Cargando…

Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard

Measurement performance evaluation of real and virtual automotive light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors is an active area of research. However, no commonly accepted automotive standards, metrics, or criteria exist to evaluate their measurement performance. ASTM International released the ASTM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haider, Arsalan, Cho, Yongjae, Pigniczki, Marcell, Köhler, Michael H., Haas, Lukas, Kastner, Ludwig, Fink, Maximilian, Schardt, Michael, Cichy, Yannik, Koyama, Shotaro, Zeh, Thomas, Poguntke, Tim, Inoue, Hideo, Jakobi, Martin, Koch, Alexander W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063113
_version_ 1785016035888332800
author Haider, Arsalan
Cho, Yongjae
Pigniczki, Marcell
Köhler, Michael H.
Haas, Lukas
Kastner, Ludwig
Fink, Maximilian
Schardt, Michael
Cichy, Yannik
Koyama, Shotaro
Zeh, Thomas
Poguntke, Tim
Inoue, Hideo
Jakobi, Martin
Koch, Alexander W.
author_facet Haider, Arsalan
Cho, Yongjae
Pigniczki, Marcell
Köhler, Michael H.
Haas, Lukas
Kastner, Ludwig
Fink, Maximilian
Schardt, Michael
Cichy, Yannik
Koyama, Shotaro
Zeh, Thomas
Poguntke, Tim
Inoue, Hideo
Jakobi, Martin
Koch, Alexander W.
author_sort Haider, Arsalan
collection PubMed
description Measurement performance evaluation of real and virtual automotive light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors is an active area of research. However, no commonly accepted automotive standards, metrics, or criteria exist to evaluate their measurement performance. ASTM International released the ASTM E3125-17 standard for the operational performance evaluation of 3D imaging systems commonly referred to as terrestrial laser scanners (TLS). This standard defines the specifications and static test procedures to evaluate the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of TLS. In this work, we have assessed the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of a commercial micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)-based automotive LiDAR sensor and its simulation model according to the test procedures defined in this standard. The static tests were performed in a laboratory environment. In addition, a subset of static tests was also performed at the proving ground in natural environmental conditions to determine the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of the real LiDAR sensor. In addition, real scenarios and environmental conditions were replicated in the virtual environment of a commercial software to verify the LiDAR model’s working performance. The evaluation results show that the LiDAR sensor and its simulation model under analysis pass all the tests specified in the ASTM E3125-17 standard. This standard helps to understand whether sensor measurement errors are due to internal or external influences. We have also shown that the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of LiDAR sensors significantly impacts the working performance of the object recognition algorithm. That is why this standard can be beneficial in validating automotive real and virtual LiDAR sensors, at least in the early stage of development. Furthermore, the simulation and real measurements show good agreement on the point cloud and object recognition levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10056070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100560702023-03-30 Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard Haider, Arsalan Cho, Yongjae Pigniczki, Marcell Köhler, Michael H. Haas, Lukas Kastner, Ludwig Fink, Maximilian Schardt, Michael Cichy, Yannik Koyama, Shotaro Zeh, Thomas Poguntke, Tim Inoue, Hideo Jakobi, Martin Koch, Alexander W. Sensors (Basel) Article Measurement performance evaluation of real and virtual automotive light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors is an active area of research. However, no commonly accepted automotive standards, metrics, or criteria exist to evaluate their measurement performance. ASTM International released the ASTM E3125-17 standard for the operational performance evaluation of 3D imaging systems commonly referred to as terrestrial laser scanners (TLS). This standard defines the specifications and static test procedures to evaluate the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of TLS. In this work, we have assessed the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of a commercial micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)-based automotive LiDAR sensor and its simulation model according to the test procedures defined in this standard. The static tests were performed in a laboratory environment. In addition, a subset of static tests was also performed at the proving ground in natural environmental conditions to determine the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of the real LiDAR sensor. In addition, real scenarios and environmental conditions were replicated in the virtual environment of a commercial software to verify the LiDAR model’s working performance. The evaluation results show that the LiDAR sensor and its simulation model under analysis pass all the tests specified in the ASTM E3125-17 standard. This standard helps to understand whether sensor measurement errors are due to internal or external influences. We have also shown that the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of LiDAR sensors significantly impacts the working performance of the object recognition algorithm. That is why this standard can be beneficial in validating automotive real and virtual LiDAR sensors, at least in the early stage of development. Furthermore, the simulation and real measurements show good agreement on the point cloud and object recognition levels. MDPI 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10056070/ /pubmed/36991824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063113 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haider, Arsalan
Cho, Yongjae
Pigniczki, Marcell
Köhler, Michael H.
Haas, Lukas
Kastner, Ludwig
Fink, Maximilian
Schardt, Michael
Cichy, Yannik
Koyama, Shotaro
Zeh, Thomas
Poguntke, Tim
Inoue, Hideo
Jakobi, Martin
Koch, Alexander W.
Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
title Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
title_full Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
title_short Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
title_sort performance evaluation of mems-based automotive lidar sensor and its simulation model as per astm e3125-17 standard
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23063113
work_keys_str_mv AT haiderarsalan performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT choyongjae performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT pigniczkimarcell performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT kohlermichaelh performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT haaslukas performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT kastnerludwig performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT finkmaximilian performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT schardtmichael performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT cichyyannik performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT koyamashotaro performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT zehthomas performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT poguntketim performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT inouehideo performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT jakobimartin performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard
AT kochalexanderw performanceevaluationofmemsbasedautomotivelidarsensoranditssimulationmodelasperastme312517standard