Cargando…

Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept

It is generally accepted that microorganisms can colonize a non-pathological endometrium. However, in a clinical setting, endometrial samples are always collected by passing through the vaginal–cervical route. As such, the vaginal and cervical microbiomes can easily cross-contaminate endometrial sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanstokstraeten, Robin, Callewaert, Ellen, Blotwijk, Susanne, Rombauts, Eleni, Crombé, Florence, Emmerechts, Kristof, Soetens, Oriane, Vandoorslaer, Kristof, De Geyter, Deborah, Allonsius, Camille, Vander Donck, Leonore, Blockeel, Christophe, Wybo, Ingrid, Piérard, Denis, Demuyser, Thomas, Mackens, Shari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10055768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065947
_version_ 1785015952936534016
author Vanstokstraeten, Robin
Callewaert, Ellen
Blotwijk, Susanne
Rombauts, Eleni
Crombé, Florence
Emmerechts, Kristof
Soetens, Oriane
Vandoorslaer, Kristof
De Geyter, Deborah
Allonsius, Camille
Vander Donck, Leonore
Blockeel, Christophe
Wybo, Ingrid
Piérard, Denis
Demuyser, Thomas
Mackens, Shari
author_facet Vanstokstraeten, Robin
Callewaert, Ellen
Blotwijk, Susanne
Rombauts, Eleni
Crombé, Florence
Emmerechts, Kristof
Soetens, Oriane
Vandoorslaer, Kristof
De Geyter, Deborah
Allonsius, Camille
Vander Donck, Leonore
Blockeel, Christophe
Wybo, Ingrid
Piérard, Denis
Demuyser, Thomas
Mackens, Shari
author_sort Vanstokstraeten, Robin
collection PubMed
description It is generally accepted that microorganisms can colonize a non-pathological endometrium. However, in a clinical setting, endometrial samples are always collected by passing through the vaginal–cervical route. As such, the vaginal and cervical microbiomes can easily cross-contaminate endometrial samples, resulting in a biased representation of the endometrial microbiome. This makes it difficult to demonstrate that the endometrial microbiome is not merely a reflection of contamination originating from sampling. Therefore, we investigated to what extent the endometrial microbiome corresponds to that of the vagina, applying culturomics on paired vaginal and endometrial samples. Culturomics could give novel insights into the microbiome of the female genital tract, as it overcomes sequencing-related bias. Ten subfertile women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were included. An additional vaginal swab was taken from each participant right before hysteroscopy. Both endometrial biopsies and vaginal swabs were analyzed using our previously described WASPLab-assisted culturomics protocol. In total, 101 bacterial and two fungal species were identified among these 10 patients. Fifty-six species were found in endometrial biopsies and 90 were found in vaginal swabs. On average, 28 % of species were found in both the endometrial biopsy and vaginal swab of a given patient. Of the 56 species found in the endometrial biopsies, 13 were not found in the vaginal swabs. Of the 90 species found in vaginal swabs, 47 were not found in the endometrium. Our culturomics-based approach sheds a different light on the current understanding of the endometrial microbiome. The data suggest the potential existence of a unique endometrial microbiome that is not merely a presentation of cross-contamination derived from sampling. However, we cannot exclude cross-contamination completely. In addition, we observe that the microbiome of the vagina is richer in species than that of the endometrium, which contradicts the current sequence-based literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10055768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100557682023-03-30 Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept Vanstokstraeten, Robin Callewaert, Ellen Blotwijk, Susanne Rombauts, Eleni Crombé, Florence Emmerechts, Kristof Soetens, Oriane Vandoorslaer, Kristof De Geyter, Deborah Allonsius, Camille Vander Donck, Leonore Blockeel, Christophe Wybo, Ingrid Piérard, Denis Demuyser, Thomas Mackens, Shari Int J Mol Sci Article It is generally accepted that microorganisms can colonize a non-pathological endometrium. However, in a clinical setting, endometrial samples are always collected by passing through the vaginal–cervical route. As such, the vaginal and cervical microbiomes can easily cross-contaminate endometrial samples, resulting in a biased representation of the endometrial microbiome. This makes it difficult to demonstrate that the endometrial microbiome is not merely a reflection of contamination originating from sampling. Therefore, we investigated to what extent the endometrial microbiome corresponds to that of the vagina, applying culturomics on paired vaginal and endometrial samples. Culturomics could give novel insights into the microbiome of the female genital tract, as it overcomes sequencing-related bias. Ten subfertile women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were included. An additional vaginal swab was taken from each participant right before hysteroscopy. Both endometrial biopsies and vaginal swabs were analyzed using our previously described WASPLab-assisted culturomics protocol. In total, 101 bacterial and two fungal species were identified among these 10 patients. Fifty-six species were found in endometrial biopsies and 90 were found in vaginal swabs. On average, 28 % of species were found in both the endometrial biopsy and vaginal swab of a given patient. Of the 56 species found in the endometrial biopsies, 13 were not found in the vaginal swabs. Of the 90 species found in vaginal swabs, 47 were not found in the endometrium. Our culturomics-based approach sheds a different light on the current understanding of the endometrial microbiome. The data suggest the potential existence of a unique endometrial microbiome that is not merely a presentation of cross-contamination derived from sampling. However, we cannot exclude cross-contamination completely. In addition, we observe that the microbiome of the vagina is richer in species than that of the endometrium, which contradicts the current sequence-based literature. MDPI 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10055768/ /pubmed/36983020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065947 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vanstokstraeten, Robin
Callewaert, Ellen
Blotwijk, Susanne
Rombauts, Eleni
Crombé, Florence
Emmerechts, Kristof
Soetens, Oriane
Vandoorslaer, Kristof
De Geyter, Deborah
Allonsius, Camille
Vander Donck, Leonore
Blockeel, Christophe
Wybo, Ingrid
Piérard, Denis
Demuyser, Thomas
Mackens, Shari
Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
title Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
title_full Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
title_fullStr Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
title_short Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
title_sort comparing vaginal and endometrial microbiota using culturomics: proof of concept
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10055768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065947
work_keys_str_mv AT vanstokstraetenrobin comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT callewaertellen comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT blotwijksusanne comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT rombautseleni comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT crombeflorence comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT emmerechtskristof comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT soetensoriane comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT vandoorslaerkristof comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT degeyterdeborah comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT allonsiuscamille comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT vanderdonckleonore comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT blockeelchristophe comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT wyboingrid comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT pierarddenis comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT demuyserthomas comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept
AT mackensshari comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept