Cargando…
Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study
Background and Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a grasping-type knife, called Clutch Cutter (CC), for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). Methods: This was a randomized prospective study. Patients who underwent C-ESD for colorectal neoplasms >20 mm and <50 mm in siz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062329 |
_version_ | 1785016047035744256 |
---|---|
author | Yachida, Tatsuo Kobara, Hideki Kozuka, Kazuhiro Nakatani, Kaho Tada, Naoya Matsui, Takanori Chiyo, Taiga Kobayashi, Nobuya Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Kondo, Akihiro Ando, Yasuhisa Okano, Keiichi Nonaka, Wakako Ishikawa, Kaori Masugata, Hisashi Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_facet | Yachida, Tatsuo Kobara, Hideki Kozuka, Kazuhiro Nakatani, Kaho Tada, Naoya Matsui, Takanori Chiyo, Taiga Kobayashi, Nobuya Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Kondo, Akihiro Ando, Yasuhisa Okano, Keiichi Nonaka, Wakako Ishikawa, Kaori Masugata, Hisashi Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_sort | Yachida, Tatsuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a grasping-type knife, called Clutch Cutter (CC), for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). Methods: This was a randomized prospective study. Patients who underwent C-ESD for colorectal neoplasms >20 mm and <50 mm in size were enrolled, dividing into two groups: ESD using needle type of dual knife alone (D-group) and circumferential incision using dual knife followed by submucosal dissection using CC (CC-group). The primary outcome was the self-completion rate. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative complication rate, procedure time, and en bloc resection rate. Results: A total of 45 patients were allocated to the D-group and 43 to the CC-group were allocated. The self-completion rate was higher in the CC-group (87% [39/45] vs. 98% [42/43]). All of the six patients with an incomplete procedure in the D-group were completely resected with CC use. The intraoperative complication rate was not significant in either group (D vs. CC: 2% vs. 0%). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the D-group than that in the CC-group (62.0 vs. 81.1 min; p = 0.0036). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in the D-group and 98% in the CC-group. Conclusions: While dual knife use is superior to CC in terms of time efficiency, the use of CC may be a safe and efficacious option for achieving complete C-ESD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10056117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100561172023-03-30 Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study Yachida, Tatsuo Kobara, Hideki Kozuka, Kazuhiro Nakatani, Kaho Tada, Naoya Matsui, Takanori Chiyo, Taiga Kobayashi, Nobuya Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Kondo, Akihiro Ando, Yasuhisa Okano, Keiichi Nonaka, Wakako Ishikawa, Kaori Masugata, Hisashi Masaki, Tsutomu J Clin Med Article Background and Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a grasping-type knife, called Clutch Cutter (CC), for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). Methods: This was a randomized prospective study. Patients who underwent C-ESD for colorectal neoplasms >20 mm and <50 mm in size were enrolled, dividing into two groups: ESD using needle type of dual knife alone (D-group) and circumferential incision using dual knife followed by submucosal dissection using CC (CC-group). The primary outcome was the self-completion rate. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative complication rate, procedure time, and en bloc resection rate. Results: A total of 45 patients were allocated to the D-group and 43 to the CC-group were allocated. The self-completion rate was higher in the CC-group (87% [39/45] vs. 98% [42/43]). All of the six patients with an incomplete procedure in the D-group were completely resected with CC use. The intraoperative complication rate was not significant in either group (D vs. CC: 2% vs. 0%). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the D-group than that in the CC-group (62.0 vs. 81.1 min; p = 0.0036). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in the D-group and 98% in the CC-group. Conclusions: While dual knife use is superior to CC in terms of time efficiency, the use of CC may be a safe and efficacious option for achieving complete C-ESD. MDPI 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10056117/ /pubmed/36983328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062329 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yachida, Tatsuo Kobara, Hideki Kozuka, Kazuhiro Nakatani, Kaho Tada, Naoya Matsui, Takanori Chiyo, Taiga Kobayashi, Nobuya Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Kondo, Akihiro Ando, Yasuhisa Okano, Keiichi Nonaka, Wakako Ishikawa, Kaori Masugata, Hisashi Masaki, Tsutomu Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title | Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full | Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_short | Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study |
title_sort | comparison of needle knife versus scissors forceps for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective randomized study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10056117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062329 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yachidatatsuo comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT kobarahideki comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT kozukakazuhiro comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT nakatanikaho comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT tadanaoya comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT matsuitakanori comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT chiyotaiga comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT kobayashinobuya comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT fujiharashintaro comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT nishiyamanoriko comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT kondoakihiro comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT andoyasuhisa comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT okanokeiichi comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT nonakawakako comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT ishikawakaori comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT masugatahisashi comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT masakitsutomu comparisonofneedleknifeversusscissorsforcepsforcolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaprospectiverandomizedstudy |