Cargando…
Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept
It is generally accepted that microorganisms can colonize a non-pathological endometrium. However, in a clinical setting, endometrial samples are always collected by passing through the vaginal–cervical route. As such, the vaginal and cervical microbiomes can easily cross-contaminate endometrial sam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10055768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065947 |
_version_ | 1785015952936534016 |
---|---|
author | Vanstokstraeten, Robin Callewaert, Ellen Blotwijk, Susanne Rombauts, Eleni Crombé, Florence Emmerechts, Kristof Soetens, Oriane Vandoorslaer, Kristof De Geyter, Deborah Allonsius, Camille Vander Donck, Leonore Blockeel, Christophe Wybo, Ingrid Piérard, Denis Demuyser, Thomas Mackens, Shari |
author_facet | Vanstokstraeten, Robin Callewaert, Ellen Blotwijk, Susanne Rombauts, Eleni Crombé, Florence Emmerechts, Kristof Soetens, Oriane Vandoorslaer, Kristof De Geyter, Deborah Allonsius, Camille Vander Donck, Leonore Blockeel, Christophe Wybo, Ingrid Piérard, Denis Demuyser, Thomas Mackens, Shari |
author_sort | Vanstokstraeten, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is generally accepted that microorganisms can colonize a non-pathological endometrium. However, in a clinical setting, endometrial samples are always collected by passing through the vaginal–cervical route. As such, the vaginal and cervical microbiomes can easily cross-contaminate endometrial samples, resulting in a biased representation of the endometrial microbiome. This makes it difficult to demonstrate that the endometrial microbiome is not merely a reflection of contamination originating from sampling. Therefore, we investigated to what extent the endometrial microbiome corresponds to that of the vagina, applying culturomics on paired vaginal and endometrial samples. Culturomics could give novel insights into the microbiome of the female genital tract, as it overcomes sequencing-related bias. Ten subfertile women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were included. An additional vaginal swab was taken from each participant right before hysteroscopy. Both endometrial biopsies and vaginal swabs were analyzed using our previously described WASPLab-assisted culturomics protocol. In total, 101 bacterial and two fungal species were identified among these 10 patients. Fifty-six species were found in endometrial biopsies and 90 were found in vaginal swabs. On average, 28 % of species were found in both the endometrial biopsy and vaginal swab of a given patient. Of the 56 species found in the endometrial biopsies, 13 were not found in the vaginal swabs. Of the 90 species found in vaginal swabs, 47 were not found in the endometrium. Our culturomics-based approach sheds a different light on the current understanding of the endometrial microbiome. The data suggest the potential existence of a unique endometrial microbiome that is not merely a presentation of cross-contamination derived from sampling. However, we cannot exclude cross-contamination completely. In addition, we observe that the microbiome of the vagina is richer in species than that of the endometrium, which contradicts the current sequence-based literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10055768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100557682023-03-30 Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept Vanstokstraeten, Robin Callewaert, Ellen Blotwijk, Susanne Rombauts, Eleni Crombé, Florence Emmerechts, Kristof Soetens, Oriane Vandoorslaer, Kristof De Geyter, Deborah Allonsius, Camille Vander Donck, Leonore Blockeel, Christophe Wybo, Ingrid Piérard, Denis Demuyser, Thomas Mackens, Shari Int J Mol Sci Article It is generally accepted that microorganisms can colonize a non-pathological endometrium. However, in a clinical setting, endometrial samples are always collected by passing through the vaginal–cervical route. As such, the vaginal and cervical microbiomes can easily cross-contaminate endometrial samples, resulting in a biased representation of the endometrial microbiome. This makes it difficult to demonstrate that the endometrial microbiome is not merely a reflection of contamination originating from sampling. Therefore, we investigated to what extent the endometrial microbiome corresponds to that of the vagina, applying culturomics on paired vaginal and endometrial samples. Culturomics could give novel insights into the microbiome of the female genital tract, as it overcomes sequencing-related bias. Ten subfertile women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy were included. An additional vaginal swab was taken from each participant right before hysteroscopy. Both endometrial biopsies and vaginal swabs were analyzed using our previously described WASPLab-assisted culturomics protocol. In total, 101 bacterial and two fungal species were identified among these 10 patients. Fifty-six species were found in endometrial biopsies and 90 were found in vaginal swabs. On average, 28 % of species were found in both the endometrial biopsy and vaginal swab of a given patient. Of the 56 species found in the endometrial biopsies, 13 were not found in the vaginal swabs. Of the 90 species found in vaginal swabs, 47 were not found in the endometrium. Our culturomics-based approach sheds a different light on the current understanding of the endometrial microbiome. The data suggest the potential existence of a unique endometrial microbiome that is not merely a presentation of cross-contamination derived from sampling. However, we cannot exclude cross-contamination completely. In addition, we observe that the microbiome of the vagina is richer in species than that of the endometrium, which contradicts the current sequence-based literature. MDPI 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10055768/ /pubmed/36983020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065947 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vanstokstraeten, Robin Callewaert, Ellen Blotwijk, Susanne Rombauts, Eleni Crombé, Florence Emmerechts, Kristof Soetens, Oriane Vandoorslaer, Kristof De Geyter, Deborah Allonsius, Camille Vander Donck, Leonore Blockeel, Christophe Wybo, Ingrid Piérard, Denis Demuyser, Thomas Mackens, Shari Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept |
title | Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept |
title_full | Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept |
title_fullStr | Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept |
title_short | Comparing Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota Using Culturomics: Proof of Concept |
title_sort | comparing vaginal and endometrial microbiota using culturomics: proof of concept |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10055768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanstokstraetenrobin comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT callewaertellen comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT blotwijksusanne comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT rombautseleni comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT crombeflorence comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT emmerechtskristof comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT soetensoriane comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT vandoorslaerkristof comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT degeyterdeborah comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT allonsiuscamille comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT vanderdonckleonore comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT blockeelchristophe comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT wyboingrid comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT pierarddenis comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT demuyserthomas comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept AT mackensshari comparingvaginalandendometrialmicrobiotausingculturomicsproofofconcept |