Nankya, Ethel, Nalwoga, Kevina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10055658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36993740
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2683913/v1
_version_ 1785015920848011264
author Kiragga, Festo
Erem, Geoffrey
Kisembo, Harriet
Mayanja, John Mark Kasumba
Mubuuke, Aloysius G.
Nankya, Ethel
Nalwoga, Kevina
author_facet Kiragga, Festo
Erem, Geoffrey
Kisembo, Harriet
Mayanja, John Mark Kasumba
Mubuuke, Aloysius G.
Nankya, Ethel
Nalwoga, Kevina
author_sort Kiragga, Festo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical exposure to ionizing radiation has increased due to an increase in the number of computerized tomography (CT) scan examinations performed. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends indication-based diagnostic reference levels (IB-DRLs) as an effective tool that aids in optimizing CT scan radiation doses. In many low-income settings, there is a lack of IB-DRLs to support optimization of radiation doses. OBJECTIVE: To establish typical DRLs for common CT scan indications among adult patients in Kampala, Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional study design was employed involving 337 participants enrolled from three hospitals using systematic sampling. The participants were adults who had been referred for a CT scan. The typical DRL of each indication was determined as the median value of the pooled distribution of CTDIvol (mGy) data and the median value of the pooled distribution of total DLP (tDLP)(mGy.cm) data from three hospitals. Comparison was made to anatomical, and indication based DRLs from other studies. RESULTS: 54.3% of the participants were male. The following were typical DRLs for: acute stroke (30.17mGy and 653mGy.cm); head trauma (32.04mGy and 878mGy.cm); interstitial lung diseases/ high resolution chest CT scan (4.66mGy and 161mGy.cm); pulmonary embolism (5.03mGy and 273mGy.cm); abdominopelvic lesion (6.93mGy and 838mGy.cm) and urinary calculi (7.61mGy and 975mGy.cm). Indication based total Dose Length Product (tDLP) DRLs was lower than tDLP DRLs of a whole anatomical region by 36.4% on average. Most of the developed typical IB-DLP DRLs were lower or comparable to values from studies in Ghana and Egypt in all indications besides urinary calculi while they were higher than values in a French study in all indications besides acute stroke and head trauma. CONCLUSION: Typical IB-DRLs is a good clinical practice tool for optimization of CT doses and therefore recommended for use to manage CT radiation dose. The developed IB-DRLs varied from international values due to differences in selection of CT scan parameters and standardization of CT imaging protocols may narrow the variation. This study can serve as baseline for establishment of national indication-based CT DRLs in Uganda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10055658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100556582023-03-30 Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study Kiragga, Festo Erem, Geoffrey Kisembo, Harriet Mayanja, John Mark Kasumba Mubuuke, Aloysius G. Nankya, Ethel Nalwoga, Kevina Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Medical exposure to ionizing radiation has increased due to an increase in the number of computerized tomography (CT) scan examinations performed. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends indication-based diagnostic reference levels (IB-DRLs) as an effective tool that aids in optimizing CT scan radiation doses. In many low-income settings, there is a lack of IB-DRLs to support optimization of radiation doses. OBJECTIVE: To establish typical DRLs for common CT scan indications among adult patients in Kampala, Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional study design was employed involving 337 participants enrolled from three hospitals using systematic sampling. The participants were adults who had been referred for a CT scan. The typical DRL of each indication was determined as the median value of the pooled distribution of CTDIvol (mGy) data and the median value of the pooled distribution of total DLP (tDLP)(mGy.cm) data from three hospitals. Comparison was made to anatomical, and indication based DRLs from other studies. RESULTS: 54.3% of the participants were male. The following were typical DRLs for: acute stroke (30.17mGy and 653mGy.cm); head trauma (32.04mGy and 878mGy.cm); interstitial lung diseases/ high resolution chest CT scan (4.66mGy and 161mGy.cm); pulmonary embolism (5.03mGy and 273mGy.cm); abdominopelvic lesion (6.93mGy and 838mGy.cm) and urinary calculi (7.61mGy and 975mGy.cm). Indication based total Dose Length Product (tDLP) DRLs was lower than tDLP DRLs of a whole anatomical region by 36.4% on average. Most of the developed typical IB-DLP DRLs were lower or comparable to values from studies in Ghana and Egypt in all indications besides urinary calculi while they were higher than values in a French study in all indications besides acute stroke and head trauma. CONCLUSION: Typical IB-DRLs is a good clinical practice tool for optimization of CT doses and therefore recommended for use to manage CT radiation dose. The developed IB-DRLs varied from international values due to differences in selection of CT scan parameters and standardization of CT imaging protocols may narrow the variation. This study can serve as baseline for establishment of national indication-based CT DRLs in Uganda. American Journal Experts 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10055658/ /pubmed/36993740 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2683913/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Kiragga, Festo
Erem, Geoffrey
Kisembo, Harriet
Mayanja, John Mark Kasumba
Mubuuke, Aloysius G.
Nankya, Ethel
Nalwoga, Kevina
Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study
title Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study
title_full Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study
title_short Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study
title_sort typical diagnostic reference levels of common indications for computed tomography scans among adult patients in uganda: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10055658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36993740
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2683913/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT kiraggafesto typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT eremgeoffrey typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kisemboharriet typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mayanjajohnmarkkasumba typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mubuukealoysiusg typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT nankyaethel typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT nalwogakevina typicaldiagnosticreferencelevelsofcommonindicationsforcomputedtomographyscansamongadultpatientsinugandaacrosssectionalstudy